Study on dynamic evolution of operators' behavior in digital nuclear power plant main control room - Part I: Qualitative analysis

Safety Science

Volumn 80, Issue , 2015, Pages 296-300

  Zou, Yanhua ^a,b   Zhang, Li ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CHINA   (China)

^b HUNAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Boolean network; Digital main control room; Dynamic evolution; Human reliability analysis; Operators' behavior; Semi tensor product

Indexed keywords

ALGEBRA; COMPLEX NETWORKS; LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS; NUCLEAR ENERGY; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; RELIABILITY; TENSORS;

BOOLEAN NETWORKS; DYNAMIC EVOLUTION; HUMAN RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; MAIN CONTROL ROOM; SEMI-TENSOR PRODUCT;

RELIABILITY ANALYSIS;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; DIGITALIZATION; EMPLOYEE ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INFORMATION SCIENCE; JOB PERFORMANCE; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR POWER PLANT; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY; OPERATOR; PLANNING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS MONITORING; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; WORK ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 84939780454     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: 18791042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.033     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Acosta C., Siu N. Dynamic event trees in accident sequence analysis: application to steam generator tube rupture. Reliability Eng. Syst. Saf. 1993, 41:135.
2. Cheng Dai-zhan, Qi Hong-sheng Semi-Tensor Product of Matrices: Theory and Applications 2007, Science Press, Beijing.
3. Cheng Dai-zhan, Qi Hong-sheng, Zhao Yin Analysis and control of boolean networks: a semi-tensor product approach. Acta Automatica Sin. 2011, 37:529-540.
4. Cheng Daizhan, Qi Hongsheng, Li Zhiqiang Model construction of boolean network via observed data. IEEE Trans. Neural Network 2011, 22:525-536.
5. Dipl.Phys.Florian Greil Dynamics of Boolean Networks 2009, Technische Universitat Darmstadt.
6. Gertman D., Blackman H., Marble J., Byers J., Smith C. The SPAR-H Human Reliability Analysis Method (NUREG/CR-6683) 2005, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington.
7. Gu Pengfei, Zhang Jianbo, Sun Yongbin The human reliability in the accident processing of NPP. Sci. Technol. Rev. 2012, 30:51-55.
8. Hu Hong, Zhang Li, Jiang Jianjun, Yi Cannan, Dai Licao, Chen Qingqing Visual monitoring path forecasting method for digital human-computer interface in nuclear power plant and its application. Nucl. Power Eng. 2014, 3:105-110.
9. Jiang Jian-jun, Zhang Li, Wang Yi-qun, Peng Yu-yuan, Kun Zhang, He Wen Markov reliability model research of monitoring process in digital main control room of nuclear power plant. Saf. Sci. 2011, 49(6):843-851.
10. Kauffman Stuart A. Homeostasis and differentiation in random genetic control networks. Nature 1969, 224(5215):177-178.
11. Liu P., Li Z. Comparison between conventional and digital nuclear power plant main control rooms: a task complexity perspective, part I: overall results and analysis. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2014, 10.1016/j.ergon.
12. Liu P., Li Z. Comparison between conventional and digital nuclear power plant main control rooms: a task complexity perspective, part II: detailed results and analysis. Int. J. Indust. Ergonom. 2014, 10.1016/j.ergon.
13. Mohaghegh Zahra, Kazemi Reza, Mosleh Ali Incorporating organizational factors into probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) of complex socio-technical systems: a hybrid technique formalization. Reliability Eng. Syst. Saf. 2009, 94:1000-1018.
14. Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research Reactor Safety Study: An Assessment of Accident Risks in U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants (WASH-1400) 1975, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.
15. O'Hare John M., Higgins James C., Kramer Joel Advanced Information System Design: Technical Basis and human factors Review Guidance (NUREG/CR-6633) 2000, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.
16. O'Hare John M., Higgins James C., Stubler William F., Kramer Joel Computer-Based Procedure Systems: Technical Basis and Human Factors Review Guidance (NUREG/CR-6634) 2000, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.
17. O'Hare John M., Higgins J.C., Brown W.S., Fink R., Persensky J., Lewis P., Kramer J., Szabo A. Human Factors Considerations with Respect to Emerging Technology in Nuclear Power Plants (NUREG/CR-6947) 2008, U.S., Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.
18. Psychology Software Tools, INC. http://www.pstnet.com.
19. Baron, Sheldon, Kruser, Dana S., Messick, Beverly, 1990. Quantitative Modeling of Human Performance in Complex, Dynamic Systems. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/1490.html.
20. Sterman J. Business Dynamics; System Thinking and Modeling for Complex World 2000, Mc Graw-Hill Companies.
21. Urbanic, R.J., Bacioiu, G.M., 2013. Using a systems dynamics model to assess skill level impact. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Industrial and Systems Engineering Research Conference.
22. World Nuclear Association, 2013. Nuclear Power in China. http://www.world%20nuclear.org.
23. Zhang Li, Yang Da-xin, Wang Yi-qun The effect of information display on human reliability in a digital control room. China Saf. Sci. J. 2010, 20:81-85.
24. Zhou Yong, Mou Hai Ying, Jiang Jianjun, Zhang Li Investigation of the impact of main control room digitalization on operators' cognitive reliability in nuclear power plant. Work 2012, 41:714-721.
25. Zhou Yong, Zhang Li, Mou Hai-ying, Li Peng-cheng Effects of digitalized main control room on operators' implementing situation assessment task in nuclear power plant. China Saf. Sci. J. 2013, 23(1):41-47.