Accessibility to editorial information in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery journals: The authors' point of view

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 43, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 1078-1081

  Castelo Baz, Pablo ^a   Leira Feijoo, Yago ^a   Seoane Romero, Juan Manuel ^a   Varela Centelles, Pablo ^a,b   Seoane, Juan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

^b Galician Health Service   (Spain)

Author keywords

Dentistry; Maxillofacial surgery; Peer review; Periodicals

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DATA BASE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; ORTHODONTICS; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY; PEER REVIEW; ACCESS TO INFORMATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTISTRY; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMAN; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; ORAL SURGERY; OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; STOMATOLOGY; TIME FACTOR; WRITING;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; AUTHORSHIP; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DENTISTRY; EDITORIAL POLICIES; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMANS; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; ORAL MEDICINE; OTOLARYNGOLOGY; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING; SURGERY, ORAL; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84939470853     PISSN: 10105182     EISSN: 18784119     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. N. Black, S. van Rooyen, F. Godlee, R. Smith, and S. Evans What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal? JAMA 280 1998 231 233
2. Y.G. Cho, and H.A. Park Peer review process in medical journals Korean J Fam Med 34 2013 372 376
3. E. Frank Authors' criteria for selecting journals JAMA 272 1994 163 164
4. J. Gervás, and M. Pérez Fernández Peer review in scientific journals Aten Primaria 27 2001 432 439
5. T. Jefferson, P. Alderson, E. Wager, and F. Davidoff Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review JAMA 287 2002 2784 2786
6. K.P. Lee, M. Schotland, P. Bacchetti, and L.A. Bero Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of clinical research articles JAMA 287 2002 2805 2808
7. T.H. McCalmont Transparency and objectivity J Cutan Pathol 37 2010 513 515
8. L. Özçakar, F. Franchignoni, M. Kara, and S. Muñoz Lasa Choosing a scholarly journal during manuscript submission: the way how it rings true for physiatrists Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 48 2012 643 647
9. G. Regehr, and G. Bordage To blind or not to blind? What authors and reviewers prefer Med Educ 40 2006 832 839
10. D. Richards Little evidence to support the use of editorial peer review to ensure quality of published research Evid Based Dent 8 2007 88 89
11. H.Y. Schultz, and E. Blalock Transparency is the key to the relationship between biomedical journals and medical writers J Invest Dermatol 127 2007 735 737
12. H. Seligmann More transparency in reviewing is called for BMJ 327 2003 989 990
13. F. Shokraneh, R. Ilghami, R. Masoomi, and A. Amanollahi How to select a journal to submit and publish your biomedical paper? Bioimpacts 2 2012 61 68
14. K. Søreide, and D.C. Winter Global survey of factors influencing choice of surgical journal for manuscript submission Surgery 147 2010 475 480
15. A.P. Sprowson, K.S. Rankin, I. McNamara, M.L. Costa, and A. Rangan Improving the peer review process in orthopaedic journals Bone Joint Res 2 2013 245 247
16. J. Watine, and B. Friedberg Améliorer la transparence des publications biomedicales Ann Biol Clin 62 2004 5 6
17. S.J. Welch Selecting the right journal for your submission J Thorac Dis 4 2012 336 338