Application of immobilized and granular dried anaerobic biomass for stabilizing and increasing anaerobic bio-systems tolerance for high organic loads and phenol shocks

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 197, Issue , 2015, Pages 106-112

  Massalha, Nedal ^a,b   Brenner, Asher ^a   Sheindorf, Chaim ^c   Sabbah, Isam ^b,d  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^b Galilee Society Institute of Applied Research   (Israel)

^c Shenkar College for Design   (Israel)

^d ORT BRAUDE COLLEGE   (Israel)

Author keywords

Activated carbon; Anaerobic treatment; Immobilized biomass; Phenol; Polyurethane foam

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED CARBON; CARBON; FOAMS; PHENOLS; POLYURETHANES; RIGID FOAMED PLASTICS;

ANAEROBIC BIOMASS; ANAEROBIC METHANOGENS; ANAEROBIC TREATMENTS; CONTINUOUS FLOWS; IMMOBILIZED BIOMASS; ORGANIC LOADING RATES; POLYURETHANE FOAM; SYNTHETIC MIXTURES;

BIOMASS;

ACTIVATED CARBON; GLUCOSE; METHANE; ORGANIC CARBON; PHENOL; POLYURETHAN FOAM; POLYURETHAN;

ACTIVATED CARBON; ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIOMASS; BIOREACTOR; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FOAM; GRANULAR MEDIUM; IMMOBILIZATION; METHANOGENIC BACTERIUM; PHENOL; STABILIZATION;

ANAEROBIC BACTERIUM; ANAEROBIC REACTOR; ARTICLE; BIODEGRADATION; BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY; CONTINUOUS FLOW REACTOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFUSION; FIXED BED REACTOR; HYDROPHILICITY; IMMOBILIZED BIOMASS; MOLECULAR STABILITY; NONHUMAN; ORGANIC WASTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEADY STATE; UPFLOW REACTOR; WASTE MANAGEMENT; ANAEROBIC GROWTH; BIOMASS; BIOREACTOR; DRUG EFFECTS; EURYARCHAEOTA; IMMOBILIZED CELL; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY;

ANAEROBIOSIS; BIOMASS; BIOREACTORS; CELLS, IMMOBILIZED; EURYARCHAEOTA; PHENOL; POLYURETHANES;

EID: 84940046822     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.060     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. APHA, AWWA, WEF, 1999. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 20th ed., Public Health.
2. Bae J., Shin C., Lee E., Kim J., McCarty P.L. Anaerobic treatment of low-strength wastewater: a comparison between single and staged anaerobic fluidized bed membrane bioreactors. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 165:75-80.
3. Bajaj M., Gallert C., Winter J. Treatment of phenolic wastewater in an anaerobic fixed bed reactor (AFBR) - recovery after shock loading. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 162:1330-1339.
4. Barrera E.L., Spanjers H., Solon K., Amerlinck Y., Nopens I., Dewulf J. Modeling the anaerobic digestion of cane-molasses vinasse: extension of the Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 (ADM1) with sulfate reduction for a very high strength and sulfate rich wastewater. Water Res. 2014, 71:42-54.
5. Cabrol L., Malhautier L. Integrating microbial ecology in bioprocess understanding: the case of gas biofiltration. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 90:837-849.
6. Chen Y., Cheng J.J., Creamer K.S. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:4044-4064.
7. Dereli R.K., Ersahin M.E., Ozgun H., Ozturk I., Jeison D., van der Zee F., van Lier J.B. Potentials of anaerobic membrane bioreactors to overcome treatment limitations induced by industrial wastewaters. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 122:160-170.
8. Di Berardino S., Costa S., Converti A. Semi-continuous anaerobic digestion of a food industry wastewater in an anaerobic filter. Bioresour. Technol. 2000, 71:261-266.
9. Dupla M., Conte T., Bouvier J.C., Bernet N., Steyer J.P. Dynamic evaluation of a fixed bed anaerobic digestion process in response to organic overloads and toxicant shock loads. Water Sci. Technol. 2004, 49:61-68.
10. Dwyer D.F., Krumme M.L., Boyd S.a., Tiedje J.M. Kinetics of phenol biodegradation by an immobilized methanogenic consortium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1986, 52:345-351.
11. Fazolo A., Foresti E., Zaiat M. Removal of nitrogen and organic matter in a radial-flow aerobic-anoxic immobilized biomass reactor used in the posttreatment of anaerobically treated effluent. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2007, 142:44-51.
12. Gao D., An R., Tao Y., Li J., Li X., Ren N. Simultaneous methane production and wastewater reuse by a membrane-based process: evaluation with raw domestic wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 186:383-389.
13. Heipieper H.J., Keweloh H., Rehm H.J. Influence of phenols on growth and membrane-permeability of free and immobilized Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1991, 57:1213-1217.
14. Jang H.M., Kim J.H., Ha J.H., Park J.M. Bacterial and methanogenic archaeal communities during the single-stage anaerobic digestion of high-strength food wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 165:174-182.
15. Lawrence A.W., McCarty P.L. Kinetics of methane fermentation in anaerobic treatment. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 1969, 41:R1-R17.
16. Lettinga G. Sustainable integrated biological wastewater treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 1996, 33:85-98.
17. Massalha N., Basheer S., Sabbah I. Effect of adsorption and bead size of immobilized biomass on the rate of biodegradation of phenol at high concentration levels. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46:6820-6824.
18. Massalha N., Brenner A., Sheindorf C., Haimov Y., Sabbah I. Enriching composite hydrophilic polyurethane foams with PAC to enhance adsorption of phenol from aqueous solutions. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 280:283-292.
19. Massalha N., Brenner A., Sheindorf C., Sabbah I. The effect of anaerobic biomass drying and exposure to air on their recovery and evolution. Water Res. 2014, 63:42-51.
20. Massalha N., Shaviv A., Sabbah I. Modeling the effect of immobilization of microorganisms on the rate of biodegradation of phenol under inhibitory conditions. Water Res. 2010, 44:5252-5259.
21. McCarty P.L., Bae J., Kim J. Domestic wastewater treatment as a net energy producer-can this be achieved?. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45:7100-7106.
22. Michaud S., Bernet N., Buffière P., Delgenès J.P. Use of the methane yield to indicate the metabolic behaviour of methanogenic biofilms. Process Biochem. 2005, 40:2751-2755.
23. Nguyen L.N., Hai F.I., Price W.E., Leusch F.D.L., Roddick F., Ngo H.H., Guo W., Magram S.F., Nghiem L.D. The effects of mediator and granular activated carbon addition on degradation of trace organic contaminants by an enzymatic membrane reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 167:169-177.
24. Pérez M., Romero L.I., Nebot E., Sales D. Colonisation of a porous sintered-glass support in anaerobic thermophilic bioreactors. Bioresour. Technol. 1997, 59:177-183.
25. Rebhun M., Galil N. Inhibition by hazardous compounds in an integrated oil refinery. J. WPCF 1988, 60(11):1953-1959. 1983 60.
26. Rosenkranz F., Cabrol L., Carballa M., Donoso-Bravo A., Cruz L., Ruiz-Filippi G., Chamy R., Lema J.M. Relationship between phenol degradation efficiency and microbial community structure in an anaerobic SBR. Water Res. 2013, 47:6739-6749.
27. Scully C., Collins G., O'Flaherty V. Anaerobic biological treatment of phenol at 9.5-15°C in an expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB)-based bioreactor. Water Res. 2006, 40:3737-3744.
28. Sekiguchi Y., Kamagata Y., Harada H. Recent advances in methane fermentation technology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2001, 12:277-282.
29. Smith A.L., Stadler L.B., Love N.G., Skerlos S.J., Raskin L. Perspectives on anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatment of domestic wastewater: a critical review. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 122:149-159.
30. Tay J.-H., He Y.-X., Yan Y.-G. Improved anaerobic degradation of phenol with supplemental glucose. J. Environ. Eng. 2001, 127:38-45.
31. Van der Zee F.P., Bisschops I.A.E., Lettinga G., Field J.A. Activated carbon as an electron acceptor and redox mediator during the anaerobic biotransformation of Azo Dyes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37:402-408.
32. Walker G. Biological activated carbon treatment of industrial wastewater in stirred tank reactors. Chem. Eng. J. 1999, 75:201-206.
33. Wang W., Han H. Recovery strategies for tackling the impact of phenolic compounds in a UASB reactor treating coal gasification wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 103:95-100.
34. Wu S., Hung C., Lin C., Lin P., Lee K., Chang F., Chang J. HRT-dependent hydrogen production and bacterial community structure of mixed anaerobic microflora in suspended, granular and immobilized sludge systems using glucose as the carbon substrate. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33:1542-1549.