NRGsuite: A PyMOL plugin to perform docking simulations in real time using FlexAID

Bioinformatics

Volumn 31, Issue 23, 2015, Pages 3856-3858

  Gaudreault, Francis ^a   Morency, Louis Philippe ^a   Najmanovich, Rafael J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIGAND; PROTEIN;

BINDING SITE; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR DOCKING; PROCEDURES; SOFTWARE;

BINDING SITES; LIGANDS; MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84940192696     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv458     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Combs, S.A. et al. (2013) Small-molecule ligand docking into comparative models with Rosetta. Nat. Protoc., 8, 1277-1298.
2. DeLano, W. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. Schrödinger, LLC. (www.pymol.org).
3. Duchêne, D. et al. (2014) Analysis of subpocket selectivity and identification of potent selective inhibitors for matriptase and matriptase-2. J. Med. Chem., 57, 10198-10204.
4. Gaudreault, F. and Najmanovich, R.J. (2015) FlexAID: revisiting docking on non-native-complex structures. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 55, 1323-1336.
5. Glaser, F. et al. (2006) A method for localizing ligand binding pockets in protein structures. Proteins, 62, 479-488.
6. Grosdidier, A. et al. (2011) SwissDock, a protein-small molecule docking web service based on EADock DSS. Nucleic Acids Res., 39, W270-W277.
7. Huang, S.-Y. et al. (2010) Scoring functions and their evaluation methods for protein-ligand docking: recent advances and future directions. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 12, 12899-12908.
8. Irwin, J.J. et al. (2009) Automated docking screens: a feasibility study. J. Med. Chem., 52, 5712-5720.
9. Kahraman, A. et al. (2007) Shape variation in protein binding pockets and their ligands. J. Mol. Biol., 368, 283-301.
10. Kramer, B. et al. (1999) Ligand docking and screening with FlexX. Med. Chem. Res., 9, 463-478.
11. Laskowski, R. (1995) Surfnet-a program for visualizing molecular-surfaces, cavities, and intermolecular interactions. J. Mol. Graph., 13, 323-330.
12. Laskowski, R.A. et al. (1996) Protein clefts in molecular recognition and function. Protein Sci., 5, 2438-2452.
13. Li, H. et al. (2014) istar: a web platform for large-scale protein-ligand docking. PLoS ONE, 9, e85678.
14. Lill, M.A. and Danielson, M.L. (2011) Computer-aided drug design platform using PyMOL. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 25, 13-19.
15. Oliveira, S.H. et al. (2014) KVFinder: steered identification of protein cavities as a PyMOL plugin. BMC Bioinformatics, 15, 197.
16. Ruiz-Carmona, S. et al. (2014) rDock: a fast, versatile and open source program for docking ligands to proteins and nucleic acids. PLoS Comput. Biol., 10, e1003571.
17. Seeliger, D. and de Groot, B.L. (2010) Ligand docking and binding site analysis with PyMOL and Autodock/Vina. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 24, 417-422.
18. Trott, O. and Olson, A.J. (2010) AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem., 31, 455-461.
19. Zavodszky, M. et al. (2002) Distilling the essential features of a protein surface for improving protein-ligand docking, scoring, and virtual screening. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 16, 883-902.