Corrigendum: Using combined evidence from replicates to evaluate ChIP-seq peaks (Bioinformatics (2015) DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv293);Using combined evidence from replicates to evaluate ChIP-seq peaks

Bioinformatics

Volumn 31, Issue 17, 2015, Pages 2761-2769

  Jalili, Vahid ^a   Matteucci, Matteo ^a   Masseroli, Marco ^a   Morelli, Marco J ^b  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^b ISTITUTO ITALIANO DI TECNOLOGIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMATIN; MYC PROTEIN; MYC PROTEIN, HUMAN; PROTEIN BINDING; STUB1 PROTEIN, HUMAN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE;

ALGORITHM; BIOLOGY; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; DNA SEQUENCE; EVALUATION STUDY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME; K562 CELL LINE; METABOLISM; NUCLEOTIDE MOTIF; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOFTWARE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENOME, HUMAN; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; K562 CELLS; NUCLEOTIDE MOTIFS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTO-ONCOGENE PROTEINS C-MYC; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SOFTWARE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN LIGASES;

EID: 84940785927     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty119     Document Type: Erratum

References (14)

1. Bailey T.L. (2011). DREME: motif discovery in transcription factor ChIP-seq data. Bioinformatics, 27, 1653-1659
2. Bailey T., et al. (2013). Practical guidelines for the comprehensive analysis of ChIP-seq data. PLoS Comput. Biol., 9, e1003326
3. Benjamini Y., and Hochberg Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical, and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B, 289-300
4. Chen Y., et al. (2012). Systematic evaluation of factors influencing ChIP-seq fidelity. Nat. Methods, 9, 609-614
5. Gupta S., et al. (2007). Quantifying similarity between motifs. Genome Biol., 8, R24
6. Ibrahim M.M., et al. (2015). JAMM: a peak finder for joint analysis of NGS replicates. Bioinformatics, 31, 48-55
7. Landt S.G., et al. (2012). ChIP-seq guidelines, and practices of the ENCODE, and modENCODE consortia. Genome Res., 22, 1813-1831
8. Li Q., et al. (2011). Measuring reproducibility of high-throughput experiments. Ann. Appl. Stat., 5, 1752-1779
9. Mathelier A., et al. (2014). JASPAR 2014: an extensively expanded, and updated open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D142-D147
10. Murre C., et al. (1989). A new DNA binding, and dimerization motif in immunoglobulin enhancer binding, daughterless, MyoD, and myc proteins. Cell, 56, 777-783
11. Rashid N.U., et al. (2011). ZINBA integrates local covariates with DNA-seq data to identify broad, and narrow regions of enrichment, even within amplified genomic regions. Genome Biol., 12, R67
12. Walhout A.J., et al. (1997). c-Myc/Max heterodimers bind cooperatively to the E-box sequences located in the first intron of the rat ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) gene. Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 1493-1501
13. Zeng X., et al. (2013). jMOSAiCS: joint analysis of multiple ChIP-seq datasets. Genome Biol., 14, R38
14. Zhang Y., et al. (2008). Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol., 9, R137