Microbial diversity in innovative mesophilic/thermophilic temperature-phased anaerobic digestion of sludge

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Volumn 22, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 7339-7348

  Gagliano, M C ^a   Braguglia, C M ^a   Gallipoli, A ^a   Gianico, A ^a   Rossetti, S ^a  

^a WATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Fluorescence in situ hybridization; Mesophilic thermophilic dual stage; Methanogenic archaea; Microbial diversity; Syntrophic association; Ultrasounds pretreatment; Waste activated sludge

Indexed keywords

SEWAGE;

ANAEROBIC GROWTH; BACTERIUM; BIODIVERSITY; BIOMASS; BIOREACTOR; BIOREMEDIATION; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; SEWAGE; TEMPERATURE;

ANAEROBIOSIS; BACTERIA; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; BIODIVERSITY; BIOMASS; BIOREACTORS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; SEWAGE; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 84939895376     PISSN: 09441344     EISSN: 16147499     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-014-3061-y     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Amani T, Nosrati M, Sreekrishnan TR (2010) Anaerobic digestion from the viewpoint of microbiological, chemical, and operational aspects—a review. Environ Rev 18:255–278. doi:10.1139/A10-011
2. Amann R, Binder B (1990) Combination of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes with flow cytometry for analyzing mixed microbial populations. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:1919–1925
3. APHA (1998) APHA standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC
4. Ariesyady HD, Ito T, Okabe S (2007) Functional bacterial and archaeal community structures of major trophic groups in a full-scale anaerobic sludge digester. Water Res 41:1554–1568. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2006.12.036
5. Berger S, Welte C, Deppenmeier U (2012) Acetate activation in Methanosaeta thermophila: characterization of the key enzymes pyrophosphatase and acetyl-CoA synthetase. Archaea 2012:315153. doi:10.1155/2012/315153
6. Bougrier C, Carrère H, Delgenès JP (2005) Solubilisation of waste-activated sludge by ultrasonic treatment. Chem Eng J 106:163–169. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2004.11.013
7. Bougrier C, Albasi C, Delgenès JP, Carrère H (2006) Effect of ultrasonic, thermal and ozone pre-treatments on waste activated sludge solubilisation and anaerobic biodegradability. Chem Eng Process 45:711–718. doi:10.1016/j.cep.2006.02.005
8. Braguglia CM, Gagliano MC, Rossetti S (2012) High frequency ultrasound pretreatment for sludge anaerobic digestion: effect on floc structure and microbial population. Bioresour Technol 110:43–49. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.074
9. Carlsson M, Lagerkvist A, Morgan-Sagastume F (2012) The effects of substrate pre-treatment on anaerobic digestion systems: a review. Waste Manag 32:1634–1650. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2012.04.016
10. Carrère H, Dumas C, Battimelli A et al (2010) Pretreatment methods to improve sludge anaerobic degradability: a review. J Hazard Mater 183:1–15. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.06.129
11. Coelho NMG, Droste RL, Kennedy KJ (2011) Evaluation of continuous mesophilic, thermophilic and temperature phased anaerobic digestion of microwaved activated sludge. Water Res 45:2822–2834. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2011.02.032
12. Etchebehere C, Pavan ME, Zorzópulos J et al (1998) Coprothermobacter platensis sp. nov., a new anaerobic proteolytic thermophilic bacterium isolated from an anaerobic mesophilic sludge. Int J Syst Bacteriol 48(Pt 4):1297–1304
13. Ge H, Jensen PD, Batstone DJ (2010) Pre-treatment mechanisms during thermophilic–mesophilic temperature phased anaerobic digestion of primary sludge. Water Res 44:123–130. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2009.09.005
14. Ge H, Batstone DJ, Jensen PD (2012) Effect of temperature increase from 55 °C to 70 °C on anaerobic digestion: methanogenic activity and microbial community. In: Bianca Di Salvo, AWA Biosolids and Source Management National Conference: Program and Abstracts. AWA Biosolids and Source Management National Conference, Gold Coast, Qld., Australia (51–51). 18–20 June 2012. http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:278537
15. Gianico A, Braguglia CM, Cesarini R, Mininni G (2013) Reduced temperature hydrolysis at 134 °C before thermophilic anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge at increasing organic load. Bioresour Technol 143:96–103. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.05.069
16. Gianico A, Braguglia CM, Gallipoli A, Mininni G (2014) Sonication of waste activated sludge before two-stage mesophilic/thermophilic anaerobic semi-continuous process: performances and energy balance. Environ Sci Pollut Res (in press)
17. Hao L-P, Lü F, He P-J et al (2011) Predominant contribution of syntrophic acetate oxidation to thermophilic methane formation at high acetate concentrations. Environ Sci Technol 45:508–513. doi:10.1021/es102228v
18. Heip C (1974) A new index measuring evenness. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 54:555–557
19. Ho DP, Jensen PD, Batstone DJ (2013) Methanosarcinaceae and acetate-oxidizing pathways dominate in high-rate thermophilic anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:6491–6500. doi:10.1128/AEM.01730-13
20. Hori T, Haruta S, Ueno Y (2006) Dynamic transition of a methanogenic population in response to the concentration of volatile fatty acids in a thermophilic anaerobic digester. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:1623–1630. doi:10.1128/AEM.72.2.1623
21. Ike M, Inoue D, Miyano T et al (2010) Microbial population dynamics during startup of a full-scale anaerobic digester treating industrial food waste in Kyoto eco-energy project. Bioresour Technol 101:3952–3957. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.028
22. Karakashev D, Batstone DJ, Trably E, Angelidaki I (2006) Acetate oxidation is the dominant methanogenic pathway from acetate in the absence of Methanosaetaceae. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:5138–5141. doi:10.1128/AEM.00489-06
23. Krakat N, Westphal A, Schmidt S, Scherer P (2010) Anaerobic digestion of renewable biomass: thermophilic temperature governs methanogen population dynamics. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:1842–1850. doi:10.1128/AEM.02397-09
24. Lauwers J, Appels L, Thompson IP et al (2013) Mathematical modelling of anaerobic digestion of biomass and waste: Power and limitations. Prog Energy Combust Sci 39:383–402. doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2013.03.003
25. Lee M, Hidaka T, Tsuno H (2009) Two-phased hyperthermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge with kitchen garbage. J Biosci Bioeng 108:408–413. doi:10.1016/j.jbiosc.2009.05.011
26. Loy A, Maixner F, Wagner M, Horn M (2007) probeBase–an online resource for rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes: new features. Nucleic Acids Res 35:D800–D804. doi:10.1093/nar/gkl856
27. Lü F, Bize A, Guillot A et al (2014) Metaproteomics of cellulose methanisation under thermophilic conditions reveals a surprisingly high proteolytic activity. ISME J 8:88–102. doi:10.1038/ismej.2013.120
28. Majeed T, Tabassum R, Orts WJ, Lee CC (2013) Expression and characterization of coprothermobacter proteolyticus alkaline serine protease. Sci World J 2013:1–6. doi:10.1155/2013/396156
29. Merlino G, Rizzi A, Schievano A et al (2013) Microbial community structure and dynamics in two-stage vs single-stage thermophilic anaerobic digestion of mixed swine slurry and market bio-waste. Water Res 47:1983–1995. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2013.01.007
30. Montero B, García-Morales JL, Sales D, Solera R (2009) Analysis of methanogenic activity in a thermophilic-dry anaerobic reactor: use of fluorescent in situ hybridization. Waste Manag 29:1144–1151. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2008.08.010
31. Morgan R, Pihl T, Nölling J, Reeve JN (1997) Hydrogen regulation of growth, growth yields, and methane gene transcription in Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum deltaH. J Bacteriol 179:889–898
32. Nakamura K, Terada T, Sekiguchi Y et al (2006) Application of pseudomurein endoisopeptidase to fluorescence in situ hybridization of methanogens within the family Methanobacteriaceae. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:6907–6913. doi:10.1128/AEM.01499-06
33. Nelson MC, Morrison M, Yu Z (2011) A meta-analysis of the microbial diversity observed in anaerobic digesters. Bioresour Technol 102:3730–3739. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.119
34. O’Flaherty V, Collins G, Mahony T (2006) The microbiology and biochemistry of anaerobic bioreactors with relevance to domestic sewage treatment. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 5:39–55. doi:10.1007/s11157-005-5478-8
35. Ollivier BM, Mah RA, Ferguson TJ et al (1985) Emendation of the genus Thermobacteroides: Thermobacteroides proteolyticus sp. nov., a proteolytic acetogen from a methanogenic enrichment. Int J Syst Bacteriol 35:425–428. doi:10.1099/00207713-35-4-425
36. Paul E, Carrère H, Batstone DJ (2012) In: Paul E, Liu Y (eds) Biological sludge minimization and biomaterials/bioenergy recovery technologies. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey, pp 373–404
37. Pavlostathis S, Giraldo-Gomez E (1991) Kinetics of anaerobic treatment. Water Sci Technol 24:35–59
38. Pervin HM, Batstone DJ, Bond PL (2013a) Previously unclassified bacteria dominate during thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic pre-treatment of primary sludge. Syst Appl Microbiol 36:281–290. doi:10.1016/j.syapm.2013.03.003
39. Pervin HM, Dennis PG, Lim HJ et al (2013b) Drivers of microbial community composition in mesophilic and thermophilic temperature-phased anaerobic digestion pre-treatment reactors. Water Res 47:7098–7108. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2013.07.053
40. Sasaki K, Morita M, Sasaki D et al (2011) Syntrophic degradation of proteinaceous materials by the thermophilic strains Coprothermobacter proteolyticus and Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus. J Biosci Bioeng 112:469–472. doi:10.1016/j.jbiosc.2011.07.003
41. Shannon CE, Weaver W (1963) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana
42. Shi J, Wang Z, Stiverson JA et al (2013) Reactor performance and microbial community dynamics during solid-state anaerobic digestion of corn stover at mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. Bioresour Technol 136:574–581. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.073
43. Smith KS, Ingram-Smith C (2007) Methanosaeta, the forgotten methanogen? Trends Microbiol 15:150–155. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2007.02.002
44. Sundberg C, Al-Soud WA, Larsson M et al (2013) 454 Pyrosequencing analyses of bacterial and archaeal richness in 21 full-scale biogas digesters. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 85:612–626. doi:10.1111/1574-6941.12148
45. Tandishabo K, Nakamura K, Umetsu K, Takamizawa K (2012) Distribution and role of Coprothermobacter spp. in anaerobic digesters. J Biosci Bioeng 114:518–520. doi:10.1016/j.jbiosc.2012.05.023
46. Wilén B-M, Onuki M, Hermansson M et al (2008) Microbial community structure in activated sludge floc analysed by fluorescence in situ hybridization and its relation to floc stability. Water Res 42:2300–2308. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2007.12.013
47. Zamanzadeh M, Parker WJ, Verastegui Y, Neufeld JD (2013) Biokinetics and bacterial communities of propionate oxidizing bacteria in phased anaerobic sludge digestion systems. Water Res 47:1558–1569. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2012.12.015