Transient tasks and enduring emotions: the impacts of affective content, task relevance, and picture duration on the sustained late positive potential

Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 45-54

  Gable, Philip A ^a   Adams, David L ^a   Proudfit, Greg Hajcak ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

^b STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Affective content; Late positive potential (LPP); Picture duration; Task relevance

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BRAIN CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EMOTION; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EMOTIONS; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84939877704     PISSN: 15307026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13415-014-0313-8     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Codispoti, M., Ferrari, V., & Bradley, M. M. (2006). Repetitive picture processing: Autonomic and cortical correlates. Brain Research, 1068, 213–220. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2005.11.009
2. Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42–45.
3. Cuthbert, B. N., Schupp, H. T., Bradley, M. M., Birbaumer, N., & Lang, P. J. (2000). Brain potentials in affective picture processing: Covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report. Biological Psychology, 52, 95–111. doi:10.1016/S0301-0511(99)00044-7
4. Dunning, J., & Hajcak, G. (2009). See no evil: Directing visual attention within unpleasant images modulates the electrocortical response. Psychophysiology, 46, 28–33.
5. Ferrari, V., Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., & Lang, P. J. (2010). Detecting novelty and significance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 404–411. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21244
6. Ferrari, V., Codispoti, M., Cardinale, R., & Bradley, M. M. (2008). Directed and motivated attention during processing of natural scenes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1753–1761. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20121
7. Foti, D., Hajcak, G., & Dien, J. (2009). Differentiating neural responses to emotional pictures: Evidence from temporal–spatial PCA. Psychophysiology, 46, 521–530. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00796.x
8. Franken, I. H., Nijs, I., & Pepplinkhuizen, L. (2008). Effects of dopaminergic modulation on electrophysiological brain response to affective stimuli. Psychopharmacology, 195, 537–546.
9. Gable, P. A., & Adams, D. L. (2013). Non-affective motivation modulates the sustained LPP (1, 000–2,000 ms). Psychophysiology, 12, 1251–1254.
10. Gable, P. A., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2010). The effect of low versus high approach-motivated positive affect on memory for peripherally versus centrally presented information. Emotion, 10, 599–603. doi:10.1037/a0018426
11. Gable, P. A., & Poole, B. D. (2012). Influence of trait behavioral inhibition and behavioral approach motivation systems on the LPP and frontal asymmetry to anger pictures. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 182–190. doi:10.1093/scan/nss130
12. Hajcak, G., Dunning, J., & Foti, D. (2009). Motivated and controlled attention to emotion: Time-course of the late positive potential. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120, 505–510.
13. Hajcak, G., & Olvet, D. M. (2008). The persistence of attention to emotion: Brain potentials during and after picture presentation. Emotion, 8, 250–255. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.8.2.250
14. Ito, T. A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2000). Electrophysiological evidence of implicit and explicit categorization processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 660–676.
15. Keil, A., Müller, M., Gruber, T., Wienbruch, C., Stolarova, M., & Elbert, T. (2001). Effects of emotional arousal in the cerebral hemispheres: A study of oscillatory brain activity and event-related potentials. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112, 2057–2068.
16. Kok, A. (2001). On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology, 38, 557–577.
17. Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2008). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual (Technical Report No. A-8). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Center for Research in Psychophysiology.
18. Moratti, S., Saugar, C., & Strange, B. A. (2011). Prefrontal-occipitoparietal coupling underlies late latency human neuronal responses to emotion. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 17278–17286.
19. Pastor, M. C., Bradley, M. M., Löw, A., Versace, F., Moltó, J., & Lang, P. J. (2008). Affective picture perception: Emotion, context, and the late positive potential. Brain Research, 1189, 145–151. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.072
20. Sabatinelli, D., Keil, A., Frank, D. W., & Lang, P. J. (2013). Emotional perception: Correspondence of early and late event-related potentials with cortical and subcortical functional MRI. Biological Psychology, 92, 513–519. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.04.005
21. Schupp, H. T., Cuthbert, B. N., Bradley, M. M., Hillman, C. H., Hamm, A. O., & Lang, P. J. (2004). Brain processes in emotional perception: Motivated attention. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 593–611.
22. Semlitsch, H. V., Anderer, P., Schuster, P., & Presslich, O. (1986). A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artefacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology, 23, 695–703. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00696.x
23. Weinberg, A., Ferri, J., & Hajcak, G. (2013). Interactions between attention and emotion: Insights from the late positive potential. In M. D. Robinson, E. R. Watkins, & E. Harmon-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 35–54). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24. Weinberg, A., & Hajcak, G. (2011). The late positive potential predicts subsequent interference with target processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 2994–3007. doi:10.1162/jocn.2011.21630
25. Weinberg, A., Hilgard, J., Bartholow, B., & Hajcak, G. (2012). Emotional targets: Evaluative categorization as a function of context and content. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 84, 149–154. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.01.023