Does particle size of clinoptilolite zeolite have a role in textural properties? Insight through differential pore-volume distribution of barret, joyner, and halenda model

Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Volumn 46, Issue 16, 2015, Pages 2070-2078

  Ramesh, K ^a   Reddy, K Sammi ^b   Rashmi, I ^a   Biswas, A K ^a   Islam, K R ^c  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SOIL SCIENCE   (India)

^b CENTRAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR DRYLAND AGRICULTURE   (India)

^c OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adsorption; Desorption; Mesopores; Micropores; Texture

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION; CLINOPTILOLITE; DESORPTION; ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING; HYSTERESIS; MACROPORE; PARTICLE SIZE; SOIL TEXTURE;

EID: 84939547836     PISSN: 00103624     EISSN: 15322416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00103624.2015.1069312     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Barrett, E. P., L. G. Joyner, and P. P. Halenda. 1951. The determination of pore volume and area distributions in porous substances, I: Computations from nitrogen isotherms. Journal of the American Chemical Society 73:373-80. doi:10.1021/ja01145a126.
2. Blanchard, G., M. Maunaye, and G. Martin. 1984. Removal of heavy metals from waters by means of natural zeolites. Water Research 18 (12): 1501-7. doi:10.1016/0043-1354(84)90124-6.
3. Cui, H., L. Y. Li, and J. R. Grace. 2006. Exploration of remediation of acid rock drainage with clinoptilolite as sorbent in a slurry bubble column for both heavy metal capture and regeneration. Water Research 40 (18): 3359-66. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2006.07.028.
4. Dyer, A., and K. J. White. 1999. Cation diffusion in the natural zeolite clinoptilolite. Thermochimica Acta 340-341:341-48. doi:10.1016/S0040-6031(99)00280-4.
5. Evans, R., U. M. B. Marconi, and P. Tarazona. 1986. Capillary condensation and adsorption in cylindrical and slit-like pores. Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions 2 82 (10): 1763-87. doi:10.1039/f29868201763.
6. Ferguson, G. A., and I. L. Pepper. 1987. Ammonium retention in sand amended with clinoptilolite. Soil Science Society of America Journal 51 (1): 231-34. doi:10.2136/ sssaj1987.03615995005100010047x.
7. Harvey, R. B., L. F. Kubena, M. H. Elissalde, and T. D. Phillips. 1993. Efficacy of zeolitic ore compounds on the toxicity of aflatoxin to growing broiler chickens. Avian Diseases 37:67-73. doi:10.2307/1591459.
8. Huang, Z. T., and A. M. Petrovic. 1994. Physical properties of sand as affected by clinoptilolite zeolite particle size and quantity. Journal of Turfgrass Management 1 (1): 1-15. doi:10.1300/ J099v01n01_01.
9. Inglezakis, V. J., N. A. Diamandis, M. D. Loizidou, and H. P. Grigoropoulou. 1999. Effect of pore clogging on kinetics of lead uptake by clinoptilolite. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 215 (1): 54-57. doi:10.1006/jcis.1999.6247.
10. Jena, A., and K. Gupta. 2003. Liquid extrusion techniques for pore structure evaluation of nonwovens. International Nonwovens Journal Fall:45-53.
11. Kesraoui-Ouki, S., C. Cheeseman, and R. Perry. 1993. Effects of conditioning and treatment of chabazite and clinoptilolite prior to lead and cadmium removal. Environmental Science and Technology 27 (6): 1108-16. doi:10.1021/es00043a009.
12. Kilincarslan, A., and S. Akyil. 2005. Uranium adsorption characteristic and thermodynamic behavior of clinoptilolite zeolite. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 264 (3): 541-48. doi:10.1007/s10967-005-0750-5.
13. Langwaldt, J. 2008. Ammonium removal from water by eight natural zeolites: A comparative study. Separation Science and Technology 43:2166-82. doi:10.1080/01496390802063937.
14. Medvidović, N. V., J. Perić, and M. Trgo. 2006. Column performance in lead removal from aqueous solutions by fixed bed of natural zeolite-clinoptilolite. Separation and Purification Technology 49 (3): 237-44. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2005.10.005.
15. Murcia, A. B. 2013. Ordered porous nanomaterials: The merit of small. ISRN Nanotechnology 2013:29.
16. Nguyen, M. L., and C. C. Tanner. 1998. Ammonium removal from wastewaters using natural New Zealand zeolites. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 41 (3): 427-46. doi:10.1080/ 00288233.1998.9513328.
17. Ortega, E. A., C. Cheeseman, J. Knight, and M. Loizidou. 2000. Properties of alkali-activated clinoptilolite. Cement and Concrete Research 30 (10): 1641-46. doi:10.1016/S0008-8846(00) 00331-8.
18. Panpranot, J., U. Toophorm, and P. Praserthdam. 2005. Effect of particle-size on the hydrothermal stability and catalytic activity of polycrystalline beta zeolite. Journal of Porous Materials 12:293-99. doi:10.1007/s10934-005-3127-9.
19. Park, J., S. Lee, J. Lee, and C. Lee. 2002. Lab-scale experiments for permeable reactive barriers against contaminated groundwater with ammonium and heavy metals using clinoptilolite (01-29B). Journal of Hazardous Materials 95 (1-2): 65-79. doi:10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00007-9.
20. Ramesh, K., A. K. Biswas, and A. K. Patra. 2015. Zeolitic farming. Indian Journal of Agronomy 60 (2): 50-56.
21. Ramesh, K., A. K. Biswas, J. Somasundaram, and A. S. Rao. 2010. Nanoporous zeolites in farming: Current status and issues ahead. Current Science 99:760-65.
22. Ramesh, K., D. Damodar Reddy, A. K. Biswas, and A. S. Rao. 2011. Zeolites and their potential uses in agriculture. Advances in Agronomy 113:215-36.
23. Ramesh, K., K. S. Reddy, I. Rashmi, and A. K. Biswas. 2014a. Porosity distribution, surface area, and morphology of synthetic potassium zeolites: A SEM and N2 adsorption study. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 45 (16): 2171-81. doi:10.1080/ 00103624.2014.929699.
24. Ramesh, K., K. S. Reddy, I. Rashmi, and A. K. Biswas. 2014b. Nanostructured natural zeolite: Surface area, meso-pore, and volume distribution, and morphology. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 45 (22): 2878-97. doi:10.1080/00103624.2014.956934.
25. Ramesh, K., K. S. Reddy, I. Rashmi, A. K. Biswas, and A. S. Rao. 2015. Crystal morphology and differential meso-micro pore-volume distribution patterns of clinoptilolite fractions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences 85 (1):85-91. doi:10.1007/s40011-014-0319-6.
26. Semmens, M. J., J. T. Wang, and A. C. Booth. 1977. Biological regeneration of ammonium-saturated clinoptilolite, II: Mechanism of regeneration and influence of salt concentration. Environmental Science and Technology 11 (3): 260-65. doi:10.1021/es60126a014.
27. Sullivan, E. J., D. B. Hunter, and R. S. Bowman. 1997. Topological and thermal properties of surfactant-modified clinoptilolite studied by tapping-mode atomic force microscopy and highresolution thermogravimetric analysis. Clays and Clay Minerals 45 (1): 42-53. doi:10.1346/ CCMN.1997.0450105.
28. Tsitsishvili, G. V., T. G. Andronikashvili, G. N. Kirov, and L. Filizova. 1992. Natural zeolites. New York: Ellis Horwood.
29. Wang, Y., S. Liu, Z. Xu, T. Han, S. Chuan, and T. Zhu. 2006. Ammonia removal from leachate solution using natural Chinese clinoptilolite. Journal of Hazardous Materials 136 (3): 735-40. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.01.002.
30. Wen, D., Y.-S. Ho, S. Xie, and X. Tang. 2006. Mechanism of the adsorption of ammonium ions from aqueous solution by a Chinese natural zeolite. Separation Science and Technology 41:3485-98. doi:10.1080/01496390600854636.