Trial registration 10 years on

BMJ (Online)

Volumn 351, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Weber, Wim E J ^a   Merino, José G ^a   Loder, Elizabeth ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); EDITORIAL; FUNDING; HUMAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE; PUBLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REGISTRATION; RESEARCH ETHICS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; EUROPEAN UNION; PUBLISHING; UNITED STATES;

EDITORIAL POLICIES; EUROPEAN UNION; HUMANS; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLICATION BIAS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84940121954     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h3572     Document Type: Editorial

References (13)

1. De Angelis CD, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, et al. Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. JAMA 2004;292:1363-4.
2. Simes RJ. Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 1986;4:1529-41.
3. ClinicalTrials.gov. Trends, charts, and maps. May 2015. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/resources/trends.
4. Mathieu S, Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Ravaud P. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2009;302:977-84.
5. To MJ, Jones J, Emara M, Jadad AR. Are reports of randomized controlled trials improving over time? A systematic review of 284 articles published in high-impact general and specialized medical journals. PLoS One 2013;8:e84779.
6. Killeen S, Sourallous P, Hunter IA, Hartley JE, Grady HL. Registration rates, adequacy of registration, and a comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials published in surgery journals. Ann Surg 2014;259:193-6.
7. Su CX, Han M, Ren J, et al. Empirical evidence for outcome reporting bias in randomized clinical trials of acupuncture: comparison of registered records and subsequent publications. Trials 2015;16:28.
8. Dwan K, Gamble C, Williamson PR, Kirkham JJ. Systematic review of the empirical evidenceof study publication bias and outcome reporting bias-an updated review. PLoS One 2013;8:e66844.
9. Van Lent M, Int Hout J, Out HJ. Differences between information in registries and articles did not influence publication acceptance. J Clin Epidemiol 29 Nov. 2014, doi:10.1016/j. jclinepi.2014.11.019.
10. Hooft L, Korevaar DA, Molenaar N, Bossuyt PM, Scholten RJ. Endorsement of ICMJE's clinical trial registration policy: a survey among journal editors. Neth J Med 2014;72:349-55.
11. Wager E, Williams P, Project Overcome Failure to Publish Negative Findings Consortium. "Hardly worth the effort"? Medical journals' policies and their editors' and publishers' views on trial registration and publication bias: quantitative and qualitative study. BMJ 2013;347:f5248.
12. Zarin DA, Tse T. Trust but verify: trial registration and determining fidelity to the protocol. Ann Intern Med 2013;159:65-7.
13. National Institutes of Health. NIH request for public comments on the draft NIH policy on dissemination of NIH-funded clinical trial information. Nov. 2014. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-15-019.html.