Adequate surgical treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following hip arthroplasty does not correlate with functional outcome and quality of life

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 39, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 1701-1708

  Märdian, Sven ^a   Schaser, Klaus Dieter ^a   Gruner, Johanna ^a   Scheel, Franziska ^a   Perka, Carsten ^a   Schwabe, Philipp ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Femoral fracture; Periprosthetic fracture; Postoperative function; Quality of life; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHARLSON COMORBIDITY INDEX; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR FRACTURE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PATHOLOGIC FRACTURE; PATIENT MOBILITY; PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURE; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDARTHROSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUALITY OF LIFE ASSESSMENT; RANGE OF MOTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SHORT FORM 36; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTER UNIVERSITIES OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; CONVALESCENCE; FEMORAL FRACTURES; HEALTH SURVEY; HIP REPLACEMENT; MIDDLE AGED; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FEMORAL FRACTURES; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84940462163     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: 14325195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-2673-2     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Sadoghi P, Liebensteiner M, Agreiter M, Leithner A, Bohler N, Labek G (2013) Revision surgery after total joint arthroplasty: a complication-based analysis using worldwide arthroplasty registers. J Arthroplasty 28(8):1329–1332. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.012
2. Young SW, Pandit S, Munro JT, Pitto RP (2007) Periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty. ANZ J Surg 77(6):424–428. doi:10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04087.x
3. Della Rocca GJ, Leung KS, Pape HC (2011) Periprosthetic fractures: epidemiology and future projections. J Orthop Trauma 25(Suppl 2):S66–S70. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e31821b8c28
4. Moreta J, Aguirre U, de Ugarte OS, Jauregui I, Mozos JL (2014) Functional and radiological outcome of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty. Injury. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2014.07.013
5. Singh JA, Jensen MR, Harmsen SW, Lewallen DG (2013) Are gender, comorbidity, and obesity risk factors for postoperative periprosthetic fractures after primary total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 28(1):126–131. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2012.03.010, e121-122
6. Duncan CP, Haddad FS (2014) The Unified Classification System (UCS): improving our understanding of periprosthetic fractures. Bone Joint J 96-b(6):713–716
7. Duncan CP, Masri BA (1995) Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect 44:293–304
8. Parvizi J, Rapuri VR, Purtill JJ, Sharkey PF, Rothman RH, Hozack WJ (2004) Treatment protocol for proximal femoral periprosthetic fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(Suppl 2):8–16
9. Parvizi J, Vegari DN (2011) Periprosthetic proximal femur fractures: current concepts. J Orthop Trauma 25(Suppl 2):S77–S81. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e31821b8c3b
10. Zuurmond RG, van Wijhe W, van Raay JJ, Bulstra SK (2010) High incidence of complications and poor clinical outcome in the operative treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures: an analysis of 71 cases. Injury 41(6):629–633. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2010.01.102
11. Saklad M (1941) Grading of patients for surgical procedures. Anesthesiology 2:281–284
12. Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J (1994) Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol 47(11):1245–1251
13. Tarlov AR, Ware JE Jr, Greenfield S, Nelson EC, Perrin E, Zubkoff M (1989) The Medical Outcomes Study. An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. JAMA 262(7):925–930
14. Stucki G, Meier D, Stucki S, Michel BA, Tyndall AG, Dick W, Theiler R (1996) Evaluation of a German version of WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) arthrosis index. Z Rheumatol 55(1):40–49
15. Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51(4):737–755
16. Marchetti P, Binazzi R, Vaccari V, Girolami M, Morici F, Impallomeni C, Commessatti M, Silvello L (2005) Long-term results with cementless Fitek (or Fitmore) cups. J Arthroplasty 20(6):730–737. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2004.11.019
17. Lindahl H, Garellick G, Regner H, Herberts P, Malchau H (2006) Three hundred and twenty-one periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(6):1215–1222. doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00457
18. Lindahl H, Malchau H, Herberts P, Garellick G (2005) Periprosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register. J Arthroplasty 20(7):857–865. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2005.02.001
19. Zampelis V, Ornstein E, Franzen H, Atroshi I (2014) A simple visual analog scale for pain is as responsive as the WOMAC, the SF-36, and the EQ-5D in measuring outcomes of revision hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 85(2):128–132. doi:10.3109/17453674.2014.887951
20. Kurth BM, Ellert U (2002) The SF-36 questionnaire and its usefulness in population studies: results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey 1998. Soz Praventivmed 47(4):266–277
21. Mariconda M, Galasso O, Costa GG, Recano P, Cerbasi S (2011) Quality of life and functionality after total hip arthroplasty: a long-term follow-up study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:222. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-12-222
22. Bravo LE, Garcia LS, Collazos PA (2014) Cancer survival in Cali, Colombia: a population-based study, 1995–2004. Colomb Med (Cali, Colomb) 45(3):110–116
23. Beaulieu ML, Lamontagne M, Beaule PE (2010) Lower limb biomechanics during gait do not return to normal following total hip arthroplasty. Gait Posture 32(2):269–273. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.05.007
24. Beals RK, Tower SS (1996) Periprosthetic fractures of the femur. An analysis of 93 fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 327:238–246
25. Holder N, Papp S, Gofton W, Beaule PE (2014) Outcomes following surgical treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures: a single centre series. Can J Surg 57(3):209–213