Independent publications from Serbia in the Science Citation Index Expanded: a bibliometric analysis

Scientometrics

Volumn 101, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 603-622

  Ivanović, Dragan ^a   Ho, Yuh Shan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOVI SAD   (Serbia)

^b ASIA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Research trends; SCI EXPANDED; Serbia; Web of Science; Y Index

Indexed keywords

EID: 84939878823     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1396-2     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Adams, J. (2009). The use of bibliometrics to measure research quality in UK higher education institutions. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis,57(1), 19–32.
2. Allik, J. (2008). Quality of Estonian science estimated through bibliometric indicators. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences,57(4), 255–264.
3. American Psychological Association. (1953). Ethical standards of psychologists. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Inc.
4. Baltussen, A., & Kindler, C. H. (2004). Citation classics in critical care medicine. Intensive Care Medicine,30, 902–910.
5. Bencetić Klaić, Z., & Klaić, B. (1997). Croatia for the period of 1980–1996. Collegium Antropologicum,21(1), 301–318.
6. Bencetić Klaić, Z., & Klaić, B. (2004). Croatian scientific publications in top journals according to the Science Citation Index for the 1980–2000 Period. Scientometrics,61(2), 221–250.
7. Bhandari, M., Busse, J. W., Kulkarni, A. V., Devereaux, P. J., Leece, P., & Guyatt, G. H. (2004). Interpreting authorship order and corresponding authorship. Epidemiology,15(1), 125–126.
8. Borić, V., & Strujić, M. (2006). Bibliometric analysis of Acta Stomatologica Croatica: 1987–2006. Acta Stomatologica Croatica,40(4), 345–355.
9. Bornmann, L., Marx, W., Gasparyan, A. Y., & Kitas, G. (2012). Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics. Rheumatology International,32(7), 1861–1867.
10. Bouabid, H., & Martin, B. R. (2009). Evaluation of Moroccan research using a bibliometric-based approach: Investigation of the validity of the h-index. Scientometrics,78(2), 203–217.
11. Božin, B., Mimica-Dukić, N., Samojlik, I., & Jovin, E. (2007). Antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of rosemary and sage (Rosmarinus officinalis L., & Salvia officinalis L., Lamiaceae) essential oils. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,55(19), 7879–7885.
12. Burman, K. D. (1982). Hanging from the masthead—Reflections on authorship. Annals of Internal Medicine,97(4), 602–605.
13. Chiu, W. T., & Ho, Y. S. (2007). Bibliometric analysis of tsunami research. Scientometrics,73(1), 3–17.
14. Cvetićanin, L. (2006). Homotopy-perturbation method for pure nonlinear differential equation. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals,30(5), 1221–1230.
15. Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and ractise of the g-index. Scientometrics,69, 131–152.
16. Filipi-Matutinović, S. (2007). Citation analysis for five Serbian authors in Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar. Infoteka,8(1–2), 25–35.
17. Filipi-Matutinović, S., Popović, A., Avramović, B., & Klajn, I. (2009). Evaluation of scientific performance according to citation indexes in Serbia. INFORUM.
18. Fu, H. Z., Chuang, K. Y., Wang, M. H., & Ho, Y. S. (2011). Characteristics of research in China assessed with Essential Science Indicators. Scientometrics,88(3), 841–862.
19. Fu, H. Z., & Ho, Y. S. (2013). Independent research of China in Science Citation Index Expanded during 1980–2011. Journal of Informetrics,7(1), 210–222.
20. Furlan, J. C., & Fehlings, M. G. (2006). A web-based systematic review on traumatic spinal cord injury comparing the “citation classics” with the consumers’ perspectives. Journal of Neurotrauma,23(2), 156–169.
21. Glänzel, W., Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (2002). A relational charting approach to the world of basic research in twelve science fields at the end of the second millennium. Scientometrics,55(3), 335–348.
22. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,102(46), 16569–16572.
23. Ho, Y. S. (2012). Top-cited articles in chemical engineering in Science Citation Index Expanded: A bibliometric analysis. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering,20(3), 478–488.
24. Ho, Y. S. (2013). The top-cited research works in the Science Citation Index Expanded. Scientometrics,94(3), 1297–1312.
25. Ho, Y. S. (2014). Classic articles on social work field in Social Science Citation Index: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics,98(1), 137–155.
26. Ho, Y. S., Satoh, H., & Lin, S. Y. (2010). Japanese lung cancer research trends and performance in Science Citation Index. Internal Medicine,49(20), 2219–2228.
27. Hu, X., & Rousseau, R. (2009). A comparative study of the difference in research performance in biomedical fields among selected Western and Asian countries. Scientometrics,81(2), 475–491.
28. Huang, M. H., Lin, C. S., & Chen, D. Z. (2011). Counting methods, country rank changes, and counting inflation in the assessment of national research productivity and impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,62(12), 2427–2436.
29. Ilić, D., & Rakočević, V. (2008). Common fixed points for maps on cone metric space. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications,341(2), 876–882.
30. Jaćimović, J., Petrović, R., & Živković, S. (2010). A citation analysis of Serbian Dental Journal using Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar. Stomatoloski glasnik Srbije,57(4), 201–211.
31. Jeenah, M., & Pouris, A. (2008). South African research in the context of Africa and globally. South African Journal of Science,104(9–10), 351–354.
32. Jin, B. H. (2006). h-Index: An evaluation indicator proposed by scientist. Science Focus,1, 8–9.
33. Jin, B. H., Liang, L. M., Rousseau, R., & Egghe, L. (2007). The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index. Chinese Science Bulletin,52(6), 855–863.
34. King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature,430(6997), 311–316.
35. Klaić, B. (1997). Analysis of scientific productivity in Croatia according to the Science Citation Index, Social Science Citation Index, and Arts and Humanities Citation Index for the 1980–1995 period. Croatian Medical Journal,38, 88–98.
36. Kostoff, R., Barth, R., & Lau, C. (2008). Quality vs. quantity of publications in nanotechnology field from the People’s Republic of China. Chinese Science Bulletin,53(8), 1272–1280.
37. Leta, J., & Chaimovich, H. (2002). Recognition and international collaboration—The Brazilian case. Scientometrics,53(2), 325–335.
38. Leydesdorff, L. (2012). World shares of publications of the USA, EU-27, and China compared and predicted using the new Web of Science interface versus Scopus. Profesional de la Información,21(1), 43–49.
39. Lucio-Arias, D., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). An indicator of research front activity: Measuring intellectual organization as uncertainty reduction in document sets. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,60(12), 2488–2498.
40. Markusova, V. A., Jansz, M., Libkind, A. N., Libkind, I., & Varshavsky, A. (2009). Trends in Russian research output in post-Soviet era. Scientometrics,79(2), 249–260.
41. Moed, H. F. (2006). Bibliometric rankings of world universities. CWTS Report, 1.
42. Moed, H. F., Burger, W. J. M., Frankfort, J. G., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1985). The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance. Research Policy,14(3), 131–149.
43. Moed, H. F., De Bruin, R. E., & Van Leeuwen, T. N. (1995). New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications. Scientometrics,33(3), 381–422.
44. Moravcsik, M. J. (1985). Applied scientometrics: An assessment methodology for developing countries. Scientometrics,7(3–6), 165–176.
45. National Science Board. (2010). Science and Engineering Indicators 2010. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation (NSB 10-01).
46. Popović, A., Antonić, S., & Matutinović, S. F. (2012). Rapid changes of Serbian scientific journals: Their quality, visibility and role in science locally and globally. In E-Science and information management (pp. 61–70). Berlin: Springer.
47. Rousseau, R., & Ye, F. Y. (2008). A proposal for a dynamic h-type index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,59(11), 1853–1855.
48. Schubert, A. (2012). A Hirsch-type index of co-author partnership ability. Scientometrics,91(1), 303–308.
49. Schubert, A., & Glänzel, W. (2007). A systematic analysis of Hirsch-type indices for journals. Journal of Informetrics,1(3), 179–184.
50. Schubert, A., Glänzel, W., & Braun, T. (1989). Scientometric datafiles: A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major science fields and subfields 1981–1985. Scientometrics,16(1–6), 3–478.
51. Šćiban, M., Radetić, B., Kevrešan, Ž., & Klašnja, M. (2007). Adsorption of heavy metals from electroplating wastewater by wood sawdust. Bioresource Technology,98(2), 402–409.
52. Ševkušić, M., & Uskoković, D. (2009). State of the art in nanoscience and nanotechnology in Serbia: A preliminary bibliometric analysis. Tehnika-Novi materijali,18(5), 1–16.
53. Šipka, P. (2005). Social sciences in Serbia, with Momirović and without him: A bibliometric portrait. Psihologija,38(3), 345–360.
54. Šipka, P. (2012). Bibliometric quality of Serbian Journals 2002–2011: More than just a dress for success. In International Open Access Conference (p. 161).
55. 2+from aqueous solutions by hydroxyapatite. Water Research,40(12), 2267–2274.
56. Stevic, S. (2008). Norm of weighted composition operators from bloch space to H-mu(infinity) on the unit ball. Ars Combinatoria,88, 125–128.
57. Stević, S. (2006). Composition operators between H-infinity and a-Bloch spaces on the polydisc. Zeitschrift für Analysis und ihre Anwendungen,25(4), 457–466.
58. Stević, S. (2007). Existence of nontrivial solutions of a rational difference equation. Applied Mathematics Letters,20(1), 28–31.
59. Stević, S. (2009). On a new integral-type operator from the Bloch space to Bloch-type spaces on the unit ball. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications,354(2), 426–434.
60. Thomaidis, N. S., Georgiou, C. A., & Calokerinos, A. C. (2004). Analytical chemistry in Balkan and East Mediterranean countries during 1994–2001. Analytica Chimica Acta,505(1), 3–8.
61. Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology,5(1), e18.
62. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2008). Generalizing the h- and g-indices. Journal of Informetrics,2(4), 263–271.
63. Veljković, V. B., Lakićević, S. H., Stamenković, O. S., Todorović, Z. B., & Lazić, M. L. (2006). Biodiesel production from tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) seed oil with a high content of free fatty acids. Fuel,85(17), 2671–2675.
64. Wang, M. H., Yu, T. C., & Ho, Y. S. (2010). A bibliometric analysis of the performance of Water Research. Scientometrics,84(3), 813–820.
65. Wren, J. D., Kozak, K. Z., Johnson, K. R., Deakyne, S. J., Schilling, L. M., & Dellavalle, R. P. (2007). The write position. EMBO Reports,8(11), 988–991.
66. Xie, S. D., Zhang, J., & Ho, Y. S. (2008). Assessment of world aerosol research trends by bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics,77(1), 113–130.
67. Zhang, G. F., Xie, S. D., & Ho, Y. S. (2010). A bibliometric analysis of world volatile organic compounds research trends. Scientometrics,83(2), 477–492.