Psychological mechanisms underlying support for juvenile sex offender registry laws: Prototypes, moral outrage, and perceived threat

Behavioral Sciences and the Law

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 58-83

  Salerno, Jessica M ^a   Najdowski, Cynthia J ^a   Stevenson, Margaret C ^b   Wiley, Tisha R A ^a   Bottoms, Bette L ^a   Vaca, Roberto ^a   Pimentel, Pamela S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CHILD; HUMAN; JUVENILE DELINQUENCY; LEGAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUBLIC OPINION; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGISTER; SEXUAL CRIME; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; ATTITUDE; CHILD; HUMANS; ILLINOIS; JUVENILE DELINQUENCY; PUBLIC OPINION; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGISTRIES; SEX OFFENSES;

EID: 76149102633     PISSN: 07353936     EISSN: 10990798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bsl.921     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Adam Walsh Child Protection and Child Safety Act (2006). 42 U.S.C. § 16911(2006) Pub. L. No. 109-248, 120 Stat. 587 (codified in various sections of 42 U.S.C.).
2. Adkins, G., Huff, D., & Stageberg, P. (2000). The Iowa sex offender registry and recidivism. Des Moines: Iowa Department of Human Rights.
3. Alexander, M. A. (1999). Sexual offender treatment efficacy revisited. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, 101-116.
4. Applegate, B. K., Cullen, F. T., Turner, M. G., & Sundt, J. L. (1996). Assessing public support for three-strikes- and-you're-out laws: Global versus specific attitudes. Crime and Delinquency, 42, 517-534.
5. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
6. Bornstein, B. (1999). The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior, 23, 75-91.
7. Brank, E. M., Hays, S. A., & Weisz, V. (2006). All parents are to blame (except this one): Global versus specific attitudes related to parental responsibility laws. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 2670-2684.
8. Brenton, S. (2008, May 28). Fallon Campaign: Sex offender law makes children less safe - Fallon was right! [Press release]. Retrieved on March 9, 2009, fromwww.iowapolitics.com.
9. Caldwell, M. F. (2009). Study characteristics and recidivism base rates in juvenile sex offender recidivism. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. Retrieved June 12, 2009, from http://ijo.sagepub. com/cgi/content/abstract/0306624X08330016vl. DOI: 10.1177/0306624X08330016.
10. Caputo, A. A., & Brodsky, S. L. (2004). Citizen coping with community notification of released sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 22, 239-252.
11. Carlsmith, K.M., Darley, J. M., & Robinson, P.H. (2002). Why do we punish?: Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 284-299.
12. Cauffman, E., & Steinberg, L. (2000). (Im)maturity of judgment in adolescence: Why adolescents may be less culpable than adults. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 741-760.
13. Chaffin, M. (2008). Our minds are made up-Don't confuse us with the facts: Commentary on policies concerning children with sexual behavior problems and juvenile sex offenders. Child Maltreatment, 13, 110-121.
14. Darley, J. M., Carlsmith, K. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2000). Incapacitation and just deserts as motives for punishment. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 659-683.
15. Finkel, N. J., & Groscup, J. L. (1997). Crime prototypes, objective versus subjective culpability, and a commonsense balance. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 209-230.
16. Goldsmith, S. (2007, July 22). Unruly schoolboys or sex offenders. The Oregonian, p. A01.
17. Haegerich, T. M., & Bottoms, B. L. (2004, March). Effect of jurors' stereotypes of juvenile offenders on pre- and post-deliberation case judgments. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, Scottsdale, AZ.
18. Hanson, R. K., & Bussiere, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
19. Illinois State Police. (2006). A guide to sex offender registration and community notification in Illinois. Retrieved on October 27, 2009, from http://www.isp.state.il.us/docs/4-084d.pdf.
20. Kernsmith, P. D., Craun, S. W., & Foster, J. (2009). Public attitudes toward sexual offenders and sex offender registration. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 18, 290-301.
21. Krahé, B. (1991). Police officers' definitions of rape: A prototype study. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 223-244.
22. Letourneau, E. J., & Armstrong, K. S. (2008). Recidivism rates for registered and nonregistered juvenile sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 20, 393-408.
23. Letourneau, E. J., Bandyopadhyay, D., Sinha, D., &Armstrong, K. (2009). Effects of sex offender registration policies on juvenile justice decision making. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21, 149-165.
24. Letourneau, E. J., &Miner, M. (2005). Juvenile sex offenders: A case against the legal and clinical status quo. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 293-312.
25. Levenson, J., Brannon, Y., Fortney, T., & Baker, J. (2007a). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7, 1-25.
26. Levenson, J., & Cotter, L. (2005). The effect of Megan's law on sex offender reintegration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21, 49-66.
27. Levenson, J. S., D'Amora, D. A., & Hern, A. L. (2007b). Megan's Law and its impact on community re-entry for sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 25, 587-602.
28. Levesque, R. J. (1996). Is there still a place for violent youth in juvenile justice? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 1, 69-79.
29. 'Megan's Law' mom criticizes 'sexting' charges. (2009, March 26). National Public Radio. Retrieved on May 27, 2009, from http://www.npr.org/ templates/story/story.php?storyId=102399198.
30. Moon, M. M., Sundt, J. L., Cullen, F. T., & Wright, J. P. (2000). Is child saving dead? Public support for juvenile rehabilitation. Crime and Delinquency, 46, 38-60.
31. No Easy Answers: Sex Offender Laws in the US. (2007, September). Human Rights Watch, 19. Retrieved on January 7, 2009, from http://www.hrw.org/en/ reports/2007/09/11/no-easy-answers.
32. Phillips, D. (1998). Community notification as viewed by Washington's citizens. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
33. Proctor, J. L., Badzinski, D. M., & Johnson, J. (2002). The impact of media on knowledge and perceptions of Megan's Law. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 13, 356-379.
34. Proeve, M. J., & Howells, K. (2006). Effects of remorse and shame and criminal justice experience on judgments about a sex offender. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 12, 145-161.
35. Quinn, J. F., Forsyth, C. J., & Mullen-Quinn, C. (2004). Societal reaction to sex offenders: A review of the origins and results of the myths surrounding their crimes and treatment amenability. Deviant Behavior, 25, 215-232.
36. Redlich, A. D. (2001). Community notification: Perceptions of its effectiveness in preventing child sexual abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 10, 91-116.
37. Reppucci, N. D., Michel, J. L., & Kostelnik, J. O. (2009). Challenging juvenile transfer: Faulty assumptions and misguided policies. In B. L. Bottoms, C. J. Najdowski, & G. S. Goodman (Eds.), Children as victims, witnesses, and offenders: Psychological science and the law (pp. 295-312). New York: Guilford.
38. Robbers, M. L. P. (2009). Lifers on the outside: Sex offenders and disintegrative shaming. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53, 5-28.
39. Sahlstrom, K. J., & Jeglic, E. L. (2008). Factors affecting attitudes toward juvenile sex offenders. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 17, 180-196.
40. Salerno, J. M., Stevenson, M. C., Wiley, T. R. A., Najdowski, C. J., Bottoms, B. L., & Doran, R. A. (2010). Public attitudes toward applying sex offender registration laws to juvenile offenders. In J.M. Lampinen, & K. Sexton-Radek (Eds.), Protecting children from violence: Evidence based interventions. New York: Psychology.
41. Sample, L. L., & Kadleck, C. (2008). Sex offender laws: Legislators' accounts of the need for policy. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19, 40-62.
42. Sandler, J. C., Freeman, N. J., & Socia, K. M. (2008). Does a watched pot boil? A time-series analysis of New York State's sex offender registration and notification law. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 14, 284-302.
43. Schiavone, S. K., & Jeglic, E. L. (2008). Public perception of sex offender social policies and the impact on sex offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53, 679-695.
44. Schram, D. D., &Milloy, C. D. (1995). Community notification: A study of offender characteristics and recidivism. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
45. Scott, E., Reppucci, N., Antonishak, J., & DeGennaro, J. (2006). Public attitudes about the culpability and punishment of young offenders. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 24, 815-832.
46. Sickmund, M. (2009). Delinquency cases in juvenile court 2005.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
47. Skitka, L. J. (2002). Do the means always justify the ends, or do the ends sometimes justify the means? A value model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 588-597.
48. Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C. W., & Mullen, E. (2004). Political tolerance and coming to psychological closure following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks: An integrative approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 743-756.
49. Skitka, L. J., &Mullen, E. (2002). Understanding judgments of fairness in a real-world political context:A test of the value protection model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1419-1429.
50. Smith, V. L. (1991). Prototypes in the courtroom: Lay representations of legal concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 857-872.
51. Stalans, L. J. (1993). Citizen's crime stereotypes, biased recall, and punishment preferences in abstract cases: The educative role of interpersonal sources. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 451-470.
52. Stalans, L. J., & Diamond, S. S. (1990). Formation and change in lay evaluation of criminal sentencing. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 199-214.
53. Stevenson, M. C., Sorenson, K. M., Smith, A. C., Sekely, A., & Dzwairo, R. A. (2009). Effects of defendant and victim race on perceptions of juvenile sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 27, 957-979.
54. Stockinger, J. (2009, March 26). Nude photos at St. Charles East lead to arrest. Daily Herald. Retrieved on March 31, 2009, from http://www.dailyherald. com/story/?id=281904&src=5.
55. Tewksbury, R. (2005). Collateral consequences of sex offender registration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21, 67-81.
56. Tewksbury, R., & Lees, M. (2006). Perceptions of sex offender registration: Collateral consequences and community experiences. Sociological Spectrum, 26, 309-334.
57. Trivits, L., & Reppucci, N. (2002). Application of Megan's Law to juveniles. American Psychologist, 57, 690-704.
58. U.S. Department of Justice. (June, 2007). Criminal offender statistics. (Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics). Retrieved on June 26, 2009, from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/crimoff.htm.
59. Vidal, S., & Skeem, J. L. (2007). Effect of psychopathy, abuse, and ethnicity on juvenile probation officers' decision-making and supervision strategies. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 479-498.
60. Weiner, B. (2006). Social motivation, justice, and the moral emotions: An attributional approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. Wiley, T. R. A., & Bottoms, B. L. (2009). Effects of defendant sexual orientation on jurors' perceptions of child sexual assault. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 46-60.
62. Wilson v. State. 279 Ga. App. 459 (2006).
63. Zamble, E., & Kalm, K. L. (1990). General and specific measures of public attitudes toward sentencing. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 22, 327-337.