Laboratory Evaluation of Hemolysis and Systemic Inflammatory Response in Neonatal Nonpulsatile and Pulsatile Extracorporeal Life Support Systems

Artificial Organs

Volumn 39, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 774-781

  Wang, Shigang ^a   Krawiec, Conrad ^a   Patel, Sunil ^a   Kunselman, Allen R ^a   Song, Jianxun ^a   Lei, Fengyang ^a   Baer, Larry D ^a   Ündar, Akif ^a  

^a PENN STATE MILTON S HERSHEY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Diagonal pump; Extracorporeal life support; Hemolysis; Neonates; Nonpulsatile flow; Pulsatile flow; Roller pump; Systemic inflammatory response

Indexed keywords

LACTIC ACID; OXYGENATION; PULSATILE FLOW; PUMPS; ROLLERS (MACHINE COMPONENTS);

DIAGONAL PUMP; EXTRACORPOREAL LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS; EXTRACORPOREAL LIFE SUPPORTS; HAEMOLYSIS; INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE; NEONATE; NONPULSATILE FLOW; PULSATILES; ROLLER PUMPS; SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE;

BLOOD;

CYTOKINE; HEMOGLOBIN; INTERLEUKIN 6; INTERLEUKIN 8; LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE; LACTIC ACID; TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR ALPHA;

ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW; BLOOD GAS ANALYSIS; BLOOD SAMPLING; CHILD; EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCULATION; HEMOLYSIS; HUMAN; LABORATORY TEST; LACTATE BLOOD LEVEL; NEONATAL NONPULSATILE EXTRACORPOREAL LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS; NONPULSATILE EXTRACORPOREAL LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS; OXYGENATOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSATILE FLOW; PUMP; SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE SYNDROME; ADVERSE EFFECTS; BLOOD; DEVICES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVALUATION STUDY; EXTRACORPOREAL OXYGENATION; HEMODYNAMICS; INFLAMMATION; MICROCLIMATE; NEWBORN;

CYTOKINES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HEMOLYSIS; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFLAMMATION; LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS; PULSATILE FLOW;

EID: 84940563343     PISSN: 0160564X     EISSN: 15251594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/aor.12466     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO). January 2014 International Summary of ELSO Registry Report. Ann Arbor, Michigan, 2014.
2. Haines N, Rycus PT, Zwischenberger JB, Bartlett RH, Ündar A. Extracorporeal life support registry report 2008: neonatal and pediatric cardiac cases. ASAIO J 2009;55:111-116.
3. Vasavada R, Qiu F, Ündar A. Current status of pediatric/neonatal extracorporeal life support: clinical outcomes, circuit evolution, and translational research. Perfusion 2011;26:294-301.
4. Palanzo D, Qiu F, Baer L, Clark JB, Myers JL, Undar A. Evolution of the extracorporeal life support circuitry. Artif Organs 2010;34:869-873.
5. Palanzo D, Baer LD, El-Banayosy A, Wang S, Ündar A, Pae WE. Choosing a pump for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the United States. Artif Organs 2014;38:1-4.
6. Reed-Thurston D, Qiu F, Ündar A, Kopenhaver-Haidet K, Shenberger J. Pediatric and neonatal extracorporeal life support technology component utilization: are U.S. clinicians implementing new technology? Artif Organs 2012;36:607-615.
7. Byrnes J, McKamie W, Swearingen C, etal. Hemolysis during cardiac extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a case-control comparison of roller pumps and centrifugal pumps in a pediatric population. ASAIO J 2011;57:456-461.
8. Barrett CS, Jaggers JJ, Cook EF, etal. Outcomes of neonates undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support using centrifugal versus roller blood pumps. Ann Thorac Surg 2012;94:1635-1641.
9. Barrett CS, Jaggers JJ, Cook EF, etal. Pediatric ECMO outcomes: comparison of centrifugal versus roller blood pumps using propensity score matching. ASAIO J 2013;59:145-151.
10. Ündar A. Myths and truths of pulsatile and non-pulsatile perfusion during acute and chronic cardiac support [Invited editorial]. Artif Organs 2004;28:439-443.
11. Yu JJ, Son HS, Lim CH, etal. Comparison of myocardial loading between asynchronous pulsatile and nonpulsatile percutaneous extracorporeal life support. ASAIO J 2008;54:177-180.
12. Haines N, Wang S, Myers JL, Undar A. Comparison of two types of neonatal extracorporeal life support systems with pulsatile and nonpulsatile flow. Artif Organs 2009;33:958-966.
13. Su XW, Guan Y, Barnes M, Clark JB, Myers JL, Ündar A. Improved cerebral oxygen saturation and blood flow pulsatility with pulsatile perfusion during pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass. Pediatr Res 2011;70:181-185.
14. Akçevin A, Alkan-Bozkaya T, Qiu F, Ündar A. Evaluation of perfusion modes on vital organ recovery and thyroid hormone homeostasis in pediatric patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Artif Organs 2010;34:879-884.
15. Alkan-Bozkaya T, Akçevin A, Türkoğlu H, Ündar A. Impact of pulsatile perfusion on clinical outcomes of neonates and infants with complex pathologies undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass procedures. Artif Organs 2013;37:82-86.
16. O'Neil MP, Fleming JC, Badhwar A, Guo LR. Pulsatile versus nonpulsatile flow during cardiopulmonary bypass: microcirculatory and systemic effects. Ann Thorac Surg 2012;94:2046-2053.
17. Baraki H, Gohrbandt B, Del Bagno B, Haverich A, Boethig D, Kutschka I. Does pulsatile perfusion improve outcome after cardiac surgery? A propensity-matched analysis of 1959 patients. Perfusion 2012;27:166-174.
18. Fleck T, Benk C, Klemm R, etal. First serial in vivo results of mechanical circulatory support in children with a new diagonal pump. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013;44:828-835.
19. Tiedge S, Optenhöfel J. First uses of a new diagonal pump in extracorporeal support systems for children and infants (German). Kardiotechnik 2011;20:72-76.
20. Adedayo P, Wang S, Kunselman AR, Undar A. Impact of pulsatile flow settings on hemodynamic energy levels using the novel diagonal Medos DP3 pump in a simulated pediatric extracorporeal life support system. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 2014;5:440-448.
21. Wang S, Kunselman AR, Ündar A. Novel pulsatile diagonal pump for pediatric extracorporeal life support system. Artif Organs 2013;37:37-47.
22. Krawiec C, Wang S, Kunselman AR, Ündar A. Impact of pulsatile flow on hemodynamic energy in a Medos Deltastream DP3 pediatric extracorporeal life support system. Artif Organs 2014;38:19-27.
23. Evenson A, Wang S, Kunselman AR, Ündar A. Use of a novel diagonal pump in an in-vitro neonatal pulsatile extracorporeal life support circuit. Artif Organs 2014;38:E1-9.
24. Wang S, Evenson A, Chin BJ, Kunselman AR, Undar A. Evaluation of conventional nonpulsatile and novel pulsatile extracorporeal life support systems in a simulated pediatric extracorporeal life support model. Artif Organs 2014;39:E1-9.
25. Shepard RB, Simpson DC, Sharp JF. Energy equivalent pressure. Arch Surg 1966;93:730-740.
26. Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, Ware JH. Applied Longitudinal Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
27. Gbadegesin R, Zhao S, Charpie J, Brophy PD, Smoyer WE, Lin JJ. Significance of hemolysis on extracorporeal life support after cardiac surgery in children. Pediatr Nephrol 2009;24:589-595.
28. Lou S, MacLaren G, Best D, Delzoppo C, Butt W. Hemolysis in pediatric patients receiving centrifugal-pump extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes. Crit Care Med 2014;42:1213-1220.
29. Toomasian JM, Bartlett RH. Hemolysis and ECMO pumps in the 21st Century. Perfusion 2011;26:5-6.
30. Cornelius AM, Riley JB, Schears GJ, Burkhart HM. Plasma-free hemoglobin levels in advanced vs. conventional infant and pediatric extracorporeal life support circuits. J Extra Corpor Technol 2013;45:21-25.
31. Meyer AD, Wiles AA, Rivera O, etal. Hemolytic and thrombocytopathic characteristics of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation systems at simulated flow rate for neonates. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2012;13:e255-261.
32. Patel S, Wang S, Pauliks L, etal. Evaluation of a novel pulsatile extracorporeal life support system synchronized to the cardiac cycle: effect of rhythm changes on hemodynamic performance. Artif Organs 2015;39:67-76.
33. Wang S, Kunselman AR, Clark JB, Ündar A. In vitro hemodynamic evaluation of a novel pulsatile ECLS system: impact of perfusion modes and circuit components on energy loss. Artif Organs 2015;39:59-66.