Model structure and parameter identification of soil organic matter models

Soil Biology and Biochemistry

Volumn 90, Issue , 2015, Pages 197-203

  Sierra, Carlos A ^a   Malghani, Saadatullah ^a   Müller, Markus ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOGEOCHEMISTRY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Identifiability analysis; Parameter estimation; Radiocarbon; Soil carbon; Soil incubations

Indexed keywords

BIOGEOCHEMISTRY; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; ISOTOPES; MODEL STRUCTURES; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; SOILS;

ECOLOGICAL MECHANISMS; ESTIMATION OF PARAMETERS; IDENTIFIABILITY ANALYSIS; PARAMETER IDENTIFIABILITY; RADIOCARBON; SOIL CARBON; SOIL INCUBATION; SOIL RESPIRATION FLUXES;

PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

CARBON ISOTOPE; DATA SET; NUMERICAL MODEL; PARAMETERIZATION; PREDICTION; SOIL CARBON; SOIL ORGANIC MATTER; SOIL RESPIRATION;

EID: 84940025869     PISSN: 00380717     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.08.012     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. 14C measurements of soil organic carbon and heterotrophic respiration as joint constraints. Biogeosciences 2014, 11(8):2147-2168.
2. Beck M.B. Water quality modeling: a review of the analysis of uncertainty. Water Resources Research 1987, 23(8):1393-1442.
3. Beven K. A manifesto for the equifinality thesis. Journal of Hydrology 2006, 320:18-36.
4. Beven K., Binley A. The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrological Processes 1992, 6(3):279-298.
5. Beven K., Freer J. Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the glue methodology. Journal of Hydrology 2001, 249:11-29.
6. Brun R., Reichert P., Kunsch H.R. Practical identifiability analysis of large environmental simulation models. Water Resources Research 2001, 37(4):1015-1030.
7. Friedlingstein P., Meinshausen M., Arora V.K., Jones C.D., Anav A., Liddicoat S.K., Knutti R. Uncertainties in cmip5 climate projections due to carbon cycle feedbacks. Journal of Climate 2015/02/16 2013, 27(2):511-526.
8. Gaudinski J., Trumbore S., Davidson E., Zheng S. Soil carbon cycling in a temperate forest: radiocarbon-based estimates of residence times, sequestration rates and partitioning fluxes. Biogeochemistry 2000, 51:33-69.
9. German D.P., Marcelo K.R.B., Stone M.M., Allison S.D. The Michaelis-Menten kinetics of soil extracellular enzymes in response to temperature: a cross-latitudinal study. Global Change Biology 2012, 18(4):1468-1479.
10. Hararuk O., Luo Y. Improvement of global litter turnover rate predictions using a Bayesian MCMC approach. Ecosphere 2015/01/21 2014, 5(12). art163. URL. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/ES14-00092.1.
11. Hararuk O., Smith M.J., Luo Y. Microbial models with data-driven parameters predict stronger soil carbon responses to climate change. Global Change Biology 2015, 21:2439-2453. 10.1111/gcb.12827.
12. Luo Y., Weng E., Wu X., Gao C., Zhou X., Zhang L. Parameter identifiability, constraint, and equifinality in data assimilation with ecosystem models. Ecological Applications 2014/03/17 2009, 19(3):571-574.
13. Manzoni S., Porporato A. A theoretical analysis of nonlinearities and feedbacks in soil carbon and nitrogen cycles. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2007, 39(7):1542-1556.
14. Manzoni S., Porporato A. Soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization: theory and models across scales. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2009, 41(7):1355-1379.
15. Medlyn B.E., Robinson A.P., Clement R., McMurtrie R.E. On the validation of models of forest co2 exchange using eddy covariance data: some perils and pitfalls. Tree Physiology 2005, 25(7):839-857.
16. Nocedal J., Wright S. Numerical Optimization 2006, Springer Verlag. second ed.
17. Omlin M., Brun R., Reichert P. Biogeochemical model of Lake Zürich: sensitivity, identifiability and uncertainty analysis. Ecological Modelling 2001, 141(1-3):105-123.
18. Paustian K., Levine E., Post W.M., Ryzhova I.M. The use of models to integrate information and understanding of soil c at the regional scale. Geoderma 1997, 79(1-4):227-260.
19. Reichert P. UNCSIM - a computer programme for statistical inference and sensitivity, identifiability, and uncertainty analysis. Proceedings of the 2005 European Simulation and Modelling Conference (ESM 2005) 2005, 51-55. EUROSIS-ETI, Porto, Portugal. J. Teixeira, A. Carvalho-Brito (Eds.).
20. 2 efflux into C-pool-specific decay rates via inverse analysis of soil incubation data. Oecologia 2013, 171(3):721-732.
21. Schädel C., Schuur E.A.G., Bracho R., Elberling B., Knoblauch C., Lee H., Luo Y., Shaver G.R., Turetsky M.R. Circumpolar assessment of permafrost c quality and its vulnerability over time using long-term incubation data. Global Change Biology 2014, 20(2):641-652.
22. Schrumpf M., Kaiser K. Large differences in estimates of soil organic carbon turnover in density fractions by using single and repeated radiocarbon inventories. Geoderma 2015, 239-240(0):168-178.
23. Sierra C.A., Müller M. A general mathematical framework for representing soil organic matter dynamics. Ecological Monographs 2015, (in press). http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/15-0361.1.
24. Sierra C.A., Müller M., Trumbore S.E. Models of soil organic matter decomposition: the SoilR package, version 1.0. Geoscientific Model Development 2012, 5(4):1045-1060. gMD.
25. Sierra C.A., Müller M., Trumbore S.E. Modeling radiocarbon dynamics in soils: SoilR version 1.1. Geoscientific Model Development 2014, 7(5):1919-1931.
26. Sierra C.A., Trumbore S.E., Davidson E.A., Frey S.D., Savage K.E., Hopkins F.M. Predicting decadal trends and transient responses of radiocarbon storage and fluxes in a temperate forest soil. Biogeosciences 2012, 9(8):3013-3028. bG.
27. Soetaert K., Petzoldt T. Inverse modelling, sensitivity and Monte Carlo analysis in R using package FME. Journal of Statistical Software 2 2010, 33(3):1-28.
28. Swift M.J., Heal O.W., Anderson J.M. Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems 1979, University of California Press, Berkeley.
29. Todd-Brown K.E.O., Randerson J.T., Hopkins F., Arora V., Hajima T., Jones C., Shevliakova E., Tjiputra J., Volodin E., Wu T., Zhang Q., Allison S.D. Changes in soil organic carbon storage predicted by earth system models during the 21st century. Biogeosciences 2014, 11(8):2341-2356.
30. Todd-Brown K.E.O., Randerson J.T., Post W.M., Hoffman F.M., Tarnocai C., Schuur E.A.G., Allison S.D. Causes of variation in soil carbon simulations from CMIP5 earth system models and comparison with observations. Biogeosciences 2013, 10(3):1717-1736.
31. Tuomi M., Thum T., Järvinen H., Fronzek S., Berg B., Harmon M., Trofymow J., Sevanto S., Liski J. Leaf litter decomposition-estimates of global variability based on yasso07 model. Ecological Modelling 2009, 220(23):3362-3371.
32. Wang Y.-P., Leuning R., Cleugh H.A., Coppin P.A. Parameter estimation in surface exchange models using nonlinear inversion: how many parameters can we estimate and which measurements are most useful?. Global Change Biology 2001, 7(5):495-510.
33. Wetterstedt J.Å.M., Ågren G.I. Quality or decomposer efficiency: which is most important in the temperature response of litter decomposition? A modelling study using the glue methodology. Biogeosciences 2011, 8(2):477-487.
34. Wieder W.R., Boehnert J., Bonan G.B. Evaluating soil biogeochemistry parameterizations in earth system models with observations. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 2014, 28(3):211-222.
35. Wieder W.R., Bonan G.B., Allison S.D. Global soil carbon projections are improved by modelling microbial processes. Nature Climate Change 10 2013, 3(10):909-912.