Differences in fMRI intersubject correlation while viewing unedited and edited videos of dance performance

Cortex

Volumn 71, Issue , 2015, Pages 341-348

  Herbec, Aleksandra ^a   Kauppi, Jukka Pekka ^b   Jola, Corinne ^c   Tohka, Jussi ^d,e   Pollick, Frank E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ABERTAY DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID   (Spain)

^e HOSPITAL GENERAL UNIVERSITARIO GREGORIO MARAÑÓN   (Spain)

Author keywords

Dance; FMRI; Intersubject correlation; Natural movies; Vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; AUDITORY CORTEX; BRAIN FUNCTION; CAMERA; CINGULATE GYRUS; DANCING; FEMALE; FRONTAL CORTEX; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMAN; INFERIOR FRONTAL GYRUS; INTERSUBJECT CORRELATION; LINGUAL GYRUS; MALE; MIDDLE FRONTAL GYRUS; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PARIETAL CORTEX; POSTCENTRAL GYRUS; PRECUNEUS; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; SUPERIOR FRONTAL GYRUS; SUPERIOR TEMPORAL GYRUS; TEMPORAL CORTEX; TEMPORAL GYRUS; TEMPORAL LOBE; THALAMUS; VIDEORECORDING; VISUAL CORTEX; ALGORITHM; BRAIN MAPPING; FRONTAL LOBE; IMAGE PROCESSING; INDIVIDUALITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARIETAL LOBE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; BRAIN MAPPING; DANCING; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INDIVIDUALITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PARIETAL LOBE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; TEMPORAL LOBE; VIDEO RECORDING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84939601162     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 19738102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.06.026     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Abrams D.A., Ryali S., Chen T., Chordia P., Khouzam A., Levitin D.J., et al. Inter-subject synchronization of brain responses during natural music listening. European Journal of Neuroscience 2013, 37(9):1458-1469.
2. Bartels A., Zeki S. The chronoarchitecture of the human brain-natural viewing conditions reveal a time-based anatomy of the brain. NeuroImage 2004, 22(1):419-433.
3. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 1995, 57:289-300.
4. Berman R.A., Colby C.L., Genovese C.R., Voyvodic J.T., Luna B., Thulborn K.R., et al. Cortical networks subserving pursuit and saccadic eye movements in humans: an FMRI study. Human Brain Mapping 1999, 8(4):209-225.
5. Cantlon J.F., Li R. Neural activity during natural viewing of Sesame Street statistically predicts test scores in early childhood. PLoS Biology 2013, 11(1):e1001462.
6. Cross E.S., Hamilton A.F., Grafton S.T. Building a motor simulation de novo: observation of dance by dancers. NeuroImage 2006, 31(3):1257-1267.
7. Cutting J.E., DeLong J.E., Nothelfer C.E. Attention and the evolution of Hollywood film. Psychological Science 2010, 21(3):432-439.
8. Dorr M., Martinetz T., Gegenfurtner K.R., Barth E. Variability of eye movements when viewing dynamic natural scenes. Journal of Vision 2010, 10(10):28.
9. Grabski K., Lamalle L., Vilain C., Schwartz J.-L., Vallée N., Tropres I., et al. Functional MRI assessment of orofacial articulators: neural correlates of lip, jaw, larynx, and tongue movements. Human Brain Mapping 2012, 33(10):2306-2321.
10. Grosbras M.-H., Beaton S., Eickhoff S.B. Brain regions involved in human movement perception: a quantitative voxel-based meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping 2011, 33(2):431-454.
11. Hasson U., Avidan G., Gelbard H., Vallines I., Harel M., Minshew N., et al. Shared and idiosyncratic cortical activation patterns in autism revealed under continuous real-life viewing conditions. Autism Research: Official Journal of the International Society for Autism Research 2009, 2(4):220-231.
12. Hasson U., Furman O., Clark D., Dudai Y., Davachi L. Enhanced intersubject correlations during movie viewing correlate with successful episodic encoding. Neuron 2008, 57(3):452-462.
13. Hasson U., Ghazanfar A.A., Galantucci B., Garrod S., Keysers C. Brain-to-brain coupling: a mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2012, 16(2):114-121.
14. Hasson U., Landesman O., Knappmeyer B., Vallines I., Rubin N., Heeger D.J. Neurocinematics: the neuroscience of film. Projections 2008, 2(1):1-26.
15. Hasson U., Malach R., Heeger D.J. Reliability of cortical activity during natural stimulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2010, 14(1):40-48.
16. Hasson U., Nir Y., Levy I., Fuhrmann G., Malach R. Intersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision. Science 2004, 303(5664):1634-1640.
17. Hasson U., Yang E., Vallines I., Heeger D.J., Rubin N. A hierarchy of temporal receptive windows in human cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28(10):2539-2550.
18. Hejnar M.P., Kiehl K.A., Calhoun V.D. Interparticipant correlations: a model free FMRI analysis technique. Human Brain Mapping 2007, 28(9):860-867.
19. Jääskeläinen I.P., Koskentalo K., Balk M.H., Autti T., Kauramäki J., Pomren C., et al. Inter-subject synchronization of prefrontal cortex hemodynamic activity during natural viewing. The Open Neuroimaging Journal 2008, 2:14-19.
20. Jola C., Abedian-Amiri A., Kuppuswamy A., Pollick F.E., Grosbras M.-H. Motor simulation without motor expertise: enhanced corticospinal excitability in visually experienced dance spectators. PLoS One 2012, 7(3):e33343.
21. Jola C., McAleer P., Grosbras M.-H., Love S.A., Morison G., Pollick F.E. Uni- and multisensory brain areas are synchronised across spectators when watching unedited dance recordings. i-Perception 2013, 4(4):265-284.
22. Kauppi J.-P., Jääskeläinen I.P., Sams M., Tohka J. Inter-subject correlation of brain hemodynamic responses during watching a movie: localization in space and frequency. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics 2010, 4.
23. Kauppi J.-P., Pajula J., Tohka J. A versatile software package for inter-subject correlation based analyses of fMRI. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics 2014, 8:2.
24. van Kesteren M.T.R., Fernandez G., Norris D.G., Hermans E.J. Persistent schema-dependent hippocampal-neocortical connectivity during memory encoding and postencoding rest in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2010, 107(16):7550-7555.
25. Kim D., Pearlson G.D., Kiehl K.A., Bedrick E., Demirci O., Calhoun V.D. A method for multi-group inter-participant correlation: abnormal synchrony in patients with schizophrenia during auditory target detection. NeuroImage 2008, 39(3):1129-1141.
26. Lee T.-W., Josephs O., Dolan R.J., Critchley H.D. Imitating expressions: emotion-specific neural substrates in facial mimicry. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2006, 1(2):122-135.
27. Lowell S.Y., Poletto C.J., Knorr-Chung B.R., Reynolds R.C., Simonyan K., Ludlow C.L. Sensory stimulation activates both motor and sensory components of the swallowing system. NeuroImage 2008, 42(1):285-295.
28. Mayer J.S., Bittner R.A., Nikolić D., Bledowski C., Goebel R., Linden D.E.J. Common neural substrates for visual working memory and attention. NeuroImage 2007, 36(2):441-453.
29. Michelon P., Vettel J.M., Zacks J.M. Lateral somatotopic organization during imagined and prepared movements. Journal of Neurophysiology 2006, 95(2):811-822.
30. Mital P.K., Smith T.J., Hill R.L., Henderson J.M. Clustering of gaze during dynamic scene viewing is predicted by motion. Cognitive Computation 2010, 3(1):5-24.
31. Nichols T., Hayasaka S. Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2003, 12:419-446.
32. Nishimoto S., Vu A.T., Naselaris T., Benjamini Y., Yu B., Gallant J.L. Reconstructing visual experiences from brain activity evoked by natural movies. Current Biology: CB 2011, 21(19):1641-1646.
33. Nummenmaa L., Smirnov D., Lahnakoski J.M., Glerean E., Jaaskelainen I.P., Sams M., et al. Mental action simulation synchronizes action-observation circuits across individuals. Journal of Neuroscience 2014, 34(3):748-757.
34. Pajula J., Kauppi J.-P., Tohka J. Inter-subject correlation in fMRI: method validation against stimulus-model based analysis. PLoS One 2012, 8(8):e41196.
35. Petrini K., McAleer P., Neary C., Gillard J., Pollick F.E. Experience in judging intent to harm modulates parahippocampal activity: an fMRI study with experienced CCTV operators. Cortex 2014, 57:74-91.
36. Raghunathan T.E., Rosenthal R., Rubin D. Comparing correlated but nonoverlapping correlations. Psychological Methods 1996, 1:178-183.
37. Rajimehr R., Young J.C., Tootell R.B.H. An anterior temporal face patch in human cortex, predicted by macaque maps. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2009, 106(6):1995-2000.
38. Rizzolatti G., Sinigaglia C. The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 2010, 11(4):264-274.
39. Schwartze M., Rothermich K., Kotz S.A. Functional dissociation of pre-SMA and SMA-proper in temporal processing. NeuroImage 2012, 60(1):290-298.
40. Smith T.J. Watching you watch movies: using eye tracking to inform cognitive film theory. Psychocinematics: Exploring cognition at the movies 2014, 165-191. Oxford University Press, USA, New York. A.P. Shimamura (Ed.).
41. Smith T.J., Levin D., Cutting J.E. A window on reality: perceiving edited moving images. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2012, 21(2):107-113.
42. Talairach J., Tournoux P. Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain 1988, Thieme, New York.
43. Tsao D.Y., Moeller S., Freiwald W.A. Comparing face patch systems in macaques and humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2008, 105(49):19514-19519.
44. Wilson S.M., Molnar-Szakacs I., Iacoboni M. Beyond Superior temporal cortex: intersubject correlations in narrative speech comprehension. Cerebral Cortex 2007, 18(1):230-242.
45. Zacks J.M., Braver T.S., Sheridan M.A., Donaldson D.I., Snyder A.Z., Ollinger J.M., et al. Human brain activity time-locked to perceptual event boundaries. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4(6):651-655.