Experiencing thinking

The Experience of Thinking: How the Fluency of Mental Processes Influences Cognition and Behavior

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1-8

  Greifeneder, Rainer ^a   Unkelbach, Christian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84940269058     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203078938     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 219-235.
2. Clore, G. L. (1992). Cognitive phenomenology: Feelings and the construction of judgment. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgments (pp. 133- 163). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
3. Dehaene, S., Changeux, J., Naccache, L., Sackur, J., & Sergent, C. (2006). Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: A testable taxonomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 204-211.
4. Fox, C. R. (2006). The availability heuristic in the classroom: How soliciting more criticism can boost your course ratings. Judgment and Decision Making, 1, 86-90.
5. Greifeneder, R., Alt, A., Bottenberg, K., Seele, T., Zelt, S., & Wagener, D. (2010). On writing legibly: Processing fluency systematically biases evaluations of handwritten material. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 230-237.
6. James, H. W. (1929). The effect of handwriting upon grading. The English Journal, 16, 180-185.
7. Kleider, H. M., & Goldinger, S. D. (2004). Illusions of face memory: Clarity breeds familiarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 196-211.
8. Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100, 609-639.
9. Koriat, A. & Levy-Sadot, R. (1999). Processes underlying metacognitive judgments: Information-based and experience-based monitoring of one's own knowledge. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology. (pp. 483- 502). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10. Lev-Ari, S., & Keysar, B. (2010). Why don't we believe non-native speakers? The influence of accent on credibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1093-1096. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.025
11. Mussweiler, T. (2003). Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review, 110, 472-489.
12. Nelson, T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51 (2), 102 116.
13. Parducci, A. (1968). The relativism of absolute judgments. Scientifi c American, 219, 84-89.
14. Schwartz, B. L. (2002). Tip-of-the-tongue states: Phenomenology, mechanism, and lexical retrieval. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Topolinski, S., & Reber, R. (2010). Immediate truth-Temporal contiguity between a cognitive problem and its solution determines experienced veracity of the solution. Cognition, 114, 117-122
16. Unkelbach, C. (2007). Reversing the truth effect: Learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 33, 219-230.
17. Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2000). The source of feelings of familiarity: The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26, 547-565.
18. Wundt, W. (1862). Beiträge zur Theorie der Sinneswahrnehmung. Leipzig: C.F. Winter'sche Verlagshandlung.