Making the best of a bad situation: Host partial resistance and bypass of behavioral manipulation by parasites?

Trends in Parasitology

Volumn 31, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 413-418

  Daoust, Simon P ^a   King, Kayla C ^b   Brodeur, Jacques ^c   Roitberg, Bernard D ^d   Roche, Benjamin ^e,f   Thomas, Frédéric ^e  

^a JOHN ABBOTT COLLEGE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^d SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e Université Pierre et Marie Curie   (France)

^f University de Montpellier   (France)

Author keywords

Manipulation; Parasites; Phenotype; Resistance

Indexed keywords

DEATH; ECOLOGY; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; HOST RESISTANCE; INFESTATION; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NATURAL SELECTION; NONHUMAN; PREVALENCE; REVIEW; ANIMAL; BEHAVIOR CONTROL; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR CONTROL; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTIONS; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84940595845     PISSN: 14714922     EISSN: 14715007     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2015.05.007     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Poulin R. Parasite manipulation of host behavior: an update and frequently asked questions. Adv. Study Behav. 2010, 41:151-186.
2. Moore J. Parasites and the Behavior of Animals 2002, Oxford University Press.
3. Lefèvre T., et al. Invasion of the body snatchers: the diversity and evolution of manipulative strategies in host-parasite Interactions. Adv. Parasitol. 2009, 68:45-83.
4. Thomas F., et al. Parasitic manipulation: where are we and where should we go?. Behav. Process. 2005, 68:185-200.
5. Poulin R., Levri E.P. Applied aspects of host manipulation by parasites. Host Manipulation by Parasites 2012, 172-194. Oxford University Press. D. Hughes (Ed.).
6. Thomas F., et al. Host manipulation by parasites: a multidimensional phenomenon. Oikos 2010, 119:1217-1223.
7. Benesh D., et al. Multidimensionality and intra-individual variation in host manipulation by an acanthocephalan. Parasitology 2008, 135:617-626.
8. Maure F., et al. Diversity and evolution of bodyguard manipulation. J. Exp. Biol. 2012, 216:36-42.
9. Parker G.A., et al. When should a trophically transmitted parasite manipulate its host?. Evolution 2009, 63:448-458.
10. Cezilly F., Perrot-Minnot M.J. Interpreting multidimensionality in parasite-induced phenotypic alterations: panselectionism versus parsimony. Oikos 2010, 119:1224-1229.
11. Hughes D.P., et al. Host Manipulation by Parasites 2012, Oxford University Press.
12. Cézilly F., Perrot-Minnot M.J. Studying adaptive changes in the behaviour of infected hosts: a long and winding road. Behav. Process. 2005, 68:223-228.
13. Cézilly F., et al. Multidimensionality in parasite-induced phenotypic alterations: ultimate versus procimate aspects. J. Exp. Biol. 2013, 216:27-35.
14. Poulin R., et al. Parasite manipulation of host behaviour: Should hosts always lose?. Oikos 1994, 70:479-484.
15. Thomas F., et al. Intraspecific variability in host manipulation by parasites. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2011, 11:262-269.
16. Lefèvre T., et al. Exploiting host compensatory responses: the 'must' of manipulation?. Trends Parasitol. 2008, 24:435-439.
17. Ponton F., et al. Facultative virulence: a strategy to manipulate host behaviour?. Behav. Process. 2006, 72:1-5.
18. Thomas F., et al. Infection syndrome and multidimensionality: two terms for two different issues. Oikos 2010, 119:1230.
19. Hart B.L. Behavioural defense against parasites: interaction with parasite invasiveness. Parasitology 1994, 109:S139-S151.
20. Medzhitov R., et al. Disease tolerance as a defense strategy. Science 2012, 335:936-941.
21. Rausher M.D. Co-evolution and plant resistance to natural enemies. Nature 2001, 411:857-864.
22. Baucom R.S., Mauricio R. Constraints on the evolution of tolerance to herbicide in the common morning glory: resistance and tolerance are mutually exclusive. Evolution 2008, 62:2842-2854.
23. Råberg L., et al. Disentangling genetic variation for resistance and tolerance to infectious diseases in animals. Science 2007, 318:812-814.
24. Lefèvre T., et al. Defence strategies against a parasitoid wasp in Drosophila: fight or flight?. Biol. Lett. 2011, 8:230-233.
25. Lefèvre T., et al. Genetic variation in resistance, but not tolerance, to a protozoan parasite in the monarch butterfly. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2011, 278:751-759.
26. Franceschi N., et al. Variation between populations and local adaptation in acanthocephalan-induced parasite manipulation. Evolution 2010, 64:2417-2430.
27. Minchella D.J., Loverde P.T. A cost of increased early reproductive effort in the snail Biomphalaria glabrata. Am. Nat. 1981, 118:876-881.
28. Agnew P., et al. Host life history responses to parasitism. Microbes Infect. 2000, 2:891-896.
29. Helluy S. Un mode de favorisation de la transmission parasitaire: la manipulation du comportement de l'hôte intermédiaire. Revue d'Écologie 1983, 38:211-213.
30. Helluy S. Relations hôtes-parasites du trématode Microphallus papillorobustus (Rankin, 1940). III: Facteurs impliqués dans les modifications du comportement des Gammarus hôtes intermédiaires et tests de prédation. Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparée 1984, 59:41-56.
31. Helluy S. Host-parasite relations of the trematode Microphallus papillorobustus (Rankin, 1940). II-Changes in the behavior of Gammarus intermediate hosts and localization of metacercaria. Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparée 1983, 58:1-17.
32. Inman A.J., Krebs J. Predation and group living. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1987, 2:31-32.
33. Kullman H., et al. Fish odour triggers conspecific attraction behaviour in an aquatic invertebrate. Biol. Lett. 2008, 4:458-460.
34. Thomas F., et al. The influence of intensity of infection by a trematode parasite on the reproductive biology of Gammarus insensibilis (Amphipoda). Int. J. Parasitol. 1996, 26:1205-1209.
35. Roff D.A. Evolution of Life Histories: Theory and Analysis 1992, Springer.
36. Poulin R., et al. The true cost of host manipulation by parasites. Behav. Process. 2005, 68:241-244.
37. Maure F., et al. The cost of a bodyguard. Biol. Lett. 2011, 7:843-846.
38. Wolinska J., King K.C. Environment can alter selection in host-parasite interactions. Trends Parasitol. 2009, 25:236-244.
39. Thompson J.N. The Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution 2005, University of Chicago Press.
40. Thompson J.N. Specific hypotheses on the geographic mosaic of coevolution. Am. Nat. 1999, 153:S1-S14.
41. Jaenike J. An hypothesis to account for the maintenance of sex within populations. Evol. Theor. 1978, 3:191-194.
42. Hamilton W.D. Sex versus non-sex versus parasite. Oikos 1980, 35:282-290.
43. Bell G. The Masterpiece of Nature: the Evolution and Genetics of Sexuality 1982, Springer.
44. Bordenstein S.R., Werren J.H. Effects of A and B Wolbachia and host genotype on interspecies cytoplasmic incompatibility in Nasonia. Genetics 1998, 148:1833-1844.
45. Werren J.H. Wolbachia and speciation. Endless Forms: Species and Speciation 1998, 245-260. Oxford University Press. D. Howard, S. Berlocher (Eds.).
46. Svensson E.I., Råberg L. Resistance and tolerance in animal enemy-victim coevolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010, 25:267-274.
47. Little T.J., et al. The coevolution of virulence: tolerance in perspective. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6:e1001006.
48. Miller M.R., et al. The evolution of parasites in response to tolerance in their hosts: the good, the bad, and apparent commensalism. Evolution 2006, 60:945-956.
49. Roy B., Kirchner J. Evolutionary dynamics of pathogen resistance and tolerance. Evolution 2000, 54:51-63.
50. Poulin R. Hairworms (Nematomorpha: Gordioidea) infecting New Zealand short-horned grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae). J. Parasitol. 1995, 81:121-122.
51. Biron D.G., et al. 'Suicide' of crickets harbouring hairworm: a proteomics investigation. Insect Mol. Biol. 2006, 15:731-742.