The ongoing search for the molecular basis of plant osmosensing

Journal of General Physiology

Volumn 145, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 389-394

  Haswell, Elizabeth S ^a   Verslues, Paul E ^b  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INSTITUTE OF PLANT AND MICROBIAL BIOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METABOLISM; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT CELL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PLANT CELLS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 84940189857     PISSN: 00221295     EISSN: 15407748     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1085/jgp.201411295     Document Type: Note

References (31)

1. Beattie, G.A. 2011. Water relations in the interaction of foliar bacterial pathogens with plants. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 49:533-555. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-073009-114436
2. Boudsocq, M., M.J. Droillard, H. Barbier-Brygoo, and C. Laurière. 2007. Different phosphorylation mechanisms are involved in the activation of sucrose non-fermenting 1 related protein kinases 2 by osmotic stresses and abscisic acid. Plant Mol. Biol. 63:491-503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11103-006-9103-1
3. Boyer, J.S., and P.J. Kramer. 1995. Measuring the Water Status of Plants and Soils. Academic Press, San Diego. 178 pp.
4. Canut, H., A. Carrasco, J.P. Galaud, C. Cassan, H. Bouyssou, N. Vita, P. Ferrara, and R. Pont-Lezica. 1998. High affinity RGD-binding sites at the plasma membrane of Arabidopsis thaliana links the cell wall. Plant J. 16:63-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00276.x
5. Cazale, A.C., M.J. Droillard, C. Wilson, E. Heberle-Bors, H. Barbier-Brygoo, and C. Lauriere. 1999. MAP kinase activation by hypoosmotic stress of tobacco cell suspensions: towards the oxidative burst response? Plant J. 19:297-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00528.x
6. Cheung, A.Y., and H.M. Wu. 2011. THESEUS 1, FERONIA and relatives:a family of cell wall-sensing receptor kinases? Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 14:632-641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2011.09.001
7. Christmann, A., E. Grill, and J. Huang. 2013. Hydraulic signals in long-distance signaling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 16:293-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2013.02.011
8. Cutler, S.R., P.L. Rodriguez, R.R. Finkelstein, and S.R. Abrams. 2010. Abscisic acid: Emergence of a core signaling network. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 61:651-679. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112122
9. Hamann, T. 2012. Plant cell wall integrity maintenance as an essential component of biotic stress response mechanisms. Front. Plant Sci. 3:77. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2012.00077
10. Hedrich, R. 2012. Ion channels in plants. Physiol. Rev. 92:1777-1811. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00038.2011
11. Hou, C., W. Tian, T. Kleist, K. He, V. Garcia, F. Bai, Y. Hao, S. Luan, and L. Li. 2014. DUF221 proteins are a family of osmosensitive calcium-permeable cation channels conserved across eukaryotes. Cell Res. 24:632-635. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cr.2014.14
12. Knepper, C., E.A. Savory, and B. Day. 2011. Arabidopsis NDR1 is an integrin-like protein with a role in fluid loss and plasma membrane-cell wall adhesion. Plant Physiol. 156:286-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.169656
13. Kohorn, B.D., and S.L. Kohorn. 2012. The cell wall-associated kinases, WAKs, as pectin receptors. Front. Plant Sci. 3:88. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2012.00088
14. Kumar, M.N., W.N. Jane, and P.E. Verslues. 2013. Role of the putative osmosensor Arabidopsis histidine kinase1 in dehydration avoidance and low-water-potential response. Plant Physiol. 161:942-953. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.209791
15. 2+ transport. Trends Plant Sci. 18:227-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.12.002
16. Long, S.P., and D.R. Ort. 2010. More than taking the heat: crops and global change. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 13:240-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2010.04.008
17. Maathuis, F.J. 2011. Vacuolar two-pore K+ channels act as vacuolar osmosensors. New Phytol. 191:84-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03664.x
18. Marshall, A., R.B. Aalen, D. Audenaert, T. Beeckman, M.R. Broadley, M.A. Butenko, A.I. Caño-Delgado, S. de Vries, T. Dresselhaus, G. Felix, et al. 2012. Tackling drought stress: Receptor-like kinases present new approaches. Plant Cell. 24:2262-2278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.112.096677
19. Monshausen, G.B., and E.S. Haswell. 2013. A force of nature: molecular mechanisms of mechanoperception in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 64:4663-4680. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert204
20. Parsegian, V.A., R.P. Rand, and D.C. Rau. 1995. Macromolecules and water: Probing with osmotic stress. Methods Enzymol. 259:43-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(95)59039-0
21. Pritchard, J. 2001. Turgor pressure. In Encyclopedia of the Life Sciences. John Wiley&Sons, Ltd., Hoboken, NJ. 1-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npg.els.0001687
22. Romeis, T., A.A. Ludwig, R. Martin, and J.D. Jones. 2001. Calciumdependent protein kinases play an essential role in a plant defence response. EMBO J. 20:5556-5567. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/20.20.5556
23. Saito, H., and F. Posas. 2012. Response to hyperosmotic stress. Genetics. 192:289-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.112.140863
24. Tran, L.S., T. Urao, F. Qin, K. Maruyama, T. Kakimoto, K. Shinozaki, and K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki. 2007. Functional analysis of AHK1/ATHK1 and cytokinin receptor histidine kinases in response to abscisic acid, drought, and salt stress in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 104:20623-20628. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706547105
25. Verslues, P.E., and T.E. Juenger. 2011. Drought, metabolites, and Arabidopsis natural variation: a promising combination for understanding adaptation to water-limited environments. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 14:240-245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2011.04.006
26. Verslues, P.E., M. Agarwal, S. Katiyar-Agarwal, J. Zhu, and J.K. Zhu. 2006. Methods and concepts in quantifying resistance to drought, salt and freezing, abiotic stresses that affect plant water status. Plant J. 45:523-539. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02593.x
27. Verslues, P.E., J.R. Lasky, T.E. Juenger, T.W. Liu, and M.N. Kumar. 2014. Genome-wide association mapping combined with reverse genetics identifies new effectors of low water potential-induced proline accumulation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 164:144-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.224014
28. Wilson, M.E., M.R. Basu, G.B. Bhaskara, P.E. Verslues, and E.S. Haswell. 2014. Plastid osmotic stress activates cellular stress responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 165:119-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.236620
29. Wohlbach, D.J., B.F. Quirino, and M.R. Sussman. 2008. Analysis of the Arabidopsis histidine kinase ATHK1 reveals a connection between vegetative osmotic stress sensing and seed maturation. Plant Cell. 20:1101-1117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.107.055871
30. Yoshida, T., J. Mogami, and K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki. 2014. ABAdependent and ABA-independent signaling in response to osmotic stress in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 21:133-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2014.07.009
31. Yuan, F., H. Yang, Y. Xue, D. Kong, R. Ye, C. Li, J. Zhang, L. Theprungsirikul, T. Shrift, B. Krichilsky, et al. 2014. OSCA1 mediates osmotic-stress-evoked Ca increases vital for osmosensing in Arabidopsis. Nature. 514:367-371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13593