On the use of gradients in Kriging surrogate models

Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference

Volumn 2015-January, Issue , 2015, Pages 2692-2701

  Ulaganathan, Selvakumar ^a   Couckuyt, Ivo ^a   Dhaene, Tom ^a   Laermans, Eric ^a   Degroote, Joris ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION;

ANALYTICAL FUNCTIONS; COMPUTATION INTENSIVES; COMPUTATION TIME; COMPUTER MODELS; GRADIENT INFORMATIONS; KRIGING MODEL; KRIGING SURROGATE MODEL; PREDICTION ACCURACY;

INTERPOLATION;

EID: 84940490308     PISSN: 08917736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WSC.2014.7020113     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Chung, H.-S., and J. J. Alonso. 2002. Using Gradients to Construct Cokriging Approximation Models for High-Dimensional Design Optimization Problems. In Problems, 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA, 2002-0317
2. Reno, NV. Degroote, J., M. Hojjat, E. Stavropoulou, R. Wüchner, and K.-U. Bletzinger. 2013. Partitioned solution of an unsteady adjoint for strongly coupled fluid-structure interactions and application to parameter identification of a one-dimensional problem. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 47 (1): 77-94
3. Hinze, M., and S. Volkwein. 2005. Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Surrogate Models for Nonlinear Dynamical Systems: Error Estimates and Suboptimal Control. In Dimension Reduction of Large-Scale Systems, Volume 45 of Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, 261-306. Springer Berlin Heidelberg
4. Ito, K., and S. Ravindran. 1998. A reduced-order method for simulation and control of fluid flows. Journal of Computational Physics 143 (2): 403-425
5. Liu,W. 2003. Development of Gradient-Enhanced Kriging approximations for multidisciplinary design optimisation. Ph. D. Thesis, Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana. http://etd.nd.edu/ETD-db/theses/available/etd-07012003-215221/[Accessed July 15,2014]
6. Meckesheimer, M., A. J. Booker, R. R. Barton, and T. W. Simpson. 2002. Computationally Inexpensive Metamodel Assessment Strategies. AIAA 40 (10): 2053-2060
7. Morris, M. D., T. J. Mitchell, and D. Ylvisaker. 1993. Bayesian Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments: Use of Gradients in Surface Prediction. Technometrics 35 (3): 243-255
8. Rasmussen, C. E., and C. K. I. Williams. 2006. Gaussian processes for machine learning. Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT Press
9. Sacks, J., W. J. Welch, T. J. Mitchell, and H. P. Wynn. 1989. Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments. Statistical Science 4 (4): 409-423
10. Yamazaki, W., M. P. Rumpfkeil, and D. J. Mavriplis. 2010. Design optimization utilizing Gradient/Hessian enhanced surrogate model. In 28th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Chicago, Illinois, USA
11. Zimmermann, R. 2013. Gradient-enhanced surrogate modeling based on proper orthogonal decomposition. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 237 (1): 403-418