Modeling the influence of situational and attitudinal variables on lay responses to violent sexual and non-sexual offenders

American Journal of Forensic Psychology

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 35-58

  Rodriguez, Dario N ^a   Berry, Melissa A ^a   Gresley, Jamee L ^a  

^a Knox Community Hospital ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRIME VICTIM; CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR; DEPENDENT VARIABLE; DISGUST; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; ILLINOIS RAPE MYTH ACCEPTANCE SCALE; LITERATURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MODIFIED SOCIAL DISTANCE SCALE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RAPE; SCORING SYSTEM; SEXUAL CRIME; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL DISTANCE;

EID: 84940667960     PISSN: 07331290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bandura A: Human agency in social cognitive theory. Am Psychologist 1989; 44:1175-1184
2. Salerno JM, Najdowski CJ, Stevenson MC, Wiley TRA, Bottoms BL, Vaca, Jr. R, Pimental PS: Psychological mechanisms underlying support for juvenile sex offender registry laws: prototypes, moral outrage, and perceived threat. Beh Sci and Law 2010; 28:58-83
3. Ramchand R, MacDonald JM, Haviland A, Morral AR: A developmental approach for measuring severity of crimes. J Quant Criminology 2009; 25:129-153
4. Brems C, Wagner P: Blame of victim and perpetrator in rape versus theft. J Soc Psychology 1994; 134:363-374
5. Sizemore OJ: The role of perpetrator motivation in two crime scenarios. J Interpersonal Violence 2013; 28:80-91
6. LaFond JQ: Preventing Sexual Violence: How Society Should Cope with Sex Offenders. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association 2005
7. Grubb A, Harrower J: Attribution of blame in cases of rape: analysis of participant gender, type of rape and perceived similarity to the victim. Aggression Violent Beh 2008; 13:396-405
8. Krahé B, Temkin J, Bieneck S: Schema-driven information processing in judgments about rape. Applied Cog Psychology 2011; 21:601-619
9. Cowan G: Beliefs about the cases of four types of rape. Sex Roles 2000; 42:807-823
10. Bieneck S, Krahé B: Blaming the victim and exonerating the perpetrator in cases of rape and robbery: Is there a double standard? J Interpersonal Violence 2011; 26:1785-1797
11. Sahl D, Keene JR: The effects of age, authority, and gender on perceptions of statutory rape offenders. J Interpersonal Violence 2012; 27:3701-3722
12. MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Adolescent Development and Juvenile Justice: Issue brief 3: Less guilty by reason of adolescence, 2006; http://www.adjj.org/downloads/6093issue-brief-3.pdf
13. Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551, 2005
14. Burt MR: Cultural myths and support for rape. J Personality Soc Psychology 1980; 38:217-230
15. Rubin Z, Peplau LA: Who believes in a just world? J Social Issues 1975; 31:65-89
16. Suarez E, Gadalla TM: Stop blaming the victim: a meta-analysis on rape myths. J Interpersonal Violence 2010; 25:2010-2035
17. Anderson KB, Cooper H, Okamura L: Individual differences and attitudes toward rape: a meta-analytic review. Personality Soc Psychology Bulletin 1997; 23:295-315
18. Hammond EM, Berry MA, Rodriguez DN: The influence of rape myth acceptance, sexual attitudes, and belief in a just world on attributions of responsibility in a date rape scenario. Legal Crim Psychology 2011; 16:242-252
19. Kleinke CL, Meyer C: Evaluation of rape victim by men and women with high and low belief in a just world. Psychology Women Quarterly 1990; 14:343-353
20. van den Bos K, Maas M: Psychology of belief in a just world: exploring experiential and rationalistic paths to victim blaming. Personality Soc Psychology Bulletin 2009; 35:1567-1578
21. Kurzban R, Leary MR: Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: the functions of social exclusion. Psychological Bulletin 2001; 127:187-208
22. Horberg EJ, Keltner D, Oveis C, Cohen AB: Disgust and moralization of purity. J Personality Soc Psychology 2009; 97:963-976
23. Hirschfield PJ, Piquero AR: Normalization and legitimation: modeling stigmatizing attitudes toward ex-offenders. Criminology 2010; 48:27-55
24. Clow KA, Esses VM: Expectancy effects in social stereotyping: automatic and controlled processing in the Neely paradigm. Canadian J Beh Sci 2007; 39:161-173
25. Fiske ST, Cuddy AJC, Glick P, Xu J: A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. J Personality Soc Psychology 2002; 82:878-90
26. Buckels EE, Trapnell PD: Disgust facilitates outgroup dehumanization. Group Processes Intergroup Relations 2013; 16:771-780
27. Park JH, Faulkner J, Schaller M: Evolved disease-avoidance processes and contemporary anti-social behavior: prejudicial attitudes and avoidance of people with physical disabilities. J Nonverbal Beh 2003; 27:65-87
28. Salerno JM, Peter-Hagene LC: The interactive effect of anger and disgust on moral outrage and judgments. Psych Sci 2013; 24:2069-2078
29. Bright DA, Goodman-Delahunty J: The influence of gruesome verbal evidence on mock juror verdicts. Psychiatry Psychology Law 2004; 11:154-166
30. Shechory M, Idisis Y: Rape myths and social distance toward sex offenders and victims among therapists and students. Sex Roles 2006; 54:651-658
31. Cumming G: Understanding the New Statistics: Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Meta-Analysis. New York, Routledge, 2012
32. hme JM, Mitte K: Evaluation of a German state disgust scale. Euro J Psych Assessment 2009; 25:150-156
33. Thompson AM, Molina OR, Levett LM: After exoneration: an investigation of stigma and wrongfully convicted persons. Albany Law Rev 2011; 75:1373-1413
34. Payne DL, Lonsway KA, Fitzgerald LF: Rape myth acceptance: exploration of its structure and its measurements using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. J Res Personality 1999; 33:27-68
35. Lance CE: Residual centering, exploratory and confirmatory moderator analysis, and decomposition of effects in path models containing interactions. App Psych Measurement 1988; 12:163-175
36. Hayes AF: Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. New York, Guilford Press, 2013
37. Perkins DD, Long DA: Neighborhood sense of community and social capital: a multi-level analysis, in Psychological Sense of Community: Research, Applications, and Implications. Edited by Fisher AT, Sonn CC, Bishops BJ. New York, Plenum, 2002
38. Schachter S, Singer JE: Cognitive, social and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psych Rev 1968; 69:379-399
39. Festinger, L: A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, IL, Row Peterson, 1957
40. Rodriguez DN, Strange D: False memories for dissonance inducing events. Memory 2015; 23:203-212
41. Simmons JP, Nelson LD, Simonsohn U: False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psych Sci 2011; 22:1359-1366
42. Berkowitz A: College men as perpetrators of acquaintance rape and sexual assault: a review of recent research. J Am College Health 1992; 40:175-181