Who loses? Tracking ecosystem service redistribution from road development and mitigation in the Peruvian Amazon

Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 309-315

  Mandle, Lisa ^a   Tallis, Heather ^b   Sotomayor, Leonardo ^c   Vogl, Adrian L ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c THE NATURE CONSERVANCY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENT PROJECT; DRINKING WATER; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; INDIGENOUS POPULATION; NATURE-SOCIETY RELATIONS; NITROGEN; PHOSPHORUS; PRIORITIZATION; ROAD CONSTRUCTION; WATER QUALITY;

AMAZONIA; PERU;

EID: 84939497110     PISSN: 15409295     EISSN: 15409309     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/140337     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. BenDor T, Brozović N, and Pallathucheril VG. 2007. Assessing the socioeconomic impacts of wetland mitigation in the Chicago region. J Am Plann Assoc 73: 263-82.
2. Bhagabati NK, Ricketts T, Sulistyawan TBS, et al. 2014. Ecosystem services reinforce Sumatran tiger conservation in land use plans. Biol Conserv 169: 147-56.
3. Dobbs R, Pohl H, Lin D-Y, et al. 2013. Infrastructure productivity: how to save $1 trillion a year. Seoul, South Korea: McKinsey Global Institute.
4. Dulac J. 2013. Global land transport infrastructure requirements. Paris, France: Agency IE.
5. Geneletti D. 2013. Assessing the impact of alternative land-use zoning policies on future ecosystem services. Environ Impact Assess Rev 40: 25-35.
6. Josse C, Navarro G, Encarnación F, et al. 2007. Ecological systems of the Amazon Basin of Peru and Bolivia. Classification and mapping. Arlington, VA: NatureServe.
7. King DM and Herbert LW. 1997. The fungibility of wetlands. National Wetlands Newsletter 19: 10-13.
8. MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
9. Madsen B, Carroll N, Kandy D, and Bennett G. 2011. Update: state of biodiversity markets. Washington, DC: Forest Trends.
10. Maron M, Hobbs RJ, Moilanen A, et al. 2012. Faustian bargains? Restoration realities in the context of biodiversity offset policies. Biol Conserv 155: 141-48.
11. Naidoo R, Balmford A, Costanza R, et al. 2008. Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. P Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 9495-500.
12. Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, et al. 2009. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ 7: 4-11.
13. O'Rourke D and Connolly S. 2003. Just oil? The distribution of environmental and social impacts of oil production and consumption. Annu Rev Env Resour 28: 587-617.
14. Porro R, Lopez-Feldman A, and Vela-Alvardo J W. 2015. Forest use and agriculture in Ucayali, Peru: livelihood strategies, poverty and wealth in an Amazon frontier. Forest Policy Econ 51: 47-56.
15. Quétier F and Lavorel S. 2011. Assessing ecological equivalence in biodiversity offset schemes: key issues and solutions. Biol Conserv 144: 2991-99.
16. Reed MG and George C. 2011. Where in the world is environmental justice? Prog Hum Geogr 35: 835-42.
17. Robertson M, BenDor TK, Lave R, et al. 2014. Stacking ecosystem services. Front Ecol Environ 12: 186-93.
18. Ruhl JB and Salzman J. 2006. The effects of wetland mitigation banking on people. National Wetlands Newsletter 28: 1.
19. Tallis H, Polasky S, Lozano JS, et al. 2012. Inclusive wealth accounting for regulating ecosystem services. In: Inclusive wealth report 2012: measuring progress toward sustainability. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Tallis HT, Ricketts T, Guerry AD, et al. 2011. InVEST 2.4.4 user's guide: integrated valuation of environmental services and tradeoffs. Stanford, CA: Natural Capital Project.
21. Tsunokawa K and Hoban C. 1997. Roads and the environment: a handbook. Washington, DC: World Bank.
22. Vogl A, Tallis H, Douglass J, et al. 2013. Resource investment optimization system: introduction and theoretical documentation. Stanford, CA: Natural Capital Project.