Sea-Level Rise Risk Communication: Public Understanding, Risk Perception, and Attitudes about Information

Environmental Communication

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 612-633

  Covi, Michelle Peppina ^a   Kain, Donna Jean ^b  

^a OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

audience analysis; climate change communication; coastal resource management; document evaluation; risk communication; sea level rise

Indexed keywords

EID: 84939132761     PISSN: 17524032     EISSN: 17524040     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2015.1056541     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. W.N.Adger, S.Dessai, M.Goulden, M.Hulme, I.Lorenzoni, D.R.Nelson, A.Wreford, (2009). Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Climatic Change, 93(3–4), 335–354. doi:10.1007/s10584-008-9520-z
2. L.Antilla, (2010). Self-censorship and science:A geographical review of media coverage of climate tipping points. Public Understanding of Science, 19(2), 240–256. doi:10.1177/0963662508094099
3. T.Aven, & O.Renn, (2009). On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain. Journal of Risk Research, 12(1), 1–11.
4. J.Barber, J.Bellis, A.Blackmore, T.Crabtree, M.Keller, N.Lamb, R.Perry, (2008). Perceptions of sea level rise among adult residents of North Carolina's Outer Banks region. Albemarle Ecological Field Site Capstone Report. Chapel Hill, North Carolina:University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Institute for the Environment.
5. M.C.Barth, & J.G.Titus, (1984). Greenhouse effect and sea level rise:A challenge for this generation. New York, NY:Van Nostrand.
6. Å.Boholm, (2009). Speaking of risk:Matters of context. Environmental Communication, 3(3), 335–354.
7. A.Bostrom, M.G.Morgan, B.Fischhoff, & D.Read, (1994). What do people know about global climate change? Risk Analysis, 14, 959–970. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00065.x
8. S.D.Brody, S.Zahran, A.Vedlitz, & H.Grover, (2008). Examining the relationship between physical vulnerability and public perceptions of global climate change in the United States. Environment and Behavior, 40(1), 72–95. doi:10.1177/0013916506298800
9. C.Brown, S.Campbell, L.R.Henry, & M.M.Robinson, (2008). Public listening sessions:Sea level rise and population growth in North Carolina. Unpublished report.
10. R.J.Brulle, (2010). From environmental campaigns to advancing the public dialog:Environmental communication for civic engagement. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 82–98.
11. A.Carvalho, (2010). Media(ted) discourses and climate change:A focus on political subjectivity and (dis)engagement. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews:Climate Change, 1(2), 172–179.
12. D.W.Cash, W.C.Clark, F.Alcock, N.M.Dickson, N.Eckley, D.H.Guston, R.B.Mitchell, (2003). Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 8086–8091. doi:10.1073/pnas.1231332100
13. J.Chilvers, I.Lorenzoni, G.Terry, P.Buckley, J.K.Pinnegar, & S.Gelcich, (2014). Public engagement with marine climate change issues:(Re)framings, understandings and responses. Global Environmental Change, 29, 165–179. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.006
14. S.L.Cutter, J.T.Mitchell, & M.S.Scott, (2000). Revealing the vulnerability of people and places:A case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90, 713–737.
15. M.de Jong, & D.Rijnks, (2006). Dynamics of iterative reader feedback:An analysis of two successive plus-minus evaluation studies. Journal of Business and Technical Communications, 20(2), 159–176. doi:10.1177/1050651905284401
16. M.de Jong, & P.J.Schellens, (2000). Toward a document evaluation methodology:What does research tell us about the validity and reliability of evaluation methods? IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 43(3), 242–260.
17. R.M.Entman, (1993). Framing:Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
18. L.Evans, T.L.Milfont, & J.H.Lawrence, (2012). Perceptions of sea-level rise:In Wellington City and Kapiti Coast districts. New Zealand:School of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington.
19. B.Fischhoff, (1995). Risk perception and communication unplugged:Twenty years of process. Risk Analysis, 15(2), 137–145. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00308.x
20. B.Fischhoff, (2011). Applying the science of communication to the communication of science. Climatic Change, 108, 701–705. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0183-9
21. M.Galesic, & R.Garcia-Retamero, (2011). Graph literacy:A cross-cultural comparison. Medical Decision Making, 31, 444–457. doi:10.1177/0272989X10373805
22. D.L.Guber, (2013). A cooling climate for change? Party polarization and the politics of global warming. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(1), 93–115. doi:10.1177/0002764212463361
23. D.H.Guston, (2001). Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science:An introduction. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 26, 399–408. doi:10.1177/016224390102600401
24. A.Hansen, & D.Machin, (2013). Editors’ introduction to researching visual environmental communication. Environmental Communication, 7(2), 151–168. doi:10.1080/17524032.2013.785441
25. J.Harvatt, J.Petts, & J.Chilvers, (2011). Understanding householder responses to natural hazards:Flooding and sea-level rise comparisons. Journal of Risk Research, 14(1), 63–83.
26. M.Hulme, (2008). The conquering of climate:Discourses of fear and their dissolution. The Geographical Journal, 174(1), 5–16. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4959.2008.00266.x
27. M.Hulme, (2009). Why we disagree about climate change. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
28. IPCC. (2013). Climate change 2013:The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In T.F.Stocker, D. Qin, G.K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, P.M.Midgley (Eds.) The fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (1535 pp.). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press
29. D.Kahan, (2014). Making climate-science communication evidence-based—All the way down. In M. Boykoff & D. Crow (Eds.), Culture, politics and climate change (pp. 203–220). London:Routledge.
30. D.M.Kahan, E.Peters, M.Wittlin, P.Slovic, L.L.Ouellette, D.Braman, & G.Mandel, (2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, 2, 732–735.
31. D.Kain, & M.Covi, (2013). Visualizing complexity and uncertainty about climate change and sea level rise. Communication Design Quarterly Review, 1(3), 46–53. doi:10.1145/2466489.2466499
32. D.J.Kain, M.de Jong, & C.F.Smith, (2011). Information usability testing. In M.J. Albers & B. Still (Eds.), Usability of complex information systems:Evaluation of user interaction (pp. 305–332). Boca Raton, FL:CRC Press.
33. R.E.Kasperson, & J.X.Kasperson, (1996). The social amplification and attenuation of risk. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 545, 95–105.
34. R.E.Kasperson, J.X.Kasperson, N.Pidgeon, & P.Slovic, (2003). The social amplification of risk:Assessing fifteen years of research and theory. In N. Pidgeon, R.E.Kasperson, & P. Slovic (Eds.), The social amplification of risk (pp. 13–46). Cambridge:Cambridge Press.
35. H.Kim, (2012). Climate change, science and community. Public Understanding of Science, 21(3), 268–285. doi:10.1177/0963662511421711
36. A.Leiserowitz, (2005). American risk perceptions:Is climate change dangerous? Risk Analysis, 25, 1433–1442. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00690.x
37. A.Leiserowitz, E.Maibach, C.Roser-Renouf, & N.Smith, (2011). Global warming's six Americas in May 2011. New Haven, CT:Yale University.
38. W.Leiss, (1996). Three phases in the evolution of risk communication practice. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 545(1), 85–94. doi:10.1177/0002716296545001009
39. A.Lopez, (2010). Defusing the cannon/canon:An organic media approach to environmental communication. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 82–98.
40. S.L’Orange Seigo, S.Dohle, L.Diamond, & M.Siegrist, (2013). The effect of figures in CCS communication. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 16, 83–90.
41. I.Lorenzoni, & N.F.Pidgeon, (2006). Public views on climate change:European and USA perspectives. Climatic Change, 77(1–2), 73–95. doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9072-z
42. E.Maibach, C.Roser-Renouf, & A.Leiserowitz, (2009). Global warming’s six Americas 2009:An audience segmentation analysis. Fairfax, VA:George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication.
43. E.M.Markowitz, & A.F.Shariff, (2012). Climate change and moral judgment. Nature Climate Change, 2(4), 243–247.
44. A.M.McCright, (2010). The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public. Population and Environment, 32(1), 66–87. doi:10.1007/s11111-010-0113-1
45. A.M.McCright, & R.E.Dunlap, (2010). Anti-reflexivity:The American conservative movement's success in undermining climate science and policy. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2–3), 100–133. doi:10.1177/0263276409356001
46. T.Miller, (2010). North Carolina Division of Coastal Management sea level rise scoping survey. Unpublished report.
47. M.G.Morgan, B.Fischhoff, A.Bostrom, & C.J.Altman, (2002). Risk communication:A mental models approach. New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
48. S.C.Moser, (2007). More bad news:The risk of neglecting emotional responses to climate change information (pp. 64–80). New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
49. S.C.Moser, (2010). Communicating climate change:History, challenges, process and future directions. Climate Change, 1(1), 31.
50. S.C.Moser, & L.Dilling, (2004). Making climate hot:Communicating the urgency and challenge of global climate change. Environment, 46(10), 32–46.
51. S.C.Moser, & L.Dilling, (2007). Creating a climate for change. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
52. S.C.Moser, & J.A.Ekstrom, (2010). A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 22026–22031. doi:10.1073/pnas.1007887107
53. National Research Council. (2009). Informing decisions in a changing climate. Panel on strategies and methods for climate-related decision support. Washington, DC:The National Academies Press.
54. B.R.Newell, & A.J.Pitman, (2010). The psychology of global warming:Improving the fit between the science and the message. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 91, 1003–1014. doi:10.1175/2010BAMS2957.1
55. S.A.Nicholson-Cole, (2005). Representing climate change futures:A critique on the use of images for visual communication. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 29(3), 255–273. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2004.05.002
56. S.O'Neill, & S.Nicholson-Cole, (2009). “Fear won’t do it”:Promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication, 30(3), 355–379. doi:10.1177/1075547008329201
57. A.Parris, P.Bromirski, V.R.Burkett, D.R.Cayan, M.Culver, J.Hall, J.L.Weiss, (2012). Global sea level rise scenarios for the US national climate assessment. NOAA Tech Memo OAR CPO-1, 37 pp. Washington, DC:National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration.
58. R.M.Perkowitz, (2010). Climate communications:Conflicts and opportunities. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 66–69.
59. B.Poulter, R.L.Feldman, M.M.Brinson, B.P.Horton, M.K.Orbach, S.H.Pearsall, J.C.Whitehead, (2009). Sea-level rise research and dialogue in North Carolina:Creating windows for policy change. Ocean and Coastal Management, 52(3–4), 147–153. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2008.09.010
60. O.Renn, (2010). The contribution of different types of knowledge towards understanding, sharing and communication risk concepts. Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, 2(2), 177–195. doi:10.1386/cjcs.2.2.177_1
61. S.Roeser, (2012). Risk communication, public engagement, and climate change:A role for emotions. Risk Analysis, 32, 1033–1040. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01812.x
62. P.M.Sandman, (1987). Risk communication:Facing public outrage. EPA Journal, 13, 21–22.
63. J.P.Schuldt, & R.Sungjong, (2014). Media frames and cognitive accessibility:What do “global warming” and “climate change” evoke in partisan minds? Environmental Communication, 8, 529–548. doi:10.1080/17524032.2014.909510
64. S.R.J.Sheppard, (2005). Landscape visualisation and climate change:The potential for influencing perceptions and behaviour. Environmental Science & Policy, 8, 637–654. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2005.08.002
65. P.Slovic, (1999). Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science:Surveying the risk assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis, 19, 689–701.
66. P.Slovic, M.Finucane, E.Peters, & D.G.MacGregor, (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings:Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24(2), 311–322. doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x
67. P.Slovic, M.L.Finucane, E.Peters, & D.G.MacGregor, (2007). The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 177, 1333–1352. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006
68. J.Sonnett, (2010). Climates of risk:A field analysis of global climate change in US media discourse, 1997–2004. Public Understanding of Science, 19, 698–716. doi:10.1177/0963662509346368
69. A.Spence, & N.Pidgeon, (2010). Framing and communicating climate change:The effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Global Environmental Change, 20, 656–667. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.002
70. J.Sterman, (2008). Risk communication on climate:Mental models and mass balance. Science, 322, 532–533. doi:10.1126/science.1162574
71. B.H.Strauss, R.Ziemlinski, J.L.Weiss, & J.Overpeck, (2012). Tidally adjusted estimates of topographic vulnerability to sea level rise and flooding for the contiguous United States. Environmental Research Letters, 7(1), 014033. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014033
72. J.K.Swim, P.C.Stern, T.J.Doherty, S.Clayton, J.P.Reser, E.U.Weber, G.S.Howard, (2011). Psychology's contributions to understanding and addressing global climate change. American Psychologist, 66, 241–250. doi:10.1037/a0023220
73. M.J.Thomas, (2013). Public and expert perceptions of sea-level change on the Severn Estuary (Doctoral dissertation). Cardiff:Cardiff University.
74. E.U.Weber, (2006). Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk:Why global warming does not scare us (yet). Climatic Change, 77(1–2), 103–120. doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9060-3
75. E.U.Weber, & P.C.Stern, (2011). Public understanding of climate change in the United States. American Psychologist, 66(4), 315–328. doi:10.1037/a0023253
76. A.Zia, & A.M.Todd, (2010). Evaluating the effects of ideology on public understanding of climate change science:How to improve communication across ideological divides? Public Understanding of Science, 19, 743–761. doi:10.1177/0963662509357871