The influence of social networking photos on social norms and sexual health behaviors

Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 243-247

  Young, Sean D ^a   Jordan, Alexander H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Dartmouth College ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BEHAVIOR; CONDOM; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; SAFE SEX; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL NETWORK;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONDOMS; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTENTION; MALE; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; RISK-TAKING; SAFE SEX; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL NETWORKING;

EID: 84876101491     PISSN: 21522715     EISSN: 21522723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0080     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Coates TJ, Richter L, Caceres C. Behavioural strategies to reduce HIV transmission: how to make them work better. The Lancet 2008; 372:669-684.
2. Roper WL, Peterson HB. Commentary: condoms and HIV/STD prevention-clarifying the message. American Journal of Public Health 1993; 83:501-503.
3. DiClemente RJ, Forrest KA, Mickler S. College students' knowledge and attitudes about AIDS and changes in HIVpreventive behaviors. AIDS Education and Prevention 1990; 2:201-212.
4. Rotermann M. Trends in teen sexual behavior and condom use. Health Reports 2008; 19:53-56.
5. Eisenberg M. Differences in sexual risk behaviors between college students with same-sex and opposite-sex experience: results from a national survey. Archives of Sexual Behavior 2001; 30:575-589.
6. Freimuth VS,Hammond SL, Edgar T, et al. Factors explaining intent, discussion and use of condoms in first-time sexual encounters. Health Education Research 1992; 7:203-215.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2002) HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report, Vol. 14. www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/resources/reports/ 2002report/pdf/2002 SurveillanceReport.pdf
8. Lewis MA, Kaysen DL, Rees M, Woods BA. The relationship between condom-related protective behavioral strategies and condom use among college students: global- and eventlevel evaluations. Journal of Sex Research 2010; 47:471-478.
9. Paul EL, McManus B, Hayes AM. "Hookups": characteristics and correlates of college students' spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. The Journal of Sex Research 2000; 37:76-88.
10. Lambert TA, Kahn AS, Apple KJ. Pluralistic ignorance and hooking up. The Journal of Sex Research 2003; 40:129-133.
11. Liau A, Millett G, Marks G. Meta-analytic examination of online sex-seeking and sexual risk behavior among men who have sex with men. Sexually Transmitted Diseases 2006; 33:576-584.
12. Ajzen I, Fisbein M. (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
14. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1991; 50:179-211.
15. Green K, Hale JL, Rubin DL. A test of the theory of reasoned action in the context of condom use and AIDS. Communication Reports 1997; 10:22-33.
16. Albarracin D, Johnson BT, Fishbein M, Muellerleile PA. Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 2001; 127:142-161.
17. Sheeran P, Taylor S. Predicting intentions to use condoms: a meta-analysis and comparison of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1999; 29:1624-1675.
18. Chernoff RA, Davison GC. An evaluation of a brief HIV/AIDS prevention intervention for college students using normative feedback and goal setting. AIDS Education and Prevention Volume 2005; 17:91-104.
19. Page RM, Hammermeister JJ, Scanian A. Everybody's not doing it: Misperceptions of college students' sexual activity. American Journal of Health Behavior 2000; 24:387-94.
20. Young SD, Hlavka Z, Modiba P, et al. HIV-related stigma, social norms, and HIV testing in Soweto and Vulindlela, South Africa: national institutes of mental health project accept (HPTN 043). Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 2010; 55:620-624.
21. Young SD. Recommended guidelines on using social networking technologies for HIV prevention research. AIDS and Behavior 2012; 16:1743-1745.
22. Young SD, Dutta D, Dommety G. Extrapolating psychological insights from Facebook profiles. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 2009; 12:347-350.
23. Zhao S, Grasmuck S, Martin J. Identity construction on Facebook: digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior 2008; 24:1816-1836.
24. Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD. Amazon's Mechanical Turk: a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science 2011; 6:3-5.
25. Prentice DA, Miller DT. Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1993; 64:243-256.
26. Jordan AH, Monin B, Dweck CS, et al. Misery has more company than people think: Underestimating the prevalence of others' negative emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2011; 37:120-135.
27. Kraus S. Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: a metaanalysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social Pschology Bulletin 1995; 21:58-75.
28. Ariely D, Loewenstein G. The heat of the moment: the effect of sexual arousal on sexual decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2006; 19:87-98.