Revision surgery after total joint arthroplasty: A complication-based analysis using worldwide arthroplasty registers

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 28, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1329-1332

  Sadoghi, Patrick ^a   Liebensteiner, Michael ^b   Agreiter, Mark ^b   Leithner, Andreas ^a   Böhler, Nikolaus ^c   Labek, Gerold ^b  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

^b INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^c KEPLER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Austria)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Complication; Register data

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; COMPLICATION BASED ANALYSIS; DISLOCATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PAIN; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REGISTER; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TOTAL JOINT ARTHROPLASTY; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ARTHROPLASTY; COMPLICATION; REGISTER DATA;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, ANKLE; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DISLOCATIONS; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; INTERNATIONALITY; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REGISTRIES; REOPERATION;

EID: 84883216159     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.012     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Labek G., Janda W., Agreiter M., et al. Organisation, data evaluation, interpretation and effect of arthroplasty register data on the outcome in terms of revision rate in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2011, 35(2):157. [Epub 2010 Oct 5].
2. Migliore A., Perrini M.R., Romanini E., et al. Comparison of the performance of hip implants with data from different arthroplasty registers. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91B:1545.
3. Herberts P., Malchau H. Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement - a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 2000, 71:111.
4. Kolling C., Simmen B.R., Labek G., et al. Key factors for a successful national arthroplasty register. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89B:1567.
5. Schuh R., Neumann D., Rauf R., et al. Revision rate of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: comparison of published literature and arthroplasty register data. Int Orthop 2012, 36(7):1349.
6. Labek G., Neumann D., Agreiter M., et al. Impact of implant developers on published outcome and reproducibility of cohort-based clinical studies in arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011, 21(93 Suppl 3):55.
7. Schuh R., Dorninger G., Agreiter M., et al. Validity of published outcome data concerning Anatomic Graduated Component total knee arthroplasty: a structured literature review including arthroplasty register data. Int Orthop 2012, 36(1):51.
8. No authors listed. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki - ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. (date last accessed 30 May 2012). http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/17c.pdf.
9. Furnes O., Lie S.A., Espehaug B., et al. Hip disease and the prognosis of total hip replacements - a review of 53 698 primary total hip replacements reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1987-99. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001, 83B:579.
10. No authors listed. European Arthroplasty Register. (date last accessed 30 May 2012). http://www.ear.efort.org/registers.aspx.
11. Labek G., Thaler M., Janda W., et al. Revision rates after total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011, 93-B:293.
12. Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009, 339:b2535.
13. Robertsson O. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register - validity and outcome. PhD Thesis. Lund University Hospital. Wallin & Dalholm AB, Lund, Sweden. 2000.
14. Labek G., Sekyra K., Pawelka W., et al. Outcome and reproducibility of data concerning the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a structures literature review including arthroplasty registry data. Acta Orthop 2011, 82(2):131.
15. Havelin LI. Hip arthroplasty in Norway 1087-1994 - the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. PhD-Thesis. University of Bergen, Norway. 1995. ISBN 82-90977-17-4.
16. Robertsson O., Dunbar M.J., Knutson K., et al. Validation of the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. A postal survey regarding 30,376 knees operated on between 1975 and 1995. Acta Orthop Scand 1999, 70(5):467.
17. Robertsson O., Dunbar M.J., Pehrsson T., et al. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty. A report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 2000, 71(3):262.
18. Robertsson O., Borquist L., Knutson K., et al. Use of unicompartmental instead of tricompartmental prostheses for unicompartmental arthrosis in the knee is a cost-effective alternative. Acta Orthop Scand 1999, 70(2):170.
19. Robertsson O., Bizjajeva S., Fenstad A.M., et al. Knee arthroplasty in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Acta Orthop 2010, 81(1):82.
20. Robertsson O., Stefánsdóttir A., Lidgren L., et al. Increased long-term mortality in patients less than 55years old who have undergone knee replacement for osteoarthritis: results from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89(5):599.
21. Henricson A., Nilsson J.A., Carlsson A. 10-year survival of total ankle arthroplasties: a report on 780 cases from the Swedish Ankle Register. Acta Orthop 2011, 82(6):655.
22. Skyttä E.T., Koivu H., Eskelin A., et al. Total ankle replacement: a population-based study of 515 cases from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2010, 81(1):114.
23. Henricson A., Skoog A., Carlsson A. The Swedish Ankle Arthroplasty Register: an analysis of 531 arthroplasties between 1993 and 2005. Acta Orthop 2007, 78(5):569.
24. Krause F.G., Windolf M., Bora B., et al. Impact of complications in total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis analyzed with a validated outcome measurement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001, 93(9):830.
25. Söderman P., Malchau H., Herberts P., et al. Are the findings in the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register valid? A comparison between the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register, the National Discharge Register, and the National Death Register. J Arthroplasty 2000, 15(7):884.
26. Migliore A., Perrini M.R., Romanini E., et al. Comparison of the performance of hip implants with data from different arthroplasty registers. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91:1545.