Erratum: Risk-benefit assessment of closed intra-abdominal drains after pancreatic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the current state of evidence (Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery (2011) 396 (41-52) DOI: 10.1007/s00423-010-0716-0);Risk-benefit assessment of closed intra-abdominal drains after pancreatic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the current state of evidence

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

Volumn 396, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 41-52

  Diener, Markus K ^a   Mehr, Keyvan Tadjalli ^a   Wente, Moritz N ^a   Kieser, Meinhard ^a   Büchler, Markus W ^a   Seiler, Christoph M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Drains; Meta analysis; Pancreatic surgery; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL ABSCESS; ABDOMINAL DRAINAGE; BIOSIS; COCHRANE LIBRARY; DEVICE REMOVAL; EMBASE; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; MORBIDITY; PANCREAS FISTULA; PANCREAS SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; REVIEW; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SURGICAL DRAINAGE; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TIME;

EID: 78650960692     PISSN: 14352443     EISSN: 14352451     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-011-0773-z     Document Type: Erratum

References (18)

1. JO Robinson 1986 Surgical drainage: an historical perspective Br J Surg 73 422 426 1:STN:280:DyaL283ktl2qsQ%3D%3D 10.1002/bjs.1800730603 3521783
2. FE Dominguez S Post 2003 Abdominal drainages Chirurg 74 91 98 10.1007/s00104-002-0586-2 (Pubitemid 38270208)
3. H Petrowsky N Demartines V Rousson PA Clavien 2004 Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analyses Ann Surg 240 1074 1084 10.1097/01.sla.0000146149.17411.c5 15570212 (Pubitemid 39602134)
4. SH Dougherty RL Simmons 1992 The biology and practice of surgical drains. Part II Curr Probl Surg 29 633 730 1:STN:280:DyaK3s%2FkvVWiug%3D%3D 1424760
5. M Schein 2008 To drain or not to drain? The role of drainage in the contaminated and infected abdomen: an international and personal perspective World J Surg 32 312 321 10.1007/s00268-007-9277-y 18080709
6. MJ Heslin LE Harrison AD Brooks SN Hochwald DG Coit MF Brennan 1998 Is intra-abdominal drainage necessary after pancreaticoduodenectomy? J Gastrointest Surg 2 373 378 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FlvF2rsw%3D%3D 10.1016/S1091-255X(98)80077-2 9841995
7. KC Conlon D Labow D Leung A Smith W Jarnagin DG Coit, et al. 2001 Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection Ann Surg 234 487 493 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrisFCqtw%3D%3D 10.1097/00000658-200110000-00008 11573042 (Pubitemid 32946711)
8. M Kawai M Tani H Terasawa S Ina S Hirono R Nishioka, et al. 2006 Early removal of prophylactic drains reduces the risk of intra-abdominal infections in patients with pancreatic head resection: prospective study for 104 consecutive patients Ann Surg 244 1 7 10.1097/01.sla.0000218077.14035.a6 16794381 (Pubitemid 44297440)
9. C Bassi E Molinari G Malleo S Grippa G Butturini R Salvia, et al. 2010 Early versus late drain removal after standard pancreatic resections-results of a prospective randomized trial Ann Surg 252 207 214 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e61e88 20622661
10. MW Büchler H Friess 2006 Evidence forward, drainage on retreat: still we ignore and drain!? Ann Surg 244 8 9 10.1097/01.sla.0000225046.43968.eb 16794382 (Pubitemid 44297441)
11. A Liberati DG Altman J Tetzlaff C Mulrow PC Gøtzsche JP Ioannidis, et al. 2009 The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration PLoS Med 6 e1000100 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 19621070
12. Higgins JPT, Green S (2008) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley, Chichester
13. SH Downs N Black 1998 The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions J Epidemiol Community Health 52 377 384 1:STN:280:DyaK1cvjs1Omsg%3D%3D 10.1136/jech.52.6.377 9764259
14. The Nordic Cochrane Centre (2008) Review Manager (RevMan) Version 5.0 The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen
15. R DerSimonian N Laird 1986 Meta-analysis in clinical trials Control Clin Trials 7 177 188 1:STN:280:DyaL2s7gsVamtA%3D%3D 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 3802833 (Pubitemid 17189972)
16. JP Higgins SG Thompson JJ Deeks DG Altman 2003 Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses BMJ 327 557 560 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 12958120
17. MJ Heslin L Latkany D Leung AD Brooks SN Hochwald PW Pisters, et al. 1997 A prospective, randomized trial of early enteral feeding after resection of upper gastrointestinal malignancy Ann Surg 226 567 577 1:STN:280: DyaK1c%2Fht1Srug%3D%3D 10.1097/00000658-199710000-00016 9351723 (Pubitemid 28049677)
18. C Bassi C Dervenis G Butturini A Fingerhut C Yeo J Izbicki, et al. 2005 International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition Surgery 138 8 13 10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001 16003309 (Pubitemid 40933766)