Comparison of methanogenic community structure and anaerobic process performance treating swine wastewater between pilot and optimized lab scale bioreactors

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 145, Issue , 2013, Pages 48-56

  Kim, Woong ^a   Cho, Kyungjin ^b   Lee, Seungyong ^c   Hwang, Seokhwan ^b  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

^b Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH)   (South Korea)

^c POSCO   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Lab scale; Optimized; Pilot scale; Swine wastewater

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; CARBOHYDRATES; LABORATORIES; METHANE; OPTIMIZATION; PILOT PLANTS; PROTEINS; REMOVAL; SOCIAL SCIENCES;

LAB SCALE; LAB-SCALE BIOREACTORS; METHANOGENIC COMMUNITY STRUCTURES; OPTIMIZED; PILOT SCALE; PROCESS PERFORMANCE; REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES; SWINE WASTEWATER;

WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

CARBOHYDRATE; LIPID; METHANE; PROTEIN;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIOREACTOR; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; MANURE; METHANOGENESIS; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PIG; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; VOLATILE SUBSTANCE; WASTE TREATMENT; WASTEWATER;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ARTICLE; BIOREACTOR; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTINUOUS STIRRED TANK REACTOR; METHANOCULLEUS; METHANOCULLEUS BOURGENSIS; METHANOCULLEUS RECEPTACULII; METHANOGEN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; STEADY STATE; SWINE; TURNOVER TIME; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT;

METHANOCULLEUS; METHANOCULLEUS BOURGENSIS; SUIDAE;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; COD; CONTINUOUSLY STIRRED TANK REACTOR; CSTR; DDW; DEIONIZED AND DISTILLED WATER; DENATURATING GRADIENT GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; DGGE; HRT; HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME; LAB SCALE; METHANE YIELD; MY; NATIONAL CENTER FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY INFORMATION; NATIONAL LIVESTOCK RESEARCH INSTITUTE; NCBI; NLRI; OLR; OPTIMIZED; ORGANIC LOADING RATE; PILOT SCALE; SWINE WASTEWATER; TC; TOTAL CARBOHYDRATES; TOTAL SOLIDS; TOTAL VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS; TS; TVFAS; VFAS; VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS; VOLATILE SOLIDS; VOLATILE SUSPENDED SOLIDS; VS; VSS;

ANAEROBIOSIS; ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; BIOLOGICAL OXYGEN DEMAND ANALYSIS; BIOREACTORS; CLONING, MOLECULAR; DENATURING GRADIENT GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; DNA PRIMERS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FATTY ACIDS, VOLATILE; MANURE; METHANE; METHANOMICROBIACEAE; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SWINE; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID;

EID: 84883456187     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.044     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ahn J.H., Do T.H., Kim S.D., Hwang S. The effect of calcium on the anaerobic digestion treating swine wastewater. Biochem. Eng. J. 2006, 30(1):33-38.
2. Alvarez R., Lidén G. The effect of temperature variation on biomethanation at high altitude. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99(15):7278-7284.
3. Angenent L.T., Sung S., Raskin L. Methanogenic population dynamics during startup of a full-scale anaerobic sequencing batch reactor treating swine waste. Water Res. 2002, 36(18):4648-4654.
4. APHA-AWWA-WEF Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 2005, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC. 21st ed.
5. Asakawa S., Nagaoka K. Methanoculleus bourgensis, Methanoculleus olentangyi and Methanoculleus oldenburgensis are subjective synonyms. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2003, 53(5):1551-1552.
6. Berg B., McClaugherty C. Plant Litter: Decomposition, Humus Formation, Carbon Sequestration 2007, Springer. 2nd ed.
7. Bligh E.G., Dyer W.J. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 1959, 37(8):911-917.
8. Cadillo-Quiroz H., Yavitt J.B., Zinder S.H. Methanosphaerula palustris gen. nov., sp. nov., a hydrogenotrophic methanogen isolated from a minerotrophic fen peatland. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2009, 59(5):928-935.
9. Calli B., Mertoglu B., Inanc B., Yenigun O. Methanogenic diversity in anaerobic bioreactors under extremely high ammonia levels. Enzyme Microbial Technol. 2005, 37(4):448-455.
10. Curtis T.P., Craine N.G. The comparison of the diversity of activated sludge plants. Water Sci. Technol. 1993, 137:71-78.
11. Elberson M.A., Sowers K.R. Isolation of an Aceticlastic strain of Methanosarcina siciliae from Marine Canyon sediments and emendation of the species description for Methanosarcina siciliae. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1997, 47(4):1258-1261.
12. Fricke W.F., Seedorf H., Henne A., Kruer M., Liesegang H., Hedderich R., Gottschalk G., Thauer R.K. The genome sequence of Methanosphaera stadtmanae reveals why this human intestinal archaeon is restricted to methanol and H2 for methane formation and ATP synthesis. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188(2):642-658.
13. Grady C.P.L., Daigger G.T., Lim G.C. Biological Wastewater Treatment 1999, Marcel Dekker, New York.
14. Griffin M.E., McMahon K.D., Mackie R.I., Raskin L. Methanogenic population dynamics during start-up of anaerobic digesters treating municipal solid waste and biosolids. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1998, 57(3):342-355.
15. Kim J., Lee S., Lee C. Comparative study of changes in reaction profile and microbial community structure in two anaerobic repeated-batch reactors started up with different seed sludges. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 129:495-505.
16. Kim W., Hwang K., Shin S.G., Lee S., Hwang S. Effect of high temperature on bacterial community dynamics in anaerobic acidogenesis using mesophilic sludge inoculum. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101(Suppl. 1):S17-S22.
17. Kim W., Shin S.G., Cho K., Lee C., Hwang S. Performance of methanogenic reactors in temperature phased two-stage anaerobic digestion of swine wastewater. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2012, 114(6):635-639.
18. Kundu K., Sharma S., Sreekrishnan T.R. Changes in microbial communities in a hybrid anaerobic reactor with organic loading rate and temperature. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 129:538-547.
19. Leclerc M., Delbes C., Moletta R., Godon J. Single strand conformation polymorphism monitoring of 16S rDNA Archaea during start-up of an anaerobic digester. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2001, 34(3):213-220.
20. Masse D.I., Croteau F., Masse L., Danesh S. The effect of scale -up on the digestion of swine manure slurry in psychrophilic anaerobic sequencing batch reactors. Trans. ASAE 2004, 47(4):1367-1373.
21. McInerney M.J. Anaerobic Hydrolysis and Fermentation of Fats and Proteins 1988, Wiley, New York.
22. McMahon K.D., Stroot P.G., Mackie R.I., Raskin L. Anaerobic codigestion of municipal solid waste and biosolids under various mixing conditions-II: microbial population dynamics. Water Res. 2001, 35(7):1817-1827.
23. Miller T.L., Lin C. Description of Methanobrevibacter gottschalkii sp. nov., Methanobrevibacter thaueri sp. nov., Methanobrevibacter woesei sp. nov. and Methanobrevibacter wolinii sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2002, 52(3):819-822.
24. Reynolds T.D., Richards P.A. Unit Operations and Processes in Environmental Engineering 1996, PWS Publishing Company, Boston. 2nd ed.
25. Rocheleau S., Greer C.W., Lawrence J.R., Cantin C., Laramee L., Guiot S.R. Differentiation of Methanosaeta concilii and Methanosarcina barkeri in anaerobic mesophilic granular sludge by fluorescent in situ hybridization and confocal scanning laser microscopy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65(5):2222-2229.
26. Ruggeri B., Tommasi T., Sassi G. Energy balance of dark anaerobic fermentation as a tool for sustainability analysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35(19):10202-10211.
27. Sakar S., Yetilmezsoy K., Kocak E. Anaerobic digestion technology in poultry and livestock waste treatment - a literature review. Waste Manage. Res. 2009, 27:3-18.
28. Schwarz A., Mösche M., Wittenberg A., Jördening H.-J., Buchholz K., Reuss M. Mathematical modelling and simulation of an industrial scale fluidized bed reactor for anaerobic wastewater treatment - scale-up effect on pH-gradients. Water Sci. Technol. 1997, 36(6-7):219-227.
29. Shin S.G., Lee S., Lee C., Hwang K., Hwang S. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of microbial community in batch anaerobic digestion of secondary sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101(24):9461-9470.
30. Stams A.J.M., Plugge C.M. Electron transfer in syntrophic communities of anaerobic bacteria and archaea. Nat. Rev. Micro. 2009, 7(8):568-577.
31. Strapoc D., Picardal F.W., Turich C., Schaperdoth I., Macalady J.L., Lipp J.S., Lin Y.-S., Ertefai T.F., Schubotz F., Hinrichs K.-U., Mastalerz M., Schimmelmann A. Methane-producing microbial community in a coal bed of the Illinois Basin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74(8):2424-2432.
32. Wang Y., Zhang Y., Wang J., Meng L. Effects of volatile fatty acid concentrations on methane yield and methanogenic bacteria. Biomass Bioenergy 2009, 33(5):848-853.
33. Yu H.Q., Fang H.H. Thermophilic acidification of dairy wastewater. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2000, 54(3):439-444.
34. Yu Y., Lee C., Kim J., Hwang S. Group-specific primer and probe sets to detect methanogenic communities using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2005, 89(6):670-679.
35. Zielińska M., Cydzik-Kwiatkowska A., Zieliński M., DWbowski M. Impact of temperature, microwave radiation and organic loading rate on methanogenic community and biogas production during fermentation of dairy wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 129:308-314.