Discrete-choice preference comparison between patients and doctors for the surgical management of oesophagogastric cancer

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 98, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1124-1131

  Thrumurthy, S G ^a,b   Morris, J J A ^c   Mughal, M M ^a,b   Ward, J B ^a  

^a ROYAL PRESTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c MANCHESTER UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COUNSELING; DECISION MAKING; ESOPHAGUS TUMOR; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIOECONOMICS; STOMACH TUMOR;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COUNSELING; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; STOMACH NEOPLASMS;

EID: 79960023620     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7537     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Deans DA, Wigmore SJ, de Beaux AC, Paterson-Brown S, Garden OJ, Fearon KC,. Clinical prognostic scoring system to aid decision-making in gastro-oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 1501-1508. (Pubitemid 350275629)
2. Parameswaran R, McNair A, Avery KN, Berrisford RG, Wajed SA, Sprangers MA, et al., The role of health-related quality of life outcomes in clinical decision making in surgery for esophageal cancer: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15: 2372-2379.
3. Ryan M, Farrar S,. Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. BMJ 2000; 320: 1530-1533. (Pubitemid 30330316)
4. Ryan M,. Discrete choice experiments in health care. BMJ 2004; 328: 360-361. (Pubitemid 38241179)
5. Lagarde SM, Franssen SJ, van Werven JR, Smets EM, Tran TC, Tilanus HW, et al., Patient preferences for the disclosure of prognosis after esophagectomy for cancer with curative intent. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15: 3289-3298.
6. Biere SS, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA,. Minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg 2010; 251: 178-179; author reply 179.
7. Carr SR, Luketich JD,. Minimally invasive esophagectomy. An update on the options available. Minerva Chir 2008; 63: 481-495.
8. Blazeby JM,. How does surgery affect quality of life and symptoms for patients with esophageal cancer? Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2007; 4: 74-75. (Pubitemid 46189532)
9. van Heijl M, Sprangers MA, de Boer AG, Lagarde SM, Reitsma HB, Busch OR, et al., Preoperative and early postoperative quality of life predict survival in potentially curable patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2010; 17: 23-30.
10. Boudourakis LD, Wang TS, Roman SA, Desai R, Sosa JA,. Evolution of the surgeon-volume, patient-outcome relationship. Ann Surg 2009; 250: 159-165.
11. Gasper WJ, Glidden DV, Jin C, Way LW, Patti MG,. Has recognition of the relationship between mortality rates and hospital volume for major cancer surgery in California made a difference?: a follow-up analysis of another decade. Ann Surg 2009; 250: 472-483.
12. Salkeld G, Solomon M, Butow P, Short L,. Discrete-choice experiment to measure patient preferences for the surgical management of colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2005; 92: 742-747. (Pubitemid 40863196)
13. Shiell A, Hawe P, Seymour J,. Values and preferences are not necessarily the same. Health Econ 1997; 6: 515-518. (Pubitemid 27474921)
14. Kruijshaar ME, Essink-Bot ML, Donkers B, Looman CW, Siersema PD, Steyerberg EW,. A labelled discrete choice experiment adds realism to the choices presented: preferences for surveillance tests for Barrett esophagus. BMC Med Res Methodol 2009; 9: 31.
15. Rutegard M, Lagergren P,. No influence of surgical volume on patients' health-related quality of life after esophageal cancer resection. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15: 2380-2387.
16. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Chang AC, Lee J, Pickens A, Lau CL,. Two thousand transhiatal esophagectomies: changing trends, lessons learned. Ann Surg 2007; 246: 363-372. (Pubitemid 47312120)
17. Pennathur A, Farkas A, Krasinskas AM, Ferson PF, Gooding WE, Gibson MK, et al., Esophagectomy for T1 esophageal cancer: outcomes in 100 patients and implications for endoscopic therapy. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 87: 1048-1054.
18. Avery KN, Metcalfe C, Barham CP, Alderson D, Falk SJ, Blazeby JM,. Quality of life during potentially curative treatment for locally advanced oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 1369-1376. (Pubitemid 350144385)
19. Djärv T, Lagergren J, Blazeby JM, Lagergren P,. Long-term health-related quality of life following surgery for oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 1121-1126.
20. Lagergren P, Avery KN, Hughes R, Barham CP, Alderson D, Falk SJ, et al., Health-related quality of life among patients cured by surgery for esophageal cancer. Cancer 2007; 110: 686-693. (Pubitemid 47106160)
21. Barbour AP, Lagergren P, Hughes R, Alderson D, Barham CP, Blazeby JM,. Health-related quality of life among patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastro-oesophageal junction treated by gastrectomy or oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 80-84. (Pubitemid 351184918)
22. RutegÃrd M, Lagergren J, Rouvelas I, Lindblad M, Blazeby JM, Lagergren P,. Population-based study of surgical factors in relation to health-related quality of life after oesophageal cancer resection. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 592-601.
23. Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, Chang KJ, Gray J, Hoyt D,. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: lessons learned from 104 operations. Ann Surg 2008; 248: 1081-1091.
24. Parameswaran R, Blazeby JM, Hughes R, Mitchell K, Berrisford RG, Wajed SA,. Health-related quality of life after minimally invasive oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 525-531.
25. Qureshi I, Nason KS, Luketich JD,. Is minimally invasive esophagectomy indicated for cancer? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2008; 8: 1449-1460.
26. Safranek PM, Cubitt J, Booth MI, Dehn TC,. Review of open and minimal access approaches to oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 1845-1853.
27. Branagan G, Davies N,. Early impact of centralization of oesophageal cancer surgery services. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 1630-1632. (Pubitemid 39619928)
28. Killeen SD, O'Sullivan MJ, Coffey JC, Kirwan WO, Redmond HP,. Provider volume and outcomes for oncological procedures. Br J Surg 2005; 92: 389-402. (Pubitemid 40523899)
29. Stewart GD, Long G, Tulloh BR,. Surgical service centralisation in Australia versus choice and quality of life for rural patients. Med J Aust 2006; 185: 162-163. (Pubitemid 44262803)
30. Al-Refaie WB, Parsons HM, Henderson WG, Jensen EH, Tuttle TM, Vickers SM, et al., Major cancer surgery in the elderly: results from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 2010; 251: 311-338.