A balanced microbiota efficiently produces methane in a novel high-rate horizontal anaerobic reactor for the treatment of swine wastewater

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 197, Issue , 2015, Pages 152-160

  Duda, Rose Maria ^a,c   da Silva Vantini, Juliana ^a   Martins, Larissa Scattolin ^a   de Mello Varani, Alessandro ^a   Lemos, Manoel Victor Franco ^b   Ferro, Maria Inês Tiraboschi ^a   de Oliveira, Roberto Alves ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b Faculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences   (Brazil)

^c Faculty of Technology Jaboticabal   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Biogas; Methanogenic archaea; Next generation sequencing; Quantitative real time PCR; Renewable energy

Indexed keywords

ALKALINITY; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; BACTERIA; BIOGAS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; METHANE; MICROORGANISMS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

METHANE PRODUCING ARCHAEA; METHANOGENIC ARCHAEA; METHANOMICROBIALES (MMB); MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING; QUANTITATIVE REAL TIME PCR; RENEWABLE ENERGIES; SPECIFIC METHANE PRODUCTION;

WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

ACID; METHANE; VOLATILE AGENT; SEWAGE; WASTE WATER; WATER POLLUTANT;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIOGAS; BIOREACTOR; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; METHANE; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; WASTEWATER; WATER TREATMENT;

ACTINOBACTERIA; ALKALINITY; ANAEROBIC REACTOR; ARTICLE; BACTEROIDETES; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; ENERGY YIELD; EURYARCHAEOTA; FIRMICUTES; METHANOBACTERIALES; METHANOGENESIS; METHANOGENIC ARCHAEON; METHANOGENIC BACTERIUM; METHANOMICROBIALES; METHANOSAETACEAE; METHANOSARCINACEAE; METHANOSARCINALES; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; NONHUMAN; PH; PHYLUM; PIG FARMING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEOBACTERIA; REACTOR OPERATION; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RENEWABLE ENERGY; SLUDGE; SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER; WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT; ANAEROBIC GROWTH; ANIMAL; ARCHAEON; BACTERIUM; BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; BIOREACTOR; BIOSYNTHESIS; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; PIG; PROCEDURES; SEWAGE; WASTE WATER; WATER POLLUTANT;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BACTEROIDETES; FIRMICUTES; METHANOBACTERIALES; METHANOMICROBIALES; METHANOSARCINALES; PROTEOBACTERIA; SUIDAE;

ANAEROBIOSIS; ANIMALS; ARCHAEA; BACTERIA; BIOLOGICAL OXYGEN DEMAND ANALYSIS; BIOREACTORS; METHANE; METHANOMICROBIALES; PHYLOGENY; REAL-TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SEWAGE; SWINE; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID; WASTE WATER; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 84940776654     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.004     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Akuzawa M., Hori T., Haruta S., Ueno Y., Ishii M., Igarashi Y. Distinctive responses of metabolically active microbiota to acidification in a thermophilic anaerobic digester. Microb. Ecol. 2011, 61:595-605.
2. Altschul S.F., Madden T.L., Schäffer A.A., Zhang J., Zhang Z., Miller W., Lipman D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25:3389-3402.
3. APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 2005, American Public Health Association, Washington DC, USA. 21th ed.
4. Brown P.O., Botstein D. Exploring the new world of the genome with DNA microarrays. Nat. Genet. 1999, 21:33-37.
5. Colin X., Farinet J.L., Rojas O., Alazard D. Anaerobic treatment of cassava starch extraction wastewater using a horizontal flow filter with bamboo as support. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98:1602-1607.
6. Deng L., Li Y., Chen Z., Liu G., Yang H. Separation of swine slurry into different concentration fractions and its influence on biogas fermentation. Appl. Energy 2014, 114:504-511.
7. Dohrmann A.B., Baumert S., Klingebiel L., Weiland P., Tebbe C.C. Bacterial community structure in experimental methanogenic bioreactors and search for pathogenic clostridia as community members. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 89:1991-2004.
8. Duda R.M., de Oliveira R.A. Tratamento de águas residuárias de suinocultura em reator UASB e filtro anaeróbio em série seguidos de filtro biológico percolador. Eng. Sanit. Ambient. 2011, 16:91-100.
9. Franke-Whittle I.H., Walter A., Ebner C., Insam H. Investigation into the effect of high concentrations of volatile fatty acids in anaerobic digestion on methanogenic communities. Waste Manag. 2014, 34:2080-2089.
10. Gao B., Gupta R.S. Conserved indels in protein sequences that are characteristics of the phylum Actinobacteria. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2005, 55:2401-2412.
11. IBGE - SIDRA [WWW Document], n.d. (accessed 7.15.15). http://www.sidra.ibge.gov.br/bda/pecua/default.asp?t=2%26z=t%26o=24%26u1=1%26u3=1%26u4=1%26u5=1%26u6=1%26u7=1%26u2=1.
12. Jang H.M., Kim J.H., Ha J.H., Park J.M. Bacterial and methanogenic archaeal communities during the single-stage anaerobic digestion of high-strength food wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 165:174-182.
13. Ju F., Zhang T. Novel microbial populations in ambient and mesophilic biogas-producing and phenol-degrading consortia unraveled by high-throughput sequencing. Microb. Ecol. 2014, 68:235-246.
14. Kim W., Shin S.G., Cho K., Lee C., Hwang S. Performance of methanogenic reactors in temperature phased two-stage anaerobic digestion of swine wastewater. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2012, 114:635-639.
15. Kim W., Cho K., Lee S., Hwang S. Comparison of methanogenic community structure and anaerobic process performance treating swine wastewater between pilot and optimized lab scale bioreactors. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 145:48-56.
16. Kopecky J., Kyselkova M., Omelka M., Cermak L., Novotna J., Grundmann G.L., Moënne-Loccoz Y., Sagova-Mareckova M. Actinobacterial community dominated by a distinct clade in acidic soil of a waterlogged deciduous forest. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2011, 78:386-394.
17. Kythreotou N., Tassou S.a., Florides G. An assessment of the biomass potential of Cyprus for energy production. Energy 2012, 47:253-261.
18. Lee D.H., Zo Y.G., Kim S.J. Nonradioactive method to study genetic profiles of natural bacterial communities by PCR-single-strand-conformation polymorphism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1996, 62:3112-3120.
19. Lima A.L., de Oliveira R.F.M., Donzele J.L., Fernandes H.C., Campos P.H.R.F., Antunes M.V.D.L. Resfriamento do piso da maternidade para porcas em lactação no verão. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2011, 40:804-811.
20. Liu A., Chou C., Chen L., Kuo C. Bacterial community dynamics in a swine wastewater anaerobic reactor revealed by 16S rDNA sequence analysis. J. Biotechnol. 2015, 194:124-131.
21. Lunedo R., Fernandez-Alarcon M.F., Carvalho F.M.S., Furlan L.R., Macari M. Analysis of the intestinal bacterial microbiota in maize- or sorghum-fed broiler chickens using real-time PCR. Br. Poult. Sci. 2014, 55:795-803.
22. McGlone J.J. The future of pork production in the world: towards sustainable, welfare-positive systems. Animals 2013, 3:401-415.
23. Merlino G., Rizzi A., Schievano A., Tenca A., Scaglia B., Oberti R., Adani F., Daffonchio D. Microbial community structure and dynamics in two-stage vs single-stage thermophilic anaerobic digestion of mixed swine slurry and market bio-waste. Water Res. 2013, 47:1983-1995.
24. Pervin H.M., Batstone D.J., Bond P.L. Previously unclassified bacteria dominate during thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic pre-treatment of primary sludge. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2013, 36:281-290.
25. Ripley L.E., Boyle W.C., Converse J.C. Improved alkalimetric monitoring for anaerobic digestion of high-strength wastes. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 1986, 58:406-411.
26. Shin S.G., Yoo S., Hwang K., Song M., Kim W., Han G., Hwang S. Dynamics of transitional acidogenic community along with methanogenic population during anaerobic digestion of swine wastewater. Process Biochem. 2011, 46:1607-1613.
27. Song M., Shin S.G., Hwang S. Methanogenic population dynamics assessed by real-time quantitative PCR in sludge granule in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket treating swine wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:S23-S28.
28. Theofanous E., Kythreotou N., Panayiotou G., Florides G. Energy production from piggery waste using anaerobic digestion: current status and potential in Cyprus. Renew. Energy 2014, 71:263-270.
29. Ward A.J., Hobbs P.J., Holliman P.J., Jones D.L. Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:7928-7940.
30. Wirth R., Kovács E., Maróti G., Bagi Z., Rákhely G., Kovács K.L. Characterization of a biogas-producing microbial community by short-read next generation DNA sequencing. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2012, 5:41.
31. Yang D., Deng L., Zheng D., Liu G., Yang H., Wang L. Separation of swine wastewater into solid fraction, concentrated slurry and dilute liquid and its influence on biogas production. Fuel 2015, 144:237-243.
32. Yu Y., Kim J., Hwang S. Use of real-time PCR for group-specific quantification of aceticlastic methanogens in anaerobic processes: population dynamics and community structures. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2006, 93:424-433.
33. Zaiat M., Cabral a.K.a., Foresti E. Cell wash-out and external mass transfer resistance in horizontal-flow anaerobic immobilized sludge reactor. Water Res. 1996, 30:2435-2439.
34. Zamorano P.L., Mahesh V.B., Brann D.W. Quantitative RT-PCR for neuroendocrine studies. A minireview. Neuroendocrinology 1996, 63:397-407.