Developing a rapid-response program for health system decision-makers in Canada: Findings from an issue brief and stakeholder dialogue

Systematic Reviews

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Wilson, Michael G ^a,b,c   Lavis, John N ^a,b,c,d   Gauvin, Francois Pierre ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Health systems; Knowledge translation; Policymakers; Rapid synthesis; Stakeholder dialogue

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BUSINESS ETHICS; CANADA; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SYSTEM STAKEHOLDER; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAPID RESPONSE PROGRAM; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); CAPACITY BUILDING; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); ORGANIZATION;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CANADA; CAPACITY BUILDING; DECISION MAKING; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; ORGANIZATIONS;

EID: 84939163848     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20464053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-015-0009-3     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Rapid Response. http://cadth.ca/en/products/rapid-response. 13-1-2014.
2. Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS). Les produits de l'INESS. Montréal, Canada: INESS; 2013.
3. Ontario HIV Treatment Network. Rapid Response Service. http://www.ohtn.on.ca/rapid-response-guidelines/. 5-2-2014.
4. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. Knowledge to action. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2014.
5. Khangura S, Konnyu K, Cushman R, Grimshaw J, Moher D. Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach. Syst Rev. 2012;1:10.
6. Bennet G, Jessani N. The Knowledge Translation Toolkit. Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Centre; 2011.
7. McMaster Health Forum. Rapid Response Program. http://www.mcmasterhealthforum.org/policymakers/rapid-response-program. 17-7-2014.
8. Moat KA, Lavis JN, Clancy SJ, El-Jardali F, Pantoja T. Evidence briefs and deliberative dialogues: perceptions and intentions to act on what was learnt. Bull World Health Organ. 2014;92:20-8.
9. Shea B, Grimshaw J, Wells G, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:10-6.
10. Lavis JN, Jessani N, Catallo C, Permanand G, Zierler A, BRIDGE Study Team. Matching form to function: designing organizational models to support knowledge brokering in European Health Systems. Policy Summary 9 (BRIDGE Series). Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2013.
11. Chatham House. Chatham House Rule. http://www.chathamhouse.org/about/chatham-house-rule. 2014. 29-7-2014.
12. Wilson MG, Lavis JN, Gauvin FP. Issue brief: developing a 'rapid response' program for health system decision-makers in Canada. Hamilton, Canada: McMaster Health Forum; 2014.
13. Wilson MG, Gauvin FP, Lavis JN. Dialogue summary: developing a 'rapid response' program for health system decision-makers in Canada. Hamilton, Canada: McMaster Health Forum; 2014.
14. Pitchforth E, Nolte E, Miani C, Winpenny E. Options for effective mechanisms to support evidence-informed policymaking in reproductive, material, newborn and child health in Asia and the Pacific. Cambridge, United Kingdom: RAND Europe; 2013.
15. Healy J, Maxwell J, Hong PK, Lin V. Responding to requests for information on health systems from policy makers in Asian countries. Geneva, Switzerland: Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research; 2007.
16. Bunn F, Sworn K. Strategies to promote the impact of systematic reviews on healthcare policy: a systematic review of the literature. Evidence Policy. 2011;7:403-28.
17. Moore G, Redman S, Haines M, Todd A. What works to increase the use of research in population health policy and programmes: a review. Evidence Policy. 2011;7:277-305.
18. Perrier L, Mrklas K, Lavis J, Straus S. Interventions encouraging the use of systematic reviews by health policymakers and managers: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2011;6:43.
19. Mitton C, Adair CE, McKenzie E, Patten SB, Wayne PB. Knowledge transfer and exchange: review and synthesis of the literature. Milbank Q. 2007;85:729-68.
20. Armitage CJ, Conner M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol. 2001;40:471-99.
21. Sheeran P. Intention-behavior relations: a conceptual and empirical review. In: Strobe W, Hewscone M, editors. European Review of Social Psychology. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2002. p. 1-36.
22. Eccles MP, Hrisos S, Francis J, Kaner EF, Dickinson HO, Beyer F, et al. Do self- reported intentions predict clinicians' behaviour: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2006;1:28.
23. Lavis JN, Wilson MG, Grimshaw J, Haynes RB, Hanna S, Raina P, et al. Effects of an evidence service on healthcare policymakers' use research evidence: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci. 2011;6:51.
24. Campbell D, Donald B, Moore G, Frew D. Evidence Check: knowledge brokering to commission research reviews for policy. Evidence Policy. 2011;7:97-107.
25. Sax Institute. Evidence Check. https://www.saxinstitute.org.au/our-work/knowledge-exchange/evidence-check/. 4-2-0014.
26. World Health Organization - Reiongal Office for Europe. Health Evidence Network (HEN). http://www.euro.who.int/en/what-we-do/data-and-evidence/health-evidence-network-hen/activities. 5-2-2014.
27. International Healthcare Comparisons. An 'on-call' facility for international healthcare comparisons. Rand Europe and The London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine - http://www.international-comparisons.org.uk/. 5-2-2014.
28. SURE. Evidence-informed policymaking: rapid resposes. SURE Project - http://www.who.int/evidence/sure/rapidresponses/en/. 29-11-2013.
29. Khangura S, Polisena J, Clifford TJ, Farrah K, Kamel C. Rapid review: an emerging approach to evidence synthesis in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care2014, Epub ahead of print: 1-8.
30. Uganda Clearinghouse for Health Policy and Systems Research. REACH Uganda Products. http://uchpsr.org/index.php/component/content/article/9-uncategorised/86-reach-uganda-products. 12-2-2014.