Patients' Preferences for Surgical Management of Esophageal Cancer: A Discrete Choice Experiment

World Journal of Surgery

Volumn 39, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 2492-2499

  De Bekker Grob, Esther W ^a   Niers, Eva J ^a   Van Lanschot, J Jan B ^a   Steyerberg, Ewout W ^a   Wijnhoven, Bas P L ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; DECISION MAKING; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; ESOPHAGUS RESECTION; FEMALE; HIGH VOLUME HOSPITAL; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMAN; LIFE EXPECTANCY; LOW VOLUME HOSPITAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PROGNOSIS; PSYCHOLOGY; RISK FACTOR; SURVIVAL RATE;

ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; ESOPHAGECTOMY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HOSPITALS, HIGH-VOLUME; HOSPITALS, LOW-VOLUME; HUMANS; LIFE EXPECTANCY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PROGNOSIS; RISK FACTORS; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 84940707212     PISSN: 03642313     EISSN: 14322323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-3148-8     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Dikken JL, Lemmens VE, Wouters MW et al (2012) Increased incidence and survival for oesophageal cancer but not for gastric cardia cancer in the Netherlands. Eur J Cancer 48:1624-1632
2. Sjoquist KM, Burmeister BH, Smithers BM et al (2011) Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 12:681-692
3. Poghosyan T, Gaujoux S, Chirica M et al (2011) Functional disorders and quality of life after esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction for cancer. J Visc Surg 148:e327-e335
4. Lerut TE, van Lanschot JJ (2004) Chronic symptoms after subtotal or partial oesophagectomy: diagnosis and treatment. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 18:901-915
5. Innes S, Payne S (2009) Advanced cancer patients' prognostic information preferences: a review. Palliat Med 23:29-39
6. de Bekker-Grob EW, Ryan M, Gerard K (2012) Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Health Econ 21:145-172
7. Ryan M (2004) Discrete choice experiments in health care. Br Med J 328:360-361
8. Hensher DA, Rose JM, Greene WH (2005) Applied choice analysis: a primer. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
9. Wouters MW, Krijnen P, Le Cessie S et al (2009) Volume- or outcome-based referral to improve quality of care for esophageal cancer surgery in The Netherlands. J Surg Oncol 99:481-487
10. Wouters MW, Karim-Kos HE, le Cessie S et al (2009) Centralization of esophageal cancer surgery: does it improve clinical outcome? Ann Surg Oncol 16:1789-1798
11. Courrech Staal EF, Aleman BM, Boot H et al (2010) Systematic review of the benefits and risks of neoadjuvant chemoradiation for oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 97:1482-1496
12. Cijs TM, Verhoef C, Steyerberg EW et al (2010) Outcome of esophagectomy for cancer in elderly patients. Ann Thorac Surg 90:900-907
13. Bech M, Kjaer T, Lauridsen J (2011) Does the number of choice sets matter? Results from a web survey applying a discrete choice experiment. Health Econ 20:273-286
14. Louviere J, Hensher DA, Swait JD (2000) Stated choice methods: analysis and application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
15. de Bekker-Grob EW, Hofman R, Donkers B et al (2010) Girls' preferences for HPV vaccination: a discrete choice experiment. Vaccine 28:6692-6697
16. Thrumurthy SG, Morris JJ, Mughal MM et al (2011) Discrete-choice preference comparison between patients and doctors for the surgical management of oesophagogastric cancer. Br J Surg 98:1124-1131; discussion 1132
17. Sculpher M, Bryan S, Fry P et al (2004) Patients' preferences for the management of non-metastatic prostate cancer: discrete choice experiment. Br Med J 328:382
18. Hol L, de Bekker-Grob EW, van Dam L et al (2010) Preferences for colorectal cancer screening strategies: a discrete choice experiment. Br J Cancer 102:972-980
19. Damen TH, de Bekker-Grob EW, Mureau MA et al (2011) Patients' preferences for breast reconstruction: a discrete choice experiment. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64:75-83