Scoring system to predict pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A UK multicenter study

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 261, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1191-1197

  Roberts, Keith J ^a   Sutcliffe, Robert P ^a   Marudanayagam, Ravi ^a   Hodson, James ^a   Isaac, John ^a   Muiesan, Paolo ^a   Navarro, Alex ^a   Patel, Krashna ^b   Jah, Asif ^b   Napetti, Sara ^c   Adair, Anya ^c   Lazaridis, Stefanos ^d   Prachalias, Andreas ^d   Shingler, Guy ^e   Al Sarireh, Bilal ^e   Storey, Roland ^f   Smith, Andrew M ^f   Shah, Nehal ^g   Fusai, Guiseppe ^g   Ahmed, Jamil ^h   Hilal, Mohammad Abu ^h   Mirza, Darius F ^a   more..

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS BIRMINGHAM NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c ROYAL INFIRMARY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^d KING S COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e MORRISTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^f ST JAMES S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^g ROYAL FREE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^h UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SOUTHAMPTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Pancreatic fistula; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Predictive score

Indexed keywords

ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE; ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; BILIRUBIN; AMYLASE;

ADULT; AGED; ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE BLOOD LEVEL; ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE BLOOD LEVEL; ARTICLE; BILIRUBIN BLOOD LEVEL; BODY MASS; CANCER STAGING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PANCREAS FISTULA; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PANCREATICOJEJUNOSTOMY; PERIRENAL FAT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PANCREATIC FISTULA; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; UNITED KINGDOM; BILE DUCT CARCINOMA; BIOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR; PANCREATIC DUCT; PANCREATIC DUCTAL CARCINOMA; PANCREATITIS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SMOKING HABIT; VATER PAPILLA CARCINOMA; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; DUODENAL DISEASES; GREAT BRITAIN; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC DISEASES; PANCREATIC FISTULA; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROGNOSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; VALIDATION STUDY;

AGED; COHORT STUDIES; DUODENAL DISEASES; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC DISEASES; PANCREATIC FISTULA; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROGNOSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84939569510     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000997     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Balzano G, Zerbi A, Capretti G, et al. Effect of hospital volume on outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy in Italy. Br J Surg. 2008;95:357-362.
2. de Wilde RF, Besselink MG, van der Tweet I, et al. Impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortality. Br J Surg. 2012;99:404-410.
3. Schmidt CM, Turrini O, Parikh P, et al. Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-institution experience. Arch Surg. 2010;145:634-640.
4. van Heek NT, Kuhlmann KF, Scholten RJ, et al. Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic reviewand an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands. Ann Surg. 2005;242:781-788, discussion 788-790.
5. Aroori S, Puneet P, Bramhall SR, et al. Outcomes comparing a pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) and a pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) after a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). HPB (Oxford). 2011;13:723-731.
6. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgerys. 2005;138: 8-13.
7. Gaujoux S, Cortes A, Couvelard A, et al. Fatty pancreas and increased body mass index are risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery. 2010;148:15-23.
8. House MG, Fong Y, Arnaoutakis DJ, et al. Preoperative predictors for complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: impact of BMI and body fat distribution. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:270-278.
9. Lermite E, Pessaux P, Brehant O, et al. Risk factors of pancreatic fistula and delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:588-596.
10. Lin JW, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ, et al. Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8:951-959.
11. Mathur A, Pitt HA, Marine M, et al. Fatty pancreas: a factor in postoperative pancreatic fistula. Ann Surg. 2007;246:1058-1064.
12. Pratt WB, Callery MP, Vollmer CM, Jr. Risk prediction for development of pancreatic fistula using the ISGPF classification scheme. World J Surg. 2008;32:419-428.
13. Roberts KJ, Storey R, Hodson J, et al. Pre-operative prediction of pancreatic fistula: is it possible? Pancreatology. 2013;13:423-428.
14. Rosso E, Casnedi S, Pessaux P, et al. The role of "fatty pancreas" and of BMI in the occurrence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:1845-1851.
15. Yang YM, Tian XD, Zhuang Y, et al. Risk factors of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:2456-2461.
16. Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS, et al. A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216:1-14.
17. Yamamoto Y, Sakamoto Y, Nara S, et al. A preoperative predictive scoring system for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg. 2011;35:2747-2755.
18. Roberts KJ, Hodson J, Mehrzad H, et al. Apreoperative predictive score of pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2014;16:620-628.
19. Diener MK, Fitzmaurice C, Schwarzer G, et al. Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;5:CD006053.
20. Diener MK, Tadjalli-Mehr K, Wente MN, et al. Risk-benefit assessment of closed intra-abdominal drains after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the current state of evidence. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011;396:41-52.
21. Connor S, Alexakis N, Garden OJ, et al. Meta-analysis of the value of somatostatin and its analogues in reducing complications associated with pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1059-1067.
22. Gurusamy KS, Koti R, Fusai G, et al. Somatostatin analogues for pancreatic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;4:CD008370.
23. Figueras J, Sabater L, Planellas P, et al. Randomized clinical trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy on the rate and severity of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1597-1605.
24. Sutcliffe RP, Kumar S, Bramhall SR, et al. Safety and efficacy of a targeted enhanced recovery pathway after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2013;100:7.