Longitudinal evolution of incidentally detected solitary pure ground-glass nodules on ct: Relation to clinical metrics

Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 385-390

  Silva, Mario ^a,b   Bankier, Alexander A ^b   Centra, Francesco ^a   Colombi, Davide ^a   Ampollini, Luca ^a   Carbognani, Paolo ^a   Sverzellati, Nicola ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF PARMA   (Italy)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LUNG ADENOCARCINOMA; LUNG NODULE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PURE GROUND GLASS NODULE; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY; TUMOR GROWTH; AGE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DISEASE COURSE; INCIDENTAL FINDING; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOLITARY PULMONARY NODULE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84940381739     PISSN: 13053825     EISSN: 13053612     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5152/dir.2015.14457     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Godoy MC, Naidich DP. Overview and strategic management of subsolid pulmonary nodules. J Thorac Imaging 2012; 27:240-248. [CrossRef]
2. Austin JH, Garg K, Aberle D, et al. Radiologic implications of the 2011 classification of adenocarcinoma of the lung. Radiology 2013; 266:62-71. [CrossRef]
3. Naidich DP, Bankier AA, Macmahon H, et al. Recommendations for the management of subsolid pulmonary nodules detected at CT: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 2013; 266:304-317. [CrossRef]
4. Kim H, Park CM, Koh JM, Lee SM, Goo JM. Pulmonary subsolid nodules: what radiologists need to know about the imaging features and management strategy. Diagn Interv Radiol 2014; 20:47-57.
5. Galvin JR, Franks TJ. Lung cancer diagnosis: radiologic imaging, histology, and genetics. Radiology 2013; 268:9-11. [CrossRef]
6. MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G, et al. Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 2005; 237:395-400. [CrossRef]
7. McWilliams A, Tammemagi MC, Mayo JR, et al. Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT. N Engl J Med 2013; 369:910-919. [CrossRef]
8. Smidt N, Rutjes AW, van der Windt DA, et al. Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. Radiology 2005; 235:347-353. [CrossRef]
9. Revel MP, Bissery A, Bienvenu M, Aycard L, Lefort C, Frija G. Are two-dimensional CT measurements of small noncalcified pulmonary nodules reliable? Radiology 2004; 231:453-458. [CrossRef]
10. Tamura M, Shimizu Y, Yamamoto T, Yoshikawa J, Hashizume Y. Predictive value of one-dimensional mean computed tomography value of ground-glass opacity on high-resolution images for the possibility of future change. J Thorac Oncol 2014; 9:469-472. [CrossRef]
11. CT screening for lung cancer: diagnoses resulting from the New York Early Lung Cancer Action Project. Radiology 2007; 243:239-249. [CrossRef]
12. Felix L, Serra-Tosio G, Lantuejoul S, et al. CT characteristics of resolving ground-glass opacities in a lung cancer screening programme. Eur J Radiol 2011; 77:410-416. [CrossRef]
13. Choi WS, Park CM, Song YS, Lee SM, Wi JY, Goo JM. Transient subsolid nodules in patients with extrapulmonary malignancies: their frequency and differential features. Acta Radiol 2015; 56:428-437. [CrossRef]
14. Lee HJ, Kim YT, Kang CH, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in lung adenocarcinomas: relationship with CT characteristics and histologic subtypes. Radiology 2013; 268:254-264. [CrossRef]
15. Matsuguma H, Mori K, Nakahara R, et al. Characteristics of subsolid pulmonary nodules showing growth during follow-up with CT scanning. Chest 2013; 143:436-443. [CrossRef]
16. Takahashi S, Tanaka N, Okimoto T, et al. Longterm follow-up for small pure ground-glass nodules: implications of determining an optimum follow-up period and high-resolution CT findings to predict the growth of nodules. Jpn J Radiol 2012; 30:206-217. [CrossRef]
17. Chang B, Hwang JH, Choi YH, et al. Natural history of pure ground-glass opacity lung nodules detected by low-dose CT scan. Chest 2013; 143:172-178. [CrossRef]
18. Song YS, Park CM, Park SJ, Lee SM, Jeon YK, Goo JM. Volume and mass doubling times of persistent pulmonary subsolid nodules detected in patients without known malignancy. Radiology 2014; 273:276-284. [CrossRef]
19. Park CM, Goo JM, Kim TJ, et al. Pulmonary nodular ground-glass opacities in patients with extrapulmonary cancers: what is their clinical significance and how can we determine whether they are malignant or benign lesions? Chest 2008; 133:1402-1409. [CrossRef]
20. Hiramatsu M, Inagaki T, Matsui Y, et al. Pulmonary ground-glass opacity (GGO) lesions-large size and a history of lung cancer are risk factors for growth. J Thorac Oncol 2008; 3:1245-1250. [CrossRef]
21. Attina D, Niro F, Stellino M, et al. Evolution of the subsolid pulmonary nodule: a retrospective study in patients with different neoplastic diseases in a nonscreening clinical context. Ra- diol Med 2013; 118:1269-1280. [CrossRef]
22. Kim H, Park CM, Woo S, et al. Pure and part-solid pulmonary ground-glass nodules: measurement variability of volume and mass in nodules with a solid portion less than or equal to 5 mm. Radiology 2013; 269:585-593. [CrossRef]
23. Scholten ET, de Jong PA, Jacobs C, et al. Interscan variation of semi-automated volumetry of subsolid pulmonary nodules. Eur Radiol 2014; 25:1040-1047. [CrossRef]
24. Scholten ET, de Jong PA, de Hoop B, et al. Towards a close computed tomography monitoring approach for screen detected subsolid pulmonary nodules? Eur Respir J 2015; 45:765-773. [CrossRef]
25. Xu DM, Lee IJ, Zhao S, et al. CT Screening for lung cancer: value of expert review of initial baseline screenings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 28:1-6.