Prioritizing Feasible Locations for Permeable Pavement Using MODFLOW and Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods

Water Resources Management

Volumn 29, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 4539-4555

  Yang, Jeong Seok ^a   Son, Min Woo ^b   Chung, Eun Sung ^c   Kim, Il Hwan ^a  

^a Kookmin University   (South Korea)

^b Chungnam National University   (South Korea)

^c Seoul National University of Science and Technology   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Location prioritization; MODFLOW; Multi criteria decision making; Permeable pavement

Indexed keywords

GROUNDWATER; ITERATIVE METHODS; LOCATION; PAVEMENTS; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

ANTHROPOGENIC FACTORS; ECONOMIC FEASIBILITIES; FEASIBLE ALTERNATIVES; MODFLOW; MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS; PERMEABLE PAVEMENTS; PRIORITIZATION;

DECISION MAKING;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; FLOW MODELING; HYDROLOGICAL CYCLE; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; INSTREAM FLOW; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE; WATERSHED;

KOREA;

EID: 84939599362     PISSN: 09204741     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-015-1074-z     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ahmadisharaf E, Kalyanapu A, Chung ES (2015) Evaluating the effects of inundation duration and velocity on selection of flood management alternatives using multi-criteria decision making. Water Resour Manag 29(8):2543–2561
2. Bardossy A, Bogardi I (1983) Network design for the spatial estimation of environmental variables. Appl Math Comput 12:339–369
3. Bean EZ, Hunt WF, Bidelspach DA (2007) Evaluation of four permeable pavement sites in eastern North Carolina for runoff reduction and water quality impacts. J Irrig Drain Eng 133(6):583–592
4. Brattebo BO, Booth DB (2003) Long-term stormwater quantity and quality performance of permeable pavement systems. Water Res 37(18):4369–4376
5. Chung ES, Kim Y (2014) Development of fuzzy multi-criteria approach to prioritize locations of treated wastewater use considering climate change scenarios. J Environ Manag 146:505–516
6. Chung ES, Lee KS (2009) Prioritization of water management for sustainability using hydrologic simulation model and multicriteria decision making techniques. J Environ Manag 90(3):1502–1511
7. Chung ES, Hong WP, Lee KS, Burian SJ (2011) Integrated use of a continuous simulation model and multi-attribute decision making for ranking urban watershed management alternatives. Water Resour Manag 25(2):641–659
8. Chung ES, Won GJ, Kim Y, Lee H (2015) Water resources vulnerability characteristics by population size in a changing climate using subjective and objective weights. Sustainability 6(9):6141–6157
9. Damodaram C, Zechman E (2013) Simulation-optimization approach to design low impact development for managing peak flow alterations in urbanizing watersheds. J Water Resour Plan Manag 139(3):290–298
10. Davis AP (2005) Green engineering principles promote low impact development. Environ Sci Technol 39(16):338A–344A
11. Doherty J, Brebber L, Whyte P (1994) PEST-Model-independent parameter estimation. User’s manual. Watermark Computing, Australia
12. Fassman EA, Blackbourn S (2010) Urban runoff mitigation by a permeable pavement system over impermeable soils. J Hydrol Eng 15(6):475–485
13. Goicoechea A, Hansen DR, Duckstein L (1982) Multiobjective decision analysis with engineering and business applications. Wiley, New York
14. González-Angullo N, Castro D, Rodriguez-Hernández J, Davies JW (2008) Runoff infiltration to permeable paving in clogged conditions. Urban Water J 5(2):117–124
15. Harbaugh AW (2005) MODFLOW-2005, the U.S. Geological Survey Modular Ground-Water Model-the Ground-Water Flow process. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Method 6-A16
16. Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications. Springer, Heidelberg
17. Kang BS, Lee JH, Chung ES, Kim DS, Kim YD (2013) A sensitivity analysis approach of multi-attribute decision making technique to rank flood mitigation projects. KSCE J Civ Eng 17(6):1529–1539
18. Kim Y, Chung ES (2014) An index-based robust decision making framework for watershed management in a changing climate. Sci Total Environ 473–474:88–102
19. Kim Y, Chung ES (2015) Robust prioritization of climate change adaptation strategies using the VIKOR method with objective weights. J Am Water Resour Assoc 1–16. doi:10.1111/jawr.12291
20. Kim Y, Chung ES, Jeon S, Kim SU (2013) Prioritizing the best sites for treated wastewater use in an urban watershed using Fuzzy TOPSIS. Resour Conserv Recycl 73:23–32
21. Kim Y, Chung ES, Jun SM (2014) Iterative framework for robust reclaimed wastewater allocation in a changing environment using multi-criteria decision making. Water Resour Manag 29(2):295–311
22. Line DE, White NM, Osmond DL, Jennings GD, Mojonnier CB (2002) Pollutant export from various land uses in the upper Neuse River Basin. Water Environ Res 74(1):100–108
23. Linstone HA, Turoff M (1975) The Delphi method: techniques and application. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Advanced Book Program
24. McDaniels TL, Gregory RS, Fields D (1999) Democratizing risk management: successful public involvement in local water management decisions. Risk Anal 19:497–510
25. Sung CY, Kim YI (2012) Experimental study on rainfall runoff reduction effects by permeable polymer block pavement. J Kor Soc Agric Eng 54(2):157–166 (in Korean)
26. Waterloo (2004) Visual MODFLOW Pro user’s manual: the industry standard for 3D groundwater flow and contaminant transport modelling. [S.l.]: Waterloo Hydrogeologic, Print
27. WinPest (1999) User’s manual: non-linear parameter estimation and predictive analysis program. [S.l.]: Watermark Numerical Computing & Waterloo Hydrogeologic, Print
28. Yang JS, Kim SU, Chung ES, Kim TW (2012) Prioritization of water management under climate change and urbanization using multi-criteria decision making methods. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16(3):801–814