The impact of two different inspiratory to expiratory ratios (1:1 and 1:2) on respiratory mechanics and oxygenation during volume-controlled ventilation in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial;L’impact de deux ratios inspiratoire à expiratoire différents (1:1 et 1:2) sur la mécanique respiratoire et l’oxygénation pendant la ventilation en volume contrôlé en cas de prostatectomie radicale laparoscopique sous assistance robotisée: une étude randomisée contrôlée

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

Volumn 62, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 979-987

  Kim, Min Soo ^a   Kim, Na Young ^a   Lee, Ki Young ^a   Choi, Young Deuk ^a   Hong, Jung Hwa ^a   Bai, Sun Joon ^a  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AIRWAY PRESSURE; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTERIAL OXYGEN TENSION; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BODY POSITION; BREATHING MECHANICS; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; HEART OUTPUT; HUMAN; INSPIRATORY TO EXPIRATORY RATIO; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OXYGENATION; PARALLEL DESIGN; PNEUMOPERITONEUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATECTOMY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESPIRATORY TRACT DISEASE; RESPIRATORY TRACT PARAMETERS; ROBOT ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; SUPINE POSITION; VOLUME CONTROLLED VENTILATION; ARTIFICIAL PNEUMOPERITONEUM; BLOOD; BLOOD GAS ANALYSIS; BODY POSTURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; LAPAROSCOPY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; ROBOTICS; TIME FACTOR;

OXYGEN;

AGED; BLOOD GAS ANALYSIS; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; HEAD-DOWN TILT; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OXYGEN; PNEUMOPERITONEUM, ARTIFICIAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATECTOMY; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; RESPIRATORY MECHANICS; ROBOTICS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84939138756     PISSN: 0832610X     EISSN: 14968975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-015-0383-2     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Andersson LE, Baath M, Thorne A, Aspelin P, Odeberg-Wernerman S. Effect of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on development of atelectasis during anesthesia, examined by spiral computed tomography. Anesthesiology 2005; 102: 293-9.
2. Kim MS, Bai SJ, Lee JR, Choi YD, Kim YJ, Choi SH. Increase in intracranial pressure during carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum with steep Trendelenburg positioning proven by ultrasonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter. J Endourol 2014; 28: 801-6.
3. Wilcox S, Vandam LD. Alas, poor Trendelenburg and his position! A critique of its uses and effectiveness. Anesth Analg 1988; 67: 574-8.
4. Gainsburg DM. Anesthetic concerns for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Minerva Anestesiol 2012; 78: 596-604.
5. Zavala E, Ferrer M, Polese G, et al. Effect of inverse I: E ratio ventilation on pulmonary gas exchange in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Anesthesiology 1998; 88: 35-42.
6. Kim WH, Hahm TS, Kim JA, et al. Prolonged inspiratory time produces better gas exchange in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery: a randomised trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2013; 57: 613-22.
7. Kim SH, Choi YS, Lee JG, Park IH, Oh YJ. Effects of a 1:1 inspiratory to expiratory ratio on respiratory mechanics and oxygenation during one-lung ventilation in the lateral decubitus position. Anaesth Intensive Care 2012; 40: 1016-22.
8. Sinha M, Chiplonkar S, Ghanshani R. Pressure-controlled inverse ratio ventilation using laryngeal mask airway in gynecological laparoscopy. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2012; 28: 330-3.
9. Deiner S, Silverstein JH. Anesthesia for geriatric patients. Minerva Anestesiol 2011; 77: 180-9.
10. Merchant R, Chartrand D, Dain S, et al. Guidelines to the practice of anesthesia - revised edition 2015. Can J Anesth 2015; 62: 54-79.
11. Choi EM, Na S, Choi SH, An J, Rha KH, Oh YJ. Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation in steep Trendelenburg position for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Clin Anesth 2011; 23: 183-8.
12. Shekerdemian L, Bohn D. Cardiovascular effects of mechanical ventilation. Arch Dis Child 1999; 80: 475-80.
13. Marcy TW. Barotrauma: detection, recognition, and management. Chest 1993; 104: 578-84.
14. Gammon RB, Shin MS, Buchalter SE. Pulmonary barotrauma in mechanical ventilation. Patterns and risk factors. Chest 1992; 102: 568-72.
15. Marcy TW, Marini JJ. Inverse ratio ventilation in ARDS. Rationale and implementation. Chest 1991; 100: 494-504.
16. Herman S, Reynolds EO. Methods for improving oxygenation in infants mechanically ventilated for severe hyaline membrane disease. Arch Dis Child 1973; 48: 612-7.
17. Mercat A, Graini L, Teboul JL, Lenique F, Richard C. Cardiorespiratory effects of pressure-controlled ventilation with and without inverse ratio in the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Chest 1993; 104: 871-5.
18. Cadi P, Guenoun T, Journois D, Chevallier JM, Diehl JL, Safran D. Pressure-controlled ventilation improves oxygenation during laparoscopic obesity surgery compared with volume-controlled ventilation. Br J Anaesth 2008; 100: 709-16.
19. Ogurlu M, Kucuk M, Bilgin F, et al. Pressure-controlled vs volume-controlled ventilation during laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010; 17: 295-300.
20. Tugrul M, Camci E, Karadeniz H, Senturk M, Pembeci K, Akpir K. Comparison of volume controlled with pressure controlled ventilation during one-lung anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1997; 79: 306-10.
21. Prella M, Feihl F, Domenighetti G. Effects of short-term pressure-controlled ventilation on gas exchange, airway pressures, and gas distribution in patients with acute lung injury/ARDS: comparison with volume-controlled ventilation. Chest 2002; 122: 1382-8.
22. Kupersztych-Hagege E, Teboul JL, Artigas A, et al. Bioreactance is not reliable for estimating cardiac output and the effects of passive leg raising in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth 2013; 111: 961-6.
23. Waldron NH, Miller TE, Thacker JK, et al. A prospective comparison of a noninvasive cardiac output monitor versus esophageal Doppler monitor for goal-directed fluid therapy in colorectal surgery patients. Anesth Analg 2014; 118: 966-75.
24. Squara P, Denjean D, Estagnasie P, Brusset A, Dib JC, Dubois C. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM): a clinical validation. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33: 1191-4.
25. Marik PE. Noninvasive cardiac output monitors: a state-of the-art review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2013; 27: 121-34.
26. Hadian M, Pinsky MR. Evidence-based review of the use of the pulmonary artery catheter: impact data and complications. Crit Care 2006; 10(Suppl 3): S8.
27. Josephs LG, Este-McDonald JR, Birkett DH, Hirsch EF. Diagnostic laparoscopy increases intracranial pressure. J Trauma 1994; 36: 815-8; discussion 818-9.
28. Lestar M, Gunnarsson L, Lagerstrand L, Wiklund P, Odeberg-Wernerman S. Hemodynamic perturbations during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in 45° Trendelenburg position. Anesth Analg 2011; 113: 1069-75.
29. Kalmar AF, Foubert L, Hendrickx JF, et al. Influence of steep Trendelenburg position and CO(2) pneumoperitoneum on cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and respiratory homeostasis during robotic prostatectomy. Br J Anaesth 2010; 104: 433-9.