Online Social Networking, Sexual Risk and Protective Behaviors: Considerations for Clinicians and Researchers

Current Addiction Reports

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 220-228

  Holloway, Ian W ^a   Dunlap, Shannon ^a   del Pino, Homero E ^b   Hermanstyne, Keith ^a   Pulsipher, Craig ^a   Landovitz, Raphael J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Apps; Facebook; Geosocial networking applications; Grindr; HIV; Internet; MSM; MySpace; New media; Online; Sexual risk; Smartphone; SNS; Social media; Social networking; STI; Tablet; Technology; Twitter; Youth

Indexed keywords

EID: 84939210433     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21962952     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40429-014-0029-4     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. Brenner J, Smith A. 72 % of online adults are social networking site users. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2013.
2. Pew Research Global Attitudes Project. Emerging nations embrace internet, mobile technology. Pew Research Center. 2014. http://www.pewglobal.org/2014/02/13/emerging-nations-embrace-internet-mobile-technology/. Accessed May 10 2014.
3. Duggan M, Smith A. Social media update 2013. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2013.
4. Pew Research Internet Project. Social networking fact sheet. Pew Research Center. 2013. http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheets/social-networking-fact-sheet/. Accessed May 7 2014.
5. Pew Research Internet Project. Social media use over time. Pew Research Center. 2014. http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/teens/social-media/. Accessed May 10 2014.
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2011. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2012.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV surveillance report, 2011. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2013.
8. Noll JG, Shenk CE, Barnes JE, Haralson KJ. Association of maltreatment with high-risk internet behaviors and offline encounters. Pediatrics. 2013;131(2):e510–7.
9. Pujazon-Zazik MA, Manasse SM, Orrell-Valente JK. Adolescents' self-presentation on a teen dating web site: a risk-content analysis. J Adolesc Health. 2012;50(5):517–20.
10. Black SR, Schmiege S, Bull S. Actual versus perceived peer sexual risk behavior in online youth social networks. Transl Behav Med. 2013;3(3):312–9. Demonstrates relationship between perceptions of online peers' behaviors and reporting of risk behaviors among a large sample of 16–25 years old Facebook users.
11. Young SD, Jordan AH. The influence of social networking photos on social norms and sexual health behaviors. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013;16(4):243–7.
12. Landovitz RJ, Tseng C-H, Weissman M, Haymer M, Mendenhall B, Rogers K, et al. Epidemiology, sexual risk behavior, and HIV prevention practices of men who have sex with men using GRINDR in Los Angeles, California. J Urban Health. 2013;90(4):729–39. Among the first studies to examine geosocial networking app use among MSM and highlights the acceptability of combined behavioral and biological HIV prevention interventions among app-using MSM.
13. Lehmiller JJ, Ioerger M. Social networking smartphone applications and sexual health outcomes among men who have sex with men. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e86603.
14. Boyd DM, Ellison NB. Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J Comput Mediat Commun. 2007;13(1):210–30.
15. Zhang Y, Leung L. A review of social networking service (SNS) research in communication journals from 2006 to 2011. New Media Soc. 2014. doi:10.1177/1461444813520477.
16. Hinduja S, Patchin JW. Personal information of adolescents on the Internet: a quantitative content analysis of MySpace. J Adolesc. 2008;31(1):125–46.
17. Moreno MA, Parks MR, Zimmerman FJ, Brito TE, Christakis DA. Display of health risk behaviors on MySpace by adolescents: prevalence and associations. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163(1):27–34.
18. Williams AL, Merten MJ. A review of online social networking profiles by adolescents: implications for future research and intervention. Adolescence. 2008;43(170):253–74.
19. Whiteley LB, Brown LK, Swenson RR, Romer D, DiClemente RJ, Salazar LF, et al. African American adolescents and new media: associations with HIV/STI risk behavior and psychosocial variables. Ethn Dis. 2011;21(2):216–22. Links greater internet (including SNS) use with a history of oral/vaginal/anal sex among a large sample of African American adolescents.
20. Young SD, Rice E. Online social networking technologies, HIV knowledge, and sexual risk and testing behaviors among homeless youth. AIDS Behav. 2011;15(2):253–60.
21. Buhi ER, Klinkenberger N, McFarlane M, Kachur R, Daley EM, Baldwin J, et al. Evaluating the internet as a sexually transmitted disease risk environment for teens: findings from the communication, health, and teens study. Sex Transm Dis. 2013;40(7):528–33.
22. Young SD, Rivers C, Lewis B. Methods of using real-time social media technologies for detection and remote monitoring of HIV outcomes. Prev Med. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.01.024. Uses Twitter feeds and existing HIV reporting to document a relationship between sexual tweets and HIV prevalence. Example of how big data can be harnessed for evaluation and detection of HIV risk behaviors in real-time.
23. Friedman AL, Brookmeyer KA, Kachur RE, Ford J, Hogben M, Habel MA, et al. An assessment of the GYT: get yourself tested campaign: an integrated approach to sexually transmitted disease prevention communication. Sex Transm Dis. 2014;41(3):151–7.
24. Grov C, Breslow AS, Newcomb ME, Rosenberger JG, Bauermeister JA. Gay and bisexual men's use of the internet: research from the 1990s through 2013. Am J Mens Health. 2014;51(4):390–409. Provides a comprehensive history of how MSM have used the internet (including SNS) to meet sexual partners and offers an excellent review of work linking online partner seeking to sexual risk behaviors among MSM.
25. Rosser BS, Oakes JM, Horvath KJ, Konstan JA, Danilenko GP, Peterson JL. HIV sexual risk behavior by men who use the internet to seek sex with men: results of the Men’s INTernet Sex Study-II (MINTS-II). AIDS Behav. 2009;13(3):488–98.
26. Bull SS, Breslin LT, Wright EE, Black SR, Levine D, Santelli JS. Case study: an ethics case study of HIV prevention research on facebook: the Just/Us study. J Pediatr Psychol. 2011;36(10):1082–92.
27. Brown G, Maycock B, Burns S. Your picture is your bait: use and meaning of cyberspace among gay men. J Sex Res. 2005;42(1):63–73.
28. Benotsch EG, Kalichman S, Cage M. Men who have met sex partners via the internet: prevalence, predictors, and implications for HIV prevention. Arch Sex Behav. 2002;31(2):177–83.
29. Robinson BA, Moskowitz DA. The eroticism of Internet cruising as a self-contained behaviour: a multivariate analysis of men seeking men demographics and getting off online. Cult Health Sex. 2013;15(5):555–69.
30. Bolding G, Davis M, Hart G, Sherr L, Elford J. Where young MSM meet their first sexual partner: the role of the internet. AIDS Behav. 2007;11(4):522–6.
31. Berry M, Raymond HF, Kellogg T, McFarland W. The internet, HIV serosorting and transmission risk among men who have sex with men, San Francisco. AIDS. 2008;22(6):787–9.
32. Garofalo R, Herrick A, Mustanski BS, Donenberg GR. Tip of the iceberg: young men who have sex with men, the internet, and HIV risk. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(6):1113.
33. Horvath KJ, Bowen AM, Williams ML. Virtual and physical venues as contexts for HIV risk among rural men who have sex with men. Health Psychol. 2006;25(2):237.
34. Chiasson MA, Hirshfield S, Remien RH, Humberstone M, Wong T, Wolitski RJ. A comparison of on-line and off-line sexual risk in men who have sex with men: an event-based on-line survey. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;44(2):235–43.
35. Jenness SM, Neaigus A, Hagan H, Wendel T, Gelpi-Acosta C, Murrill CS. Reconsidering the internet as an HIV/STD risk for men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2010;14(6):1353–61.
36. Mustanski B, Lyons T, Garcia SC. Internet use and sexual health of young men who have sex with men: a mixed-methods study. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40(2):289–300.
37. Grov C, Hirshfield S, Remien RH, Humberstone M, Chiasson MA. Exploring the venue’s role in risky sexual behavior among gay and bisexual men: an event-level analysis from a national online survey in the US. Arch Sex Behav. 2013;42(2):291–302.
38. Kakietek J, Sullivan P, Heffelfinger J. You’ve got male: internet use, rural residence, and risky sex in men who have sex with men recruited in 12 U.S. cities. AIDS Educ Prev. 2011;23(2):118–27. Offers evidence that rural MSM who used the internet to find their last sex partners may be at greater risk of STI/HIV infection than their urban counterparts in a 12-city study of MSM.
39. Bauermeister JA, Leslie-Santana M, Johns MM, Pingel E, Eisenberg A. Mr. Right and Mr. Right Now: romantic and casual partner-seeking online among young men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2011;15(2):261–72.
40. Downing MJ. Using the internet in pursuit of public sexual encounters: is frequency of use associated with risk behavior among MSM? Am J Mens Health. 2012;6(1):18–27.
41. Rice E, Holloway I, Winetrobe H, Rhoades H, Barman-Adhikari A, Gibbs J, et al. Sex risk among young men who have sex with men who use Grindr, a smartphone geosocial networking application. J AIDS Clin Res. 2012;S4:005. doi:10.4172/2155-6113.S4-005.
42. Holloway IW, Rice E, Gibbs J, Winetrobe H, Dunlap S, Rhoades H. Acceptability of smartphone application-based HIV prevention among young men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(2):285–96.
43. Burrell ER, Pines HA, Robbie E, Coleman L, Murphy RD, Hess KL, et al. Use of the location-based social networking application GRINDR as a recruitment tool in rectal microbicide development research. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(7):1816–20.
44. Grosskopf NA, LeVasseur MT, Glaser DB. Use of the internet and mobile-based “apps” for sex-seeking among men who have sex with men in New York City. Am J Mens Health. 2014:1557988314527311.
45. Winetrobe H, Rice E, Bauermeister J, Petering R, Holloway IW. Associations of unprotected anal intercourse with Grindr-met partners among Grindr-using young men who have sex with men in Los Angeles. AIDS Care. 2014:1–6. doi:10.1080/09540121.2014.911811.
46. Vial AC, Starks TJ, Parsons JT. Finding and recruiting the highest risk HIV-negative men who have sex with men. AIDS Educ Prev. 2014;26(1):56–67.
47. Veinot TC, Campbell TR, Kruger D, Grodzinski A, Franzen S, editors. Drama and danger: the opportunities and challenges of promoting youth sexual health through online social networks. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings. Washington, DC: American Medical Informatics Association; 2011.
48. Ralph LJ, Berglas NF, Schwartz SL, Brindis CD. Finding teens in their space: using social networking sites to connect youth to sexual health services. Sex Res Soc Policy. 2011;8(1):38–49.
49. Rendina HJ, Jimenez RH, Grov C, Ventuneac A, Parsons JT. Patterns of lifetime and recent HIV testing among men who have sex with men in New York City who use Grindr. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(1):41–9.
50. Phillips II G, Magnus M, Kuo I, Rawls A, Peterson J, Jia Y, et al. Use of geosocial networking (GSN) mobile phone applications to find men for sex by men who have sex with men (MSM) in Washington, DC. AIDS Behav. 2014:1–8. doi:10.1007/s10461-014-0760-9.
51. Hightow-Weidman L, Beagle S, Pike E, Kuruc J, Leone P, Mobley V, et al. “No one’s at home and they won’t pick up the phone”: using the internet and text messaging to enhance partner services in North Carolina. Sex Transm Dis. 2014;41(2):143–8. Demonstrates the feasibility utility for partner's notification of HIV and syphilis infection via SNS.
52. Bull SS, Levine DK, Black SR, Schmiege SJ, Santelli J. Social media–delivered sexual health intervention: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(5):467–74. Uses a rigorous study design to evaluate the efficacy of a Facebook intervention to promote sexual health among youth and finds promising short-term outcomes related to condom use behavior.
53. Young SD, Szekeres G, Coates T. Sexual risk and HIV prevention behaviours among African-American and Latino MSM social networking users. Int J STD AIDS. 2013;24(8):643–9.
54. Young SD, Holloway IW, Jaganath D, Rice E, Westmoreland D, Coates T. Online social network changes in an HIV prevention RCT for African American and Latino men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2014. Demonstrates that structural network mechanisms are associated with HIV testing behaviors among racial/ethnic minority MSM enrolled in a Facebook-delivered RCT.
55. Bull SS. Sexually transmitted disease prevention campaigns in the 21st century: new frontiers in social media. Sex Transm Dis. 2014;41(3):158–60.
56. Allison S, Bauermeister JA, Bull S, Lightfoot M, Mustanski B, Shegog R, et al. The intersection of youth, technology, and new media with sexual health: moving the research agenda forward. J Adolesc Health. 2012;51(3):207–12.
57. Curtis BL. Social networking and online recruiting for HIV research: ethical challenges. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014;9(1):58–70. Outlines key ethnical considerations for researchers (that are also highly relevant for clinicians) regarding technology-based communication via SNS.
58. Sullivan PS, Grey JA, Rosser BRS. Emerging technologies for HIV prevention for MSM: what we have learned, and ways forward. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;63:S102–7.