The inescapability of knowing and inability to not know in the digital society

The Right to Know and the Right Not to Know: Genetic Privacy and Responsibility

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 180-195

  Watermeyer, Richard ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84940668896     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/9781139875981.016     Document Type: Chapter

References (51)

1. Andersson, E., Warburton, D. and Wilson, R. 2005. The True Costs of Public Participation. London. Involve.
2. Bauer, M. W., Allum, N. and Miller, S. 2007. What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Public Understanding of Science 16(1): 79-95.
3. Bauman, Z. 2000, Liquid Modernity, Malden, MA: Polity.
4. Bonney, R. and LaBranche, M. 2004. ‘Citizen science: Involving the public in research’, ASTC Dimensions May/June: 13.
5. Bourdieu, P. 1998, Practical Reason, Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.
6. Bucchi, M. 2009, Beyond Technocracy: Science, politics and citizens, New York, Springer.
7. Burawoy, M. 2005, ‘2004 American Sociological Association Presidential Address: For public sociology’, British Journal of Sociology 56(2): 259-94.
8. Castells, M. 2000, The Rise of the Network Society. The information age: Economy, society and culture. Vol. 1, 2nd edn. Oxford, Blackwell.
9. Chalmers, M. 2009. ‘Communicating physics in the information age’, in Holliman, R., Thomas, J., Smidt, S., Scanlon, E., and Whitelegg, E. (eds.) Practising Science Communication in the Information Age, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 67-80.
10. Collins, H. and Evans, R. 2002, ‘The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience’, Social Studies of Science 32(2): 235-96.
11. Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. (eds.) 2001, Participation: The new tyranny, London, Zed Books.
12. Dunleavy, P. 2012. ‘Introduction from the LSE Impact of Social Science Project Team’ paper presented at From Research to Policy: Academic Impacts on Government Conference, 12 March 2012 at the Institute for Government, London, UK. Available at: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2012/03/29/resources-research-to-policy/(accessed 21 November 2013).
13. Durant, J. 1999, ‘Participatory technology assessment and the democratic model of the public understanding of science’, Science and Public Policy 26, 313-19.
14. Durodie, B. 2003, ‘Limitations of pubic dialogue in science and the rise of the “new experts”’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6(4): 82-92.
15. Fiorino, D. J. 1990, ‘Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms’, Science, Technology and Human Values 15(2): 226-43.
16. Fischer, F. 2005. ‘Are scientists irrational? Risk assessment in practical reason’, in Leach, M., Scoones, I., andWynne, B. (eds.) Science and Citizens: Globalisation and the challenge of engagement, London, Zed Books, pp. 54-65.
17. Fuchs, C. 2007, ‘Transnational space and the “network society”,, 21st Century Society 2(1): 49-78.
18. Funtowicz, S. O. and Ravetz, J. R. 1992. ‘Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science’, in Krimsky, S. and Golding, D. (eds.) Social Theories of Risk, Westport, CT, Praeger, pp. 251-74.
19. Gartner, R. 2009. ‘From print to online: Developments in access to scientific innovation’, in Holliman, R., Thomas, J., Smidt, S., Scanlon, E. and Whitelegg, E. (eds.) Practising Science Communication in the Information Age, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 98-111.
20. Gregory, J and Miller, S. 1998, Science in Public: Communication, culture and credibility, Cambridge, MA, Perseus.
21. Haider, J. and Bawden, D. 2007, ‘Conceptions of “information poverty” in LIS: A discourse analysis’, Journal of Documentation 63(4): 534-57.
22. House of Lords, Select Committee on Science and Technology 2000, Science and Society - 3rd Report, London, HMSO.
23. Irwin, A. 1995, Citizen Science, London, Routledge.
24. Irwin, A. 2006, ‘The politics of talk: Coming to terms with the “new” scientific governance’, Social Studies of Science 36(2): 299-320.
25. Irwin, A. and Wynne, B. (eds.) 1996, Misunderstanding Science: The public reconstruction of science and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Jasanoff, S. 2005, Designs on Nature: Science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
27. Lehr, J. L., McCallie, E., Davies, S. R., Caron, B. R., Gammon, B. and Duensing, S. 2007, ‘The role and value of dialogue events as sites of informal science learning’, International Journal of Science Education 29(12): 1-21.
28. Marris, C., Wynne, B., Simmons, P. and Weldon, S. 2001, Public Perceptions of Agricultural Biotechnologies in Europe (PABE) Final Report. Available at: http://csec.lancs.ac.uk/archive/pabe/docs/pabe_finalreport.pdf (accessed 18 November 2013).
29. Meeker, M. and Liang, W. 2013. Internet Trends. Available at: www.kpcb.com/insights/2013-internet-trends (accessed 18 November 2013).
30. Oakley, P. 1991, Projects with People. The practice of participation in rural development. Geneva: International Labour Office.
31. Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (POST) 2006. ‘Debating science’, Postnote Number 260. Available at: www.parliament.uk/documents/post/postpn260.pdf (accessed 18 November 2013).
32. Pellizzoni, L. 2003a. ‘Uncertainty and participatory democracy, Environmental Values 12(2): 195-224.
33. Pellizzoni, L. 2003b. ‘Knowledge, uncertainty and the transformation of the public sphere’, European Journal of Social Theory 6(3): 327-55.
34. Priest, S. H. 2009. ‘Reinterpreting the audiences for media messages about science’, in Holliman, R., Whitelegg, E., Scanlon, E., Smidt, S. and Thomas, J. (eds.) Investigating Science Communication in the Information Age: Implications for public engagement and popular media, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 223-36.
35. Rathouse, K. and Devine-Wright, P. 2010, Evaluation of the Big Energy Shift, Final report to DECC and Sciencewise-ERC, London, Sciencewise.
36. Rogers-Hayden, T. and Pidgeon, N. F. 2007, ‘Moving engagement “upstream”? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering inquiry’, Public Understanding of Science 16, 346-64.
37. Royal Society 2006, Science Communication: Survey of factors affecting science communication by scientists and engineers. Available at: https://royalsociety.org/~Zmedia/Royal_Society_Content/policy/publications/2006/1111111395.pdf (accessed 18 November 2013).
38. Stehr, N. 2002. Knowledge and Economic Conduct, Toronto, University of Toronto Press.
39. Stilgoe, J. and Wilsdon, J. 2009. ‘The new politics of engagement with science’, in Holliman, R., Whitelegg, E., Scanlon, E., Smidt, S. and Thomas, J. (eds.) Investigating Science Communication in the Information Age: Implications for public engagement and popular media. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 18-34.
40. Stirling, A. 2006, GoverScience Seminar 2005 - Outcome:From Science and Society to Science in Society: Towards a framework for ‘co-operative research Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
41. Taverne, D. 2005, The March of Unreason: Science, democracy, and the new fundamentalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Trench, B. 2009. ‘Science reporting in the electronic embrace of the Internet’, in Holliman, R., Whitelegg, E., Scanlon, E., Smidt, S. and Thomas, J. (eds.) Investigating Science Communication in the Information Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 166-80.
43. Van Dijk, J. 2006. The Network Society. London: Sage.
44. Warner, M. 2005. Publics and Counterpublics. Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books.
45. Watermeyer, R. 2010. ‘Social network science: Pedagogy, dialogue and deliberation’, Journal of Science Communication (Jcom) 9(1): 1-9.
46. Watson, D. 2007. Managing Civic and Community Engagement. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
47. Wilsdon, J. 2004. ‘Science is moving upstream’, Science and Public Affairs December: 11.
48. Wilsdon, J. and Willis, R. 2004. See-Through Science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream. London: Demos.
49. Wilsdon, J. Wynne, B. and Stilgoe, J. 2005. The Public Value of Science: Or how to ensure that science really matters. London: Demos.
50. Wynne, B. 1996. ‘May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expertlay knowledge divide’, in Lash. S. Szerszynshi B. and Wynne. B. Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a new ecology. London. Sage Publications. pp. 44-83.
51. Wynne, B. 2003. ‘Seasick on the Third Wave? Subverting the hegemony of propositionalism’, Social Studies of Science 33(3): 401-17.