Quantitative gene set analysis generalized for repeated measures, confounder adjustment, and continuous covariates

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Turner, Jacob A ^a   Bolen, Christopher R ^b   Blankenship, Derek M ^a  

^a BAYLOR RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Confounder adjustment; Gene set analysis; Linear mixed models; QuSAGE; Repeated measures

Indexed keywords

BIT ERROR RATE; GENES;

COMPLEX DATA STRUCTURES; CONFOUNDER; LINEAR MIXED MODEL ANALYSIS; LINEAR MIXED MODELS; QUSAGE; REPEATED MEASURES; SOURCES OF VARIABILITY; STATISTICAL MODELING;

GENE EXPRESSION;

AGE; ALGORITHM; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOMICS; HUMAN; INFLUENZA; INFLUENZA A VIRUS (H3N2); LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; METABOLISM; PATHOGENICITY; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL MODEL; VIROLOGY;

AGE FACTORS; ALGORITHMS; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOMICS; HUMANS; INFLUENZA A VIRUS, H3N2 SUBTYPE; INFLUENZA, HUMAN; LINEAR MODELS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 84940029517     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-015-0707-9     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Kerr MK, Churchill GA. Statistical design and the analysis of gene expression microarray data. Genet Res. 2007; 89:509-14. doi: 10.1017/S0016672308009713 .
2. Li H, Wood C, Getchell T, Getchell M, Stromberg A. Analysis of oligonucleotide array experiments with repeated measures using mixed models. BMC Bioinformatics. 2004; 5(1):209. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-5-209 .
3. Ghosh D, Chinnaiyan AM. Covariate adjustment in the analysis of microarray data from clinical studies. Funct Integr Genomics. 2005; 5(1):18-27. doi: 10.1007/s10142-004-0120-3 .
4. Ackermann M, Strimmer K. A general modular framework for gene set enrichment analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009; 10(1):47. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-47 .
5. Goeman JJ, Bühlmann P. Analyzing gene expression data in terms of gene sets: methodological issues. Bioinformatics. 2007; 23(8):980-7. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm051 .
6. Maciejewski H. Gene set analysis methods: statistical models and methodological differences. Brief Bioinform. 2014; 15(4):504-18. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbt002 . http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/content/15/4/504.full.pdf+html .
7. Nam D, Kim SY. Gene-set approach for expression pattern analysis. Brief Bioinform. 2008; 9(3):189-97. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbn001 . http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/content/9/3/189.full.pdf+html .
8. Fridley BL, Jenkins GD, Biernacka JM. Self-contained gene-set analysis of expression data: an evaluation of existing and novel methods. PloS ONE. 2010; 5(9):12693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012693 .
9. Jiang Z, Gentleman R. Extensions to gene set enrichment. Bioinformatics. 2007; 23(3):306-13. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl599 .
10. Kim S-YY, Volsky DJ. Page: parametric analysis of gene set enrichment. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005; 6(1):144. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-144 .
11. Wu D, Smyth GK. Camera: a competitive gene set test accounting for inter-gene correlation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 40(17):133.
12. Zhang K, Wang H, Bathke A, Harrar S, Piepho HP, Deng Y. Gene set analysis for longitudinal gene expression data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011; 12(1):273. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-273 .
13. Barry WT, Nobel AB, Wright FA. Significance analysis of functional categories in gene expression studies: a structured permutation approach. Bioinformatics. 2005; 21(9):1943-9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti260 .
14. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al.Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(43):15545-50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102 . http://www.pnas.org/content/102/43/15545.full.pdf+html .
15. Efron B, Tibshirani R. On testing the significance of sets of genes. Ann Appl Stat. 2007; 1(1):107-29. doi: 10.1214/07-AOAS101 .
16. Yaari G, Bolen CR, Thakar J, Kleinstein SH. Quantitative set analysis for gene expression: a method to quantify gene set differential expression including gene-gene correlations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 41(18):170. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt660 . http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/content/41/18/e170.full.pdf+html .
17. Galwey NW. Estimation of Random Effects in Mixed Models: Best Linear Unbiased Predictors vol. 1, 1st edn. New Jersey: Wiley; 2006, pp. 151-67.
18. Verbeke G, Molenberghs G. Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data, Corrected edn. New York: Springer; 2000.
19. Huang Y, Zaas A, Rao A, Dobigeon N, Woolf P, Veldman T, et al.Temporal dynamics of host molecular responses differentiate symptomatic and asymptomatic influenza a infection. PLos Genet. 2011;7(8). doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002234 .
20. Chaussabel D, Quinn C, Shen J, Patel P, Glaser C, Baldwin N, et al.A modular analysis framework for blood genomics studies: application to systemic lupus erythematosus. 2008; 29(1):150.
21. Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0 edn. 2011. Available from http://www.cochrane-handbook.org . Access date: June 20, 2015.
22. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE, Nizam A. Applied Regression Analysis and Multivariable Methods, 3rd edn. New York: Duxbury Press; 1997.