Causal interaction and external validity: Obstacles to the policy relevance of randomized evaluations

World Bank Economic Review

Volumn 29, Issue , 2015, Pages S217-S225

  Muller, Seán M ^a  

^a Parliamentary Budget Office ^*  (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMETRICS; ECONOMIC POLICY; NUMERICAL MODEL; POLICY MAKING;

EID: 84939629823     PISSN: 02586770     EISSN: 1564698X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/wber/lhv027     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Allcott, H., and S. Mullainathan. 2012. "External Validity and Partner Selection Bias." NBER Working Paper 18373.
2. Angrist, J., and I. Fernandez-Vá l. 2013. "ExtrapoLATE-ing: External Validity and Overidentification in the LATE Framework." In D. Acemoglu, M. Arellano, and E. Dekel, eds., Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Econometric Society Monographs, Tenth World Congress.Vol. III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Angrist, J. D., and J.-S. Pischke. 2010. "The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design Is Taking the Con out of Econometrics." Journal of Economic Perspectives 24 (2): 3-30.
4. Bold, T., M. Kimenyi, G. Mwabu, A. Ngángá, and J. Sandefur. 2013. "Scaling Up What Works: Experimental Evidence on External Validity in Kenyan Education." Center for Global Development Working Paper 321.
5. Campbell, D. T., and J. C. Stanley. 1966. Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing.
6. Cartwright, N. 2010. "What Are Randomised Controlled Trials Good For?" Philosophical Studies 147: 59-70.
7. Cook, T. D., and D. T. Campbell. 1979. Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Belmont, CA:Wadsworth.
8. Crump, R. K., V. J. Hotz, G. W. Imbens, and O. A. Mitnik. 2008. "Nonparametric Tests for Treatment Effect Heterogeneity." Review of Economics and Statistics 90 (3): 389-405.
9. Deaton, A. 2010. "Instruments, Randomization, and Learning about Development." Journal of Economic Literature 48 (2): 424-55.
10. Duflo, E., R. Glennerster, and M. Kremer. 2006. "Using Randomization in Development Economics Research: A Toolkit." In T. Schultz, and J. Strauss, eds., Handbook of Development Economics.Vol. 4. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
11. Hotz, V., G. W. Joseph, Imbens, and J. H. Mortimer. 2005. "Predicting the Efficacy of Future Training Programs Using Past Experiences at Other Locations." Journal of Econometrics 125: 241-70.
12. Imbens, G. W. 2010. "Better LATE than Nothing: Some Comments on Deaton (2009) and Heckman and Urzua (2009)." Journal of Economic Literature 48 (2): 399-423.
13. Keane, Michael P. 2010. "Structural vs. Atheoretic Approaches to Econometrics." Journal of Econometrics 156 (1): 3-20.
14. Leamer, Edward. 2010. "Tantalus on the Road to Asymptopia." Journal of Economic Perspectives 24 (2): 31-46.
15. Manski, Charles F. 2013. Public Policy in an Uncertain World: Analysis and Decisions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Muller, S. M. 2014. "Randomised Trials for Policy: A Review of the External Validity of Treatment Effects." Southern Africa Labour and Development Research UnitWorking Paper 127.
17. Pritchett, L., and J. Sandefur. 2013. "Context Matters for Size." Center for Global DevelopmentWorking Paper 336.
18. Rodrik, D. 2008. "The New Development Economics: We Shall Experiment, but How Shall We Learn?" Harvard Kennedy SchoolWorking Paper, RWP08-055.
19. Rothwell, Peter M. 2005. "Subgroup Analysis in Randomised Controlled Trials: Importance, Indications, and Interpretation." Lancet 365: 176-86.