Technology vs. pedagogy: Instructional effectiveness and student perceptions of a student response system

Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 590-598

  Galal, Suzanne M ^a   Mayberry, John K ^a   Chan, Emily ^b   Hargis, Jace ^c   Halilovic, Jenna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC   (United States)

^b SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CHAMINADE UNIVERSITY OF HONOLULU   (United States)

Author keywords

Active learning; Audience response systems; Large classroom; Student response systems; Technology

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF COVARIANCE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COURSE CONTENT; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; HUMAN; LEARNING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARAMEDICAL EDUCATION; PEDAGOGICS; PERCEPTION; PHARMACY; PHARMACY STUDENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STUDENT ATTITUDE; STUDENT RESPONSE SYSTEM; STUDENT RETENTION;

EID: 84939467903     PISSN: 18771297     EISSN: 18771300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cptl.2015.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Angelo T., Cross P. Classroom Assessment Techniques 1993, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. 2nd ed.
2. Bonwell C.C., Eison A.J. Active learning: creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1 1991, George Washington University Press, Washington, DC.
3. Mahon KL. Using Student Response Systems to Improve Student Outcomes. ; Accessed 03.06.15. http://www.mimio.com/en-NA/Content/White-Papers.aspx.
4. Barber M., Njus D. Clicker evolution: seeking intelligent design. CBE-Life Sci Educ 2007, 6(1):1-8.
5. Johnson D., McLeod S. Get answers: using student response systems to see students' thinking. Learn Lead Technol 2004, 32(4):18-23.
6. Medina M.S., Plaza C.M., Stowe C.D., et al. Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education (CAPE) Educational Outcomes 2013. Am J Pharm Educ 2013, 77(8). Article 162.
7. Cain J., Black E.P., Rohr J. An audience response system strategy to improve student motivation, attention, and feedback. Am J Pharm Educ 2009, 73(2). Article 21.
8. Slain D., Abate M., Hodges B.M., et al. An interactive response system to promote active learning in the doctor of pharmacy curriculum. Am J Pharm Educ 2004, 68(5). Article 117.
9. Liu F.C., Gettig J.P., Fjortoft N. Impact of student response system on short- and long- term learning in a drug literature evaluation course. Am J Pharm Educ 2010, 74(1). Article 6.
10. R Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL ; 2013 Accessed June 6, 2015. http://www.R-project.org/.
11. Blasco-Arcas L., Buil I., Hernández-Ortega B., Sese J. Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance. Comput Educ 2013, 62:102-110.
12. Kay R.H., Lesage A. Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature. Comput Educ 2009, 53(3):819-827.
13. Fies C., Marshall J. Classroom response systems: a review of the literature. J Sci Educ Technol 2006, 15(1):101-109.
14. Johnson L., Becker A., Cummins S., et al. NMC Horizon Report: 2014 Higher Education Edition 2014, 2013. The New Media Consortium, Austin, Texas.
15. Beatty I.D., Gerace W.J. Technology-enhanced formative assessment: a research based pedagogy for teaching science with classroom response technology. J Sci Educ Technol 2009, 18(2):146-162.
16. Beatty, ID. Transforming student learning with classroom communication systems. Educause Center for Applied Research (ECAR) Research Bulletin ERB0403. 2004;(3):1-13.