The relative importance of price and driving range on electric vehicle adoption: Los Angeles case study

Transportation

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 353-373

  Adepetu, Adedamola ^a   Keshav, Srinivasan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Agent based modeling; Electric vehicle adoption; Electric vehicles; Range anxiety

Indexed keywords

AMPHIBIOUS VEHICLES; AUTONOMOUS AGENTS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COSTS; CRASHWORTHINESS; ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEMS; ELECTRIC BATTERIES; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; VEHICLES;

ADDITIONAL COSTS; AGENT-BASED MODEL; DRIVING RANGE; ECOSYSTEM MODEL; ELECTRIC VEHICLES (EVS); HIGH CAPACITY; POLICY MAKERS; RANGE ANXIETIES;

SECONDARY BATTERIES;

ELECTRIC VEHICLE; POLICY MAKING; PRICE DETERMINATION; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; TRANSPORTATION POLICY; TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGY; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

CALIFORNIA; LOS ANGELES [CALIFORNIA]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84939161649     PISSN: 00494488     EISSN: 15729435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-015-9641-y     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Acha, S., van Dam, K.H., Keirstead, J., Shah, N.: Integrated modelling of agent-based electric vehicles into optimal power flow studies. In: 21st International Conference on Electricity Distribution, pp. pp. 6–9. Frankfurt (2011)
2. Adepetu, A., Arya, V., Keshav, S.: An agent-based electric vehicle ecosystem model: a San Francisco case study. Technical report, University of Waterloo (2014)
3. Al-Alawi, B.M., Bradley, T.H.: Review of hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and electric vehicle market modeling studies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 21, 190–203 (2013)
4. Alternative Fuels Data Center. Fuel properties comparison (2014). http://www.afdc.energy.gov/fuels/fuel_comparison_chart.pdf. Accessed 18 Mar 2014
5. Arellano, B., Sena, S., Abdollahy, S., Lavrova, O., Stratton, S., Hawkins, J.: Analysis of electric vehicle impacts in New Mexico urban utility distribution infrastructure. In: IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo (ITEC), pp. 1–6
6. Boulanger, A.G., Chu, A.C., Maxx, S., Waltz, D.L.: Vehicle electrification: status and issues. Proc. IEEE 99(6), 1116–1138 (2011)
7. Brown, M.: Catching the PHEVer: simulating electric vehicle diffusion with an agent-based mixed logit model of vehicle choice. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 16(2), 5 (2013)
8. Bureau of Labor Statistics.: Average Energy Prices, San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, J 2014. http://www.bls.gov/ro9/cpisanf_energy.htm. Accessed on 17 March 2014
9. California Center for Sustainable Energy.: Clean Vehicle Rebate Project (2014). http://energycenter.org/clean-vehicle-rebate-project. Accessed 17 Mar 2014
10. California Department of Transportation.: 2010–2012 California household travel survey final report (2013)
11. Cui, X., Liu, C., Kim, H.K., Kao, S.C., Tuttle, M.A., Bhaduri, B.L.: A multi agent-based framework for simulating household PHEV distribution and electric distribution network impact. TRB Committee on Transportation Energy (ADC70) (2010)
12. Daziano, R.A.: Conditional-logit Bayes estimators for consumer valuation of electric vehicle driving range. Resour. Energy Econ. 35(3), 429–450 (2013)
13. Electric Drive Transportation Association. Electric drive sales (2014). http://www.electricdrive.org/index.php?ht=d/sp/i/20952/pid/20952. Accessed 02 Mar 2014
14. Electric Power Research Institute.: Total cost of ownership model for current plug-in electric vehicles. Technical report (2013)
15. Eppstein, M.J., Grover, D.K., Marshall, J.S., Rizzo, D.M.: An agent-based model to study market penetration of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Energy Policy 39(6), 3789–3802 (2011)
16. Girishkumar, G., McCloskey, B., Luntz, A., Swanson, S., Wilcke, W.: Lithium–air battery: promise and challenges. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 1(14), 2193–2203 (2010)
17. He, L., Wang, M., Chen, W., Conzelmann, G.: Incorporating social impact on new product adoption in choice modeling: a case study in green vehicles. Transp. Res. Part D 32, 421–434 (2014)
18. IBM.: Battery 500 Project: 800 km range for electric vehicles (2014). http://www.zurich.ibm.com/news/12/battery500.html. Accessed 20 Oct 2014
19. Kim, J.D., Rahimi, M.: Future energy loads for a large-scale adoption of electric vehicles in the city of Los Angeles: impacts on greenhouse gas emissions. Energy Policy 73, 620–630 (2014)
20. MapQuest.: Directions Web Service—MapQuest Platform (2014). http://www.mapquestapi.com/directions/#matrix. Accessed 18 Mar 2014
21. Neubauer, J., Wood, E.: The impact of range anxiety and home, workplace, and public charging infrastructure on simulated battery electric vehicle lifetime utility. J. Power Sour. 257, 12–20 (2014)
22. O’Connor, L. San Francisco and Los Angeles account for 35 % of nation’s electric vehicle sales, data finds (2013). http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/03/california-electric-cars_n_3862972.html. Accessed 17 Jan 2014
23. Paevere, P., Higgins, A., Ren, Z., Horn, M., Grozev, G., McNamara, C.: Spatio-temporal modelling of electric vehicle charging demand and impacts on peak household electrical load. Sustain. Sci. 9(1), 61–76 (2014)
24. Pellon, M.B., Eppstein, M.J., Besaw, L.E., Grover, D.K., Rizzo, D.M., Marshall, J.S.: An agent-based model for estimating consumer adoption of PHEV technology. Transportation Research Board (TRB), pp. 10–3303 (2010)
25. Recargo.: PlugShare—EV charging station map (2014). http://www.plugshare.com/. Accessed 09 Mar 2014
26. Schwoon, M.: Simulating the adoption of fuel cell vehicles. J. Evol. Econ. 16(4), 435–472 (2006)
27. Shafiei, E., Thorkelsson, H., Ásgeirsson, E.I., Davidsdottir, B., Raberto, M., Stefansson, H.: An agent-based modeling approach to predict the evolution of market share of electric vehicles: a case study from Iceland. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 79, 1638–1653 (2012)
28. Sullivan, J., Salmeen, I., Simon, C.: PHEV marketplace penetration: an agent based simulation. Transportation Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (2009)
29. Sweda, T., Klabjan, D. An agent-based decision support system for electric vehicle charging infrastructure deployment. In IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC), pp. 1–5 (2011)
30. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency).: Federal tax credits for electric vehicles purchased in or after 2010 (2014a). http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/taxevb.shtml. Accessed 17 Mar 2014
31. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency).: Fuel economy (2014b). http://www.fueleconomy.gov/. Accessed 18 Mar 2014
32. Voelcker, J.: Reduce, reuse, recycle: average vehicle now 11.4 years old, oldest since WW2 (2013). http://www.greencarreports.com/news/1086136_reduce-reuse-recycle-average-vehicle-now-11-4-years-old-oldest-since-ww2. Accessed 10 Mar 2014
33. Wolf, I., Schröder, T., Neumann, J., de Haan, G.: Changing minds about electric cars: an empirically grounded agent-based modeling approach. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 94, 269–285 (2014)