Markov reliability model research of monitoring process in digital main control room of nuclear power plant

Safety Science

Volumn 49, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 843-851

  Jiang, Jian jun ^a,c   Zhang, Li ^a,b   Wang, Yi qun ^a   Peng, Yu yuan ^c   Zhang, Kun ^a   He, Wen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CHINA   (China)

^b HUNAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^c Guangzhou Kangda Vocational Technical College   (China)

Author keywords

Digital main control room; Markov model; Probability distributed function; Probability of correlation degree

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION DEGREE; DIGITAL HUMANS; DISTRIBUTED FUNCTION; HIGH SAFETY; HUMAN FACTORS; MAIN CONTROL ROOM; MARKOV MODEL; MONITORING PROCESS; PROBABILITY CALCULATIONS; PROBABILITY EVALUATION; RELIABILITY MODEL; SYSTEM STATE; TRANSITION PROBABILITIES;

DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; MARKOV PROCESSES; MONITORING; NUCLEAR ENERGY; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; PROBABILITY;

PROCESS CONTROL;

ALARM MONITOR; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DIGITAL COMPUTER; HUMAN FACTORS RESEARCH; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; MARKOV RELIABILITY MODEL; NUCLEAR POWER PLANT; NUCLEAR SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROCESS MONITORING; RELIABILITY;

EID: 79955670867     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.01.014     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Adamyan Angela, He David Analysis of sequential failures for assessment of reliability and safety of manufacturing systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2002, 76(3):227-236.
2. Bertolini Massimo Assessment of human reliability factors: a fuzzy cognitive maps approach. International of Industrial Ergonomics 2007, 37:405-413.
3. Bucci P., Kirschenbaum J., Mangan L.A., Aldemir T., Smith C., Wood T. Construction of event-tree/fault-tree models from a Markov approach to dynamic system. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2008, 93(11):1616-1627.
4. Chang Y.H.J., Mosleh A. Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents, part 4: IDAC causal model of operator problem-solving response. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2007, 92:1061-1075.
5. Chin Kwai-Sang, Tang Da-Wei, Yang Jian-Bo, Wong Shui Yee, Wang Hong-wei Assessing new product development project risk by Bayesian network with a systematic probability generation methodology. Expert System with Application 2009, 36(6):9879-9890.
6. Doguc O., Ramirez-Marquez J.E. A generic method for estimating system reliability using Bayesian networks. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2009, 94:542-550.
7. Dugan J.B., Boudali H. A discrete-time Bayesian network reliability modeling and analysis framework. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2005, 87:337-349.
8. Guo H., Yang X. Automatic creation of Markov models for reliability assessment of safety instrumented systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2008, 93(6):829-837.
9. Hart S., Wickens C. Workload assessment and prediction. MANPRINT: An Emerging Technology, Advanced Concepts for Integrating People, Machine, and Organization 1990, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY. H. Booher (Ed.).
10. He Xu-Hong, Huang Xiang-Rui Human reliability analysis: theory, methods and applications in industrial system 2007, QingHua University Press, Beijing, China.
11. Kim J. Vicente, Randall J. Mumaw, Emilie M. Roth, 1997. Cognitive Functioning of Control Room Operators: Final Phase. AECB Report, Ottawa, Ontario, June 27.
12. Kim, J., Pearl, J., 1983. A computational model for combined causal and diagnostic reasoning in inference system. In: Proceedings of the Eight International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Karlsruhe, pp. 380-385.
13. Kim Man Cheol, Seong Poong Hyun A computational model for knowledge-driven monitoring of nuclear power plant operators based on information theory. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2006, 91:283-291.
14. Kim Man Chel, Seong Poong Hyun A computational model for knowledge-driven monitoring of nuclear power plant operators based on information theory. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2006, 91:283-291.
15. Kohda Takehisa, Cui Weimin Risk-based reconfiguration of safety monitoring system using dynamic Bayesian network. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2007, 92:1716-1723.
16. Lee Hyun-Chul, Seong Poong-Hyun A computational model for evaluating the effects of attention, memory, and mental models on situation assessment of nuclear power plant operators. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2009, 94(11):1796-1805.
17. Li J.-A., Wu Y., Lai K.K., Liu K. Reliability estimation and prediction of multi-state components and coherent systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2005, 88(1):93-98.
18. Ma Y., Trivedi K.S. An algorithm for reliability analysis of phased-mission systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 1999, 66(2):157-170.
19. Mahadevan S., Zhang R., Smith N. Bayesian networks for system reliability reassessment. Structural Safety 2001, 23:231-251.
20. O'Hara, J.M., Brown, W.S., 2002. The effects of interface management tasks on crew performance and safety in complex, computer-based system: detailed analysis. Division of System Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC, NRC Job Code W6546.NUREG/CR-6690, vol. 2, BNL-NUREG-52656, vol. 2.
21. Qian Wei-dong, Liu Zhi-qing Road traffic accident forecast based on Gray-Markov model. China Safety Science Journal, China 2008, 18(3):33-36.
22. Raby M., Wickens C. Strategic workload management and decision bias in aviation. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 1994, 4:211-240.
23. Rasmussen J. Skills, rules, knowledge: signal, signs, and symbols and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 1983, 13:257-267.
24. Sahin F., Yavuz M.C., Arnavut Z., Uluyol O. Fault diagnosis for airplane engines using Bayesian networks and distributed particle swarm optimization. Parallel Computing 2007, 33:124-143.
25. Shen S.-H., Smidts C., Mosleh A. A methodology for collection and analysis of human error data based on a cognitive model: IDA. Nuclear Engineering and Design 1997, 172:157-186.
26. Sheridan T. Understanding human error and aiding human diagnostic behavior in nuclear power plants. Human Detection and Diagnosis of System Failures 1980, Plenum Press, New York, NY. J. Rasmussen, W. Rouse (Eds.).
27. Stadelmann W. NOVA: a computer-aided system to monitor proper behaviour of plant components in the Gundremmingen nuclear power plant (KRB II). Nuclear Engineering and Design 1998, 183(1-2):169-172.
28. Tai A.H., Ching W.-K., Chan L.Y. Detection of machine failure: hidden Markov model approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2009, 57:608-619.
29. Verwey W.B. How can we prevent overload of the driver. Driving Future Vehicles 1993, 235-244. Taylor & Francis, London. A.M. Parkes, S. Franzen (Eds.).
30. Vicente Kim J., Roth Emilie M., Mumaw Randall J. How do operators monitor a complex, dynamic work domain?. Human-Computer Studies 2001, 54:831-856.
31. Zhang Li Human Factors Reliability Analysis Technique in PSA 2006, Atomic Energy Press, Beijing, China.
32. Zhou Ling, Yau Stephen Efficient association rule mining among both frequent and infrequent items. Computers and Mathematics with Application 2007, 54:737-749.