An index-based robust decision making framework for watershed management in a changing climate

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 473-474, Issue , 2014, Pages 88-102

  Kim, Yeonjoo ^a   Chung, Eun Sung ^b  

^a Korea Environment Institute (KEI)   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University of Science and Technology   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Climate change; Index based robust decision making; Multi criteria decision analysis; Watershed management

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; DETERIORATION; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; RUNOFF; SOIL CONSERVATION; STREAM FLOW; WATER CONSERVATION; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHEDS;

CLIMATE CHANGE SCENARIOS; DECISION-MAKING STRATEGIES; HYDROLOGIC SIMULATION MODEL; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS; ROBUST DECISIONS; WATER QUALITY DETERIORATION; WATERSHED MANAGEMENT; WATERSHED MANAGEMENT TOOLS;

QUALITY CONTROL;

CLIMATE CHANGE; DECISION MAKING; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; POLICY APPROACH; STREAMFLOW; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER PLANNING; WATER QUALITY; WATER RESOURCE; WATERSHED;

ARTICLE; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HYDROLOGY; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; POTENTIAL STREAMFLOW DEPLETION; POTENTIAL WATER QUALITY DETERIORATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUALITY CONTROL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOUTH KOREA; STANDARDIZATION; URBAN AREA; WATER QUALITY; WATER SUPPLY; WATERSHED MANAGEMENT;

KOREA;

CLIMATE CHANGE; INDEX-BASED ROBUST DECISION MAKING; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS; WATERSHED MANAGEMENT;

CLIMATE CHANGE; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DECISION MAKING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; UNCERTAINTY; WATER RESOURCES; WATER SUPPLY;

EID: 84890863739     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Chu T.C. Selecting plant location via a fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Int J Manuf Technol Manag 2002, 20:859-864.
2. Chung E.S., Lee K.S. Prioritization of water management for sustainability using hydrologic simulation model and multicriteria decision making techniques. J Environ Manage 2009, 90:1502-1511.
3. Chung E.S., Lee K.S. Identification of spatial ranking of hydrological vulnerability using multi-criteria decision making techniques: Case study of Korea. J Water Resour Manag 2009, 23:2395-2416.
4. Chung E.S., Lee K.S. A social-economic-engineering combined framework for decision making in water resource planning. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 2009, 13:675-686.
5. Chung E.S., Hong W.P., Lee K.S., Burian S.J. Integrated use of a continuous simulation model and multi-attribute decision making for ranking urban watershed management alternatives. J Water Resour Manag 2011, 25:641-659.
6. Chung E.S., Kim K.T., Lee K.S., Burian S.J. Incorporating uncertainty and objective load reduction allocation into the TMDL process in Korea. KSCE J Civ Eng 2011, 15:1289-1297.
7. Chung E.S., Park K., Lee K.S. The relative impacts of climate change and urbanization on the hydrological response of a Korean urban watershed. Hydrol Process 2011, 25:544-560.
8. Dessai S., Lu X., Risbey J.S. On the role of climate scenarios for adaptation planning. Glob Environ Chang 2005, 15:87-97.
9. Dooley J.J., Calvin K.V. Temporal and spatial deployment of Carbon Dioxide capture and storage technologies across the Representative Concentration Pathways. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:5845-5852.
10. Economic and Social Commission for Asia the Pacific (ESCAP) Guidelines on Strategic Planning and Management of Water Resources 2004, United Nations, New York.
11. Edwards C., Miller M. PLOAD Version 3.0 User's Manual 2001, USEPA.
12. Giri S., Nejadhashemi A.P., Wonzicki S.A. Evaluating of targeting methods for implementation of best management practices in the Saginaw River Watershed. J Environ Manage 2012, 103:24-40.
13. Heathcote I.W. Integrated Watershed Management 1998, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
14. Hwang C.L., Yoon K. Multiple Attributes Decision Making Methods and Applications 1981, Springer, Heidelberg.
15. Hyundai Engineering Corporation Integrated Flood Control Plan for the Anyangcheon Watershed 2003, Ministry of Construction and Transportation of Korea.
16. Jago-on K.A.B., Kaneko S., Fujikura R., Fujiwara A., Imai T., Matsomoto T., et al. Urbanization and subsurface environmental issues: An attempt at DPSIR model application in Asian cities. Sci Total Environ 2009, 407:3089-3104.
17. Jun K.S., Sung J.Y., Chung E.S., Lee K.S. Development of spatial water resources vulnerability index considering climate change impacts. Sci Total Environ 2011, 409:5228-5242.
18. Kim Y., Chung E.S. Integrated assessment of climate change and urbanization impact on adaptation strategies: A case study in two small Korean watersheds. Clim Change 2012, 115:853-872.
19. Korea Institute of Construction Technology (KICT) Development and Application of Method to Determine Instreamflow Requirement 1995, Korea Water Resources Corporation.
20. Lee K.S., Chung E.S. Development of integrated watershed management schemes for intensively urbanized region in Korea. J Hydro Environ Res 2007, 1:95-109.
21. Lee K.S., Chung E.S., Kim Y.O. Integrated watershed management for mitigating streamflow depletion in an urbanized watershed in Korea. Phys Chem Earth 2008, 33:382-394.
22. Lempert R.J., Schlesinger M.E. Robust strategies for abating climate change. Clim Chang 2000, 45(3):387-401.
23. Levy J.K., Hipel K.W., Kilgour M.D. Using environmental indicators to quantify robustness of policy alternatives to uncertainty. Ecol Model 2000, 130:79-86.
24. Loomes G., Sugden R. Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. The Economic Journal 1982, 92(368):805-824.
25. Parson E.S., Burkett V., Fischer-Vanden K., Keith D., Mearns L., Pitcher H., et al. Global-Change Scenarios: Their Development and Use. Synthesis and Assessment Product 2.1b 2006, US Climate Change Science Program.
26. Scheraga J.D., Grambsch A.E. Risks, opportunities, and adaptation to climate change. Climate Res 1998, 11:85-95.
27. Schultink G. Critical environmental indicators: Performance indices and assessment models for sustainable rural development planning. Ecol Model 2000, 130:47-58.
28. Smeets E., Weterings R. Environmental indicators: Typology and overview 1999, European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark.
29. Spangenberg J.H., Phahl S., Deller K. Towards indicators for institutional sustainability: Lessons from an analysis of Agenda 21. Ecol Indic 2002, 2:61-77.
30. Stevenson W., Ozgur C. Introduction to Management Science with Spreadsheets and Student CD 2007, McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
31. Stewart T., Scott L. A scenario-based framework for multicriteria decision analysis in water resources planning. Water Resour Res 1995, 31:2835-2843.
32. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(OECD) OECD core set of indicators for environmental performance reviews. Environment Monographs 1993, 83. [Paris].
33. U.S.Geological Survey (USGS) PHABSIM for Windows, User Manual and Exercises 2001, Midcontinent ecological science center, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
34. Vogel R.M., Kroll C.N. Regional geohydrologic-geomorphic relationships for the estimation of low-flow statistics. Water Resour Res 1992, 28:2451-2458.
35. Walesh S.G. Urban Surface Water Management 1989, John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.