Sex effects on short-term complications after hip fracture: A prospective cohort study

Clinical Interventions in Aging

Volumn 10, Issue , 2015, Pages 1259-1266

  Ekström, Wilhelmina ^a   Samuelsson, Bodil ^b   Ponzer, Sari ^c   Cederholm, Tommy ^d,e   Thorngren, Karl Göran ^f   Hedström, Margareta ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b DANDERYD HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^c KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^d UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^e UPPSALA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^f LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Associated factors; Complications; Hip fracture; Male sex

Indexed keywords

ACUTE KIDNEY FAILURE; AGED; ANESTHESIST; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DECUBITUS; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; HEALTH STATUS; HEART DISEASE; HEART INFARCTION; HIP FRACTURE; HUMAN; LUNG DISEASE; LUNG EMBOLISM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; MENTAL HEALTH; MORTALITY; PNEUMONIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEX DIFFERENCE; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; WOUND INFECTION; COGNITION; HIP FRACTURES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RISK FACTOR; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COGNITION; COMORBIDITY; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HIP FRACTURES; HUMANS; MALE; PNEUMONIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 84939532389     PISSN: 11769092     EISSN: 11781998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S80100     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Thorngren KG, Hommel A, Norrman PO, Thorngren J, Wingstrand H. Epidemiology of femoral neck fractures. Injury. 2002;(33 Suppl 3):C1–C7.
2. Löfgren S, Ljunggren G, Brommels M. No ticking time bomb: hospital utilisation of 28,528 hip fracture patients in Stockholm during 1998–2007. Scand J Public Health. 2010;38(4):418–425.
3. Hedström M, Gröndal L, Ahl T. Urinary tract infection in patients with hip fractures. Injury. 1999;30(5):341–343.
4. Giusti A, Barone A, Razzano M, Pizzonia M, Olivieri M, Pioli G. Predictors of hospital readmission in a cohort of 236 elderly discharged after surgical repair of hip fracture: one-year follow-up. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2008;20(3):253–259.
5. Merchant RA, Lui KL, Ismail NH, Wong HP, Sitoh YY. The relationship between postoperative complications and outcomes after hip fracture surgery. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2005;34(2):163–168.
6. Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L. Increased mortality in patients with a hip fracture-effect of pre-morbid conditions and post-fracture complications. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18(12):1583–1593.
7. Wehren LE, Hawkes WG, Orwig DL, Hebel JR, Zimmerman SI, Magaziner J. Gender differences in mortality after hip fracture: the role of infection. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18(12):2231–2237.
8. Panula J, Pihlajamäki H, Mattila V, et al. Mortality and cause of death in hip fracture patients aged 65 or older. A population based study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:105.
9. Endo Y, Aharonoff GB, Zuckerman JD, Egol KA, Koval KJ. Gender differences in patients with hip fracture: a greater risk of morbidity and mortality in men. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19(1):29–35.
10. Samuelsson B, Hedström M, Ponzer S, et al. Gender differences and cognitive aspects on functional outcome after a hip fracture-a 2 years follow up study of 2,134 patients. Age Ageing. 2009;38(6):686–692.
11. Söderqvist A, Ekström W, Ponzer S, et al. Prediction of mortality in elderly patients with hip fractures: a two-year prospective study of 1,944 patients. Gerontology. 2009;55(5):496–504.
12. Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Socialstyrelsens riktlinjer för vård och behandling av höftfraktur. Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare; 2003. Swedish.
13. Parker MJ, Currie CT, Thorngren KG. Standardised audit of hip fractures in Europe. Hip Int. 1998;8:10–15.
14. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA. 1963;185:914–919.
15. Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL Jr. ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology. 1978;49(4):239–243.
16. Pfeiffer E. A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1975;23(10):433–441.
17. European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Pressure Ulcer Prevention/Treatment Guidelines. Oxford, UK: EUPAP; 1999. Available from: http://www.npuap.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Updated-10-16-14-Quick-Reference-Guide-DIGITAL-NPUAP-EPUAP-PPPIA-16Oct2014.pdf. Accessed June 5, 2015.
18. Söderqvist A, Strömberg L, Ponzer S, Tidermark J. Documenting the cognitive status of hip fracture patients using the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire. J Clin Nurs. 2006;15(3):308–314.
19. Stromberg L, Lindgren U, Nordin C, Ohlén G, Svensson O. The appearance and disappearance of cognitive impairment in elderly patients during treatment for hip fracture. Scand J Caring Sci. 1997;11(3):167–175.
20. Chatterton BD, Moores TS, Ahmad S, Cattell A, Roberts PJ. Cause of death and factors associated with early in-hospital mortality after hip fracture. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B(2):246–251.
21. Boereboom FT, Raymakers JA, Duursma SA. Mortality and causes of death after hip fractures in The Netherlands. Neth J Med. 1992;41(1–2):4–10.
22. Roche JJ, Wenn RT, Sahota O, Moran CG. Effect of comorbidities and postoperative complications on mortality after hip fracture in elderly people: prospective observational cohort study. BMJ. 2005;331(7529):1374.
23. Youm T, Aharonoff G, Zuckerman JD, Koval KJ. Effect of previous cerebrovascular accident on outcome after hip fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14(5):329–334.
24. Pedersen SJ, Borgbjerg FM, Schousboe B, et al. A comprehensive hip fracture program reduces complication rates and mortality. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(10):1831–1838.
25. Kamel HK. The frequency and factors linked to a urinary tract infection coding in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2005;6(5):316.
26. Norris R, Parker M. Diabetes mellitus and hip fracture: a study of 5,966 cases. Injury. 2011;42(11):1313–1316.
27. Lindholm C, Sterner E, Romanelli M, et al. Hip fracture and pressure ulcers – the Pan-European Pressure Ulcer Study – intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors. Int Wound. 2008;5(2):315–328.
28. Hommel A, Ulander K, Björkelund KB, Norrman PO, Wingstrand H, Thorngren KG. Influence of optimised treatment of people with hip fracture on time to operation, length of hospital stay, reoperations and mortality within 1 year. Injury. 2008;39(10):1164–1174.
29. Al-Ani AN, Samuelsson B, Tidermark J, et al. Early operation on patients with a hip fracture improved the ability to return to independent living. A prospective study of patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(7):1436–1442.
30. Khan SK, Kalra S, Khanna A, Thiruvengada MM, Parker MJ. Timing of surgery for hip fractures: a systematic review of 52 published studies involving 291,413 patients. Injury. 2009;40(7):692–697.
31. Nicholas JA. Preoperative optimization and risk assessment. Clin Geriatr Med. 2014;30(2):207–218.
32. Hapuarachchi KS, Ahluwalia RS, Bowditch MG. Neck of femur fractures in the over 90s: a select group of patients who require prompt surgical intervention for optimal results. J Orthop Traumatol. 2014;15(1):13–19.