Reliability of pedigree-based and genomic evaluations in selected populations

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Gorjanc, Gregor ^a   Bijma, Piter ^b   Hickey, John M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREEDING; ERROR ANALYSIS; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME; GENOTYPE; INBREEDING; PHENOTYPE; PRECISION; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SELECTION;

HUMAN HERPESVIRUS 4;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREEDING; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; MALE; PEDIGREE; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION GENETICS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS;

ANIMALS; BREEDING; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOTYPE; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; PEDIGREE; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84939172886     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: 12979686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12711-015-0145-1     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Henderson CR. Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics. 1975;31:423-47.
2. Henderson CR. Applications of Linear Models in Animal Breeding. Schaeffer LR, editor. 3rd ed. University of GuelphL: Guelph;1984. http://cgil.uoguelph.ca/pub/Henderson.html.
3. Misztal I, Wiggans GR. Approximation of prediction error variance in large-scale animal models. J Dairy Sci. 1988;71:27-32.
4. Meyer K. Approximate accuracy of genetic evaluation under an animal model. Livest Prod Sci. 1989;21:87-100.
5. Jamrozik J, Schaeffer LR, Jansen GB. Approximate accuracies of prediction from random regression models. Livest Prod Sci. 2000;66:85-92.
6. Tier B, Meyer K. Approximating prediction error covariances among additive genetic effects within animals in multiple-trait and random regression models. J Anim Breed Genet. 2004;121:77-89.
7. Hickey JM, Veerkamp RF, Calus MPL, Mulder HA, Thompson R. Estimation of prediction error variances via Monte Carlo sampling methods using different formulations of the prediction error variance. Genet Sel Evol. 2009;41:23.
8. Harris B, Johnson D. Approximate reliability of genetic evaluations under an animal model. J Dairy Sci. 1998;81:2723-8.
9. VanRaden PM, Wiggans GR. Derivation, calculation, and use of national animal model information. J Dairy Sci. 1991;74:2737-46.
10. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited; 1996.
11. Bulmer MG. The effect of selection on genetic variability. Am Nat. 1971;105:201-11.
12. Fimland E. The effect of selection on additive genetic parameters. J Anim Breed Genet. 1979;96:120-34.
13. Henderson CR. Best linear unbiased prediction in populations that have undergone selection. In: Barton RA, Smith WC, editors. Proceedings of the world congress on sheep and beef cattle breeding. 1982. p. 191-200.
14. Wray NR, Hill WG. Asymptotic rates of response from index selection. Anim Prod. 1989;49:217-27.
15. Dekkers JCM. Asymptotic response to selection on best linear unbiased predictors of breeding values. Anim Prod. 1992;54:351-60.
16. Bijma P. Accuracies of estimated breeding values from ordinary genetic evaluations do not reflect the correlation between true and estimated breeding values in selected populations. J Anim Breed Genet. 2012;129:345-58.
17. Schaeffer LR. Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle. J Anim Breed Genet. 2006;123:218-23.
18. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics. 2001;157:1819-29.
19. Van Grevenhof EM, Van Arendonk JA, Bijma P. Response to genomic selection: the Bulmer effect and the potential of genomic selection when the number of phenotypic records is limiting. Genet Sel Evol. 2012;44:26.
20. De Roos APW. Recent trends in genomic selection in dairy cattle. In: Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the European Federation of Animal Science: 29 August-2 September 2011; Stavanger. 2011. p. Contribution 01-7.
21. Simianer H, Chen J, Erbe M. Animal breeding in the genomics era: challenges and opportunities for the maintenance of genetic diversity. In: Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the European Federation of Animal Science: 29 August-2 September 2011; Stavanger. 2011. p. Contribution 11-3.
22. Strandberg E. Opportunities to optimize the role of functional traits in dairy breeding goals using genomics information. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the European Federation of Animal Science: 29 August-2 September 2011; Stavanger. 2011:Contribution 11-2.
23. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2014.
24. Chen GK, Marjoram P, Wall JD. Fast and flexible simulation of DNA sequence data. Genome Res. 2009;19:136-42.
25. Villa-Angulo R, Matukumalli LK, Gill CA, Choi J, Van Tassell CP, Grefenstette JJ. High-resolution haplotype block structure in the cattle genome. BMC Genet. 2009;10:19.
26. Hickey JM, Gorjanc G. Simulated data for genomic selection and genome-wide association studies using a combination of coalescent and gene drop methods. G3 (Bethesda). 2012;2:425-7.
27. VanRaden PM. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci. 2008;91:4414-23.
28. Gianola D, de los Campos G, Hill WG, Manfredi E, Fernando R. Additive genetic variability and the Bayesian alphabet. Genetics. 2009;183:347-63.
29. Wright S. The genetical structure of populations. Ann Eugen. 1949;15:323-54.
30. Rendel JM, Robertson A. Estimation of genetic gain in milk yield by selection in a closed herd of dairy cattle. J Genet. 1950;50:1-8.
31. Cochran WG. Improvement by means of selection. In: Neyman J, editor. Proceedings of the 2nd Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1951. p. 449-70.