Credibility of observational studies: Why public health researchers should care?

European Journal of Public Health

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 554-555

  Boccia, Stefania ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PUBLIC HEALTH; STANDARDS;

EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; HUMANS; OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES AS TOPIC; PUBLIC HEALTH; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84939646668     PISSN: 11011262     EISSN: 1464360X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv119     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Dal-Ré R, Ioannidis JP, Bracken MB, et al. Making prospective registration of observational research a reality. Sci Transl Med 2014; 6: 224cm1
2. Boccia S, Rothman KJ, Panic N, et al. Registration practices for non-randomised epidemiologic studies on clinical trials.gov indicate low adherence. J Clin Epidemiol, (under revision
3. Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, et al. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet 2014; 383: 156-65
4. Ioannidis JP, Greenland S, Hlatky MA, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet 2014; 383: 166-75
5. Chan AW, Song F, Vickers A, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research. Lancet 2014; 383: 257-66