-
1
-
-
35248899954
-
Hematopoietic-cell transplantation at 50
-
Appelbaum FR,. Hematopoietic-cell transplantation at 50. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 1472-5.
-
(2007)
N Engl J Med
, vol.357
, pp. 1472-1475
-
-
Appelbaum, F.R.1
-
2
-
-
76749096715
-
Allogeneic and autologous transplantation for haematological diseases, solid tumours and immune disorders: Current practice in Europe 2009
-
Ljungman P, Bregni M, Brune M, et al., Allogeneic and autologous transplantation for haematological diseases, solid tumours and immune disorders: current practice in Europe 2009. Bone Marrow Transplant 2010; 45: 219-34.
-
(2010)
Bone Marrow Transplant
, vol.45
, pp. 219-234
-
-
Ljungman, P.1
Bregni, M.2
Brune, M.3
-
3
-
-
84902084387
-
Hematopoietic SCT in Europe: Data and trends in 2012 with special consideration of pediatric transplantation
-
Passweg JR, Baldomero H, Peters C, et al., Hematopoietic SCT in Europe: data and trends in 2012 with special consideration of pediatric transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2014; 49: 744-50
-
(2014)
Bone Marrow Transplant
, vol.49
, pp. 744-750
-
-
Passweg, J.R.1
Baldomero, H.2
Peters, C.3
-
4
-
-
84859756385
-
Best practice for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization and collection in adults and children: Results of a Società Italiana di Emaferesi e Manipolazione Cellulare (SIDEM) and Gruppo Italiano Trapianto Midollo Osseo (GITMO) consensus process
-
Pierelli L, Perseghin P, Marchetti M, et al., Best practice for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization and collection in adults and children: Results of a Società Italiana Di Emaferesi e Manipolazione Cellulare (SIDEM) and Gruppo Italiano Trapianto Midollo Osseo (GITMO) consensus process. Transfusion 2012; 52: 893-905
-
(2012)
Transfusion
, vol.52
, pp. 893-905
-
-
Pierelli, L.1
Perseghin, P.2
Marchetti, M.3
-
5
-
-
0032465272
-
Glycosylated and non-glycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF)-what is the difference?
-
Höglund M,. Glycosylated and non-glycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF)-what is the difference? Med Oncol 1998; 15: 229-33.
-
(1998)
Med Oncol
, vol.15
, pp. 229-233
-
-
Höglund, M.1
-
6
-
-
0035064941
-
Granulocyte colony stimulating factors: How different are they? How to make a decision?
-
Martin-Christin F,. Granulocyte colony stimulating factors: how different are they? How to make a decision? Anticancer Drugs 2001; 12: 185-91.
-
(2001)
Anticancer Drugs
, vol.12
, pp. 185-191
-
-
Martin-Christin, F.1
-
7
-
-
30544447846
-
Harvesting peripheral blood progenitor cells from healthy donors: Retrospective comparison of filgrastim and lenograstim
-
Martino M, Console G, Irrera G, et al., Harvesting peripheral blood progenitor cells from healthy donors: retrospective comparison of filgrastim and lenograstim. J Clin Apher 2005; 20: 129-36.
-
(2005)
J Clin Apher
, vol.20
, pp. 129-136
-
-
Martino, M.1
Console, G.2
Irrera, G.3
-
8
-
-
27244453576
-
Superior mobilisation of haematopoietic progenitor cells with glycosylated G-CSF in male but not female unrelated stem cell donors
-
Fischer JC, Frick M, Wassmuth R, et al., Superior mobilisation of haematopoietic progenitor cells with glycosylated G-CSF in male but not female unrelated stem cell donors. Br J Haematol 2005; 130: 740-6.
-
(2005)
Br J Haematol
, vol.130
, pp. 740-746
-
-
Fischer, J.C.1
Frick, M.2
Wassmuth, R.3
-
9
-
-
80052224807
-
A systematic review of available clinical evidence - Filgrastim compared with lenograstim
-
Sourgens H, Lefrère F., A systematic review of available clinical evidence-filgrastim compared with lenograstim. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011; 49: 510-8
-
(2011)
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther
, vol.49
, pp. 510-518
-
-
Sourgens, H.1
Lefrère, F.2
-
10
-
-
84923020739
-
Biosimilar granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor for healthy donor stem cell mobilization: Need we be afraid?
-
Bonig H, Becker PS, Schwebig A, et al., Biosimilar granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor for healthy donor stem cell mobilization: need we be afraid? Transfusion 2014; 55: 430-9.
-
(2014)
Transfusion
, vol.55
, pp. 430-439
-
-
Bonig, H.1
Becker, P.S.2
Schwebig, A.3
-
11
-
-
0034671209
-
Cytofluorometric methods for assessing absolute numbers of cell subsets in blood. European Working Group on Clinical Cell Analysis
-
Brando B, Barnett D, Janossy G, et al., Cytofluorometric methods for assessing absolute numbers of cell subsets in blood. European Working Group on Clinical Cell Analysis. Cytometry 2002; 42: 327-46.
-
(2002)
Cytometry
, vol.42
, pp. 327-346
-
-
Brando, B.1
Barnett, D.2
Janossy, G.3
-
13
-
-
0032933737
-
The predictive value of white cell or CD34+ cell count in the peripheral blood for timing apheresis and maximizing yield
-
Yu J, Leisenring W, Bensinger WI, et al., The predictive value of white cell or CD34+ cell count in the peripheral blood for timing apheresis and maximizing yield. Transfusion 1999; 39: 442-50.
-
(1999)
Transfusion
, vol.39
, pp. 442-450
-
-
Yu, J.1
Leisenring, W.2
Bensinger, W.I.3
-
14
-
-
68949092362
-
Short- and long-term safety of lenograstim administration in healthy peripheral haematopoietic progenitor cell donors: A single centre experience
-
Martino M, Console G, Dattola A, et al., Short- and long-term safety of lenograstim administration in healthy peripheral haematopoietic progenitor cell donors: a single centre experience. Bone Marrow Transplant 2009; 44: 163-8.
-
(2009)
Bone Marrow Transplant
, vol.44
, pp. 163-168
-
-
Martino, M.1
Console, G.2
Dattola, A.3
-
15
-
-
84859610971
-
Long-term safety of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in normal donors: Is it all clear?
-
Martino M, Fedele R, Massara E, et al., Long-term safety of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in normal donors: is it all clear? Expert Opin Biol Ther 2012; 12: 609-21.
-
(2012)
Expert Opin Biol Ther
, vol.12
, pp. 609-621
-
-
Martino, M.1
Fedele, R.2
Massara, E.3
-
16
-
-
84875032377
-
New strategies for stem cell mobilization
-
Lemoli RM,. New strategies for stem cell mobilization. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis 2012; 4: e2012066.
-
(2012)
Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis
, vol.4
, pp. e2012066
-
-
Lemoli, R.M.1
-
17
-
-
84906245914
-
Identification of hematopoietic progenitor cell donor characteristics predicting successful mobilization: Results of an Italian multicenter study
-
Bertani G, Santoleri L, Martino M, et al., Identification of hematopoietic progenitor cell donor characteristics predicting successful mobilization: Results of an Italian multicenter study. Transfusion 2014; 54: 2028-3
-
(2014)
Transfusion
, vol.54
, pp. 2028-2023
-
-
Bertani, G.1
Santoleri, L.2
Martino, M.3
-
18
-
-
0028131845
-
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration to healthy volunteers: Analysis of the immediate activating effect on circulating neutrophils
-
De Haas M, Kerst JM, van der Schoot C, et al., Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration to healthy volunteers: analysis of the immediate activating effect on circulating neutrophils. Blood 1994; 84: 3885-94.
-
(1994)
Blood
, vol.84
, pp. 3885-3894
-
-
De Haas, M.1
Kerst, J.M.2
Van Der Schoot, C.3
-
19
-
-
0027312619
-
Single dose of filgrastim (rhG-CSF) increases the number of hematopoietic progenitors in the peripheral blood of adult volunteers
-
Schwinger W, Mache C, Urban C, et al., Single dose of filgrastim (rhG-CSF) increases the number of hematopoietic progenitors in the peripheral blood of adult volunteers. Bone Marrow Transplant 1993; 11: 489-92.
-
(1993)
Bone Marrow Transplant
, vol.11
, pp. 489-492
-
-
Schwinger, W.1
Mache, C.2
Urban, C.3
-
20
-
-
0031213755
-
G-CSF induced mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells for allografting: Comparative study of daily single versus divided dose of G-CSF
-
Yano T, Katayama Y, Sunami K., G-CSF induced mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells for allografting: comparative study of daily single versus divided dose of G-CSF. Int J Hematol 1997; 66: 169-78.
-
(1997)
Int J Hematol
, vol.66
, pp. 169-178
-
-
Yano, T.1
Katayama, Y.2
Sunami, K.3
-
21
-
-
0031821902
-
Comparison between once a day vs twice a day G-CSF for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBSC) in normal donors for allogeneic PBSC transplantation
-
Arbona C, Prosper F, Benet I, et al., Comparison between once a day vs twice a day G-CSF for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBSC) in normal donors for allogeneic PBSC transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998; 22: 39-45.
-
(1998)
Bone Marrow Transplant
, vol.22
, pp. 39-45
-
-
Arbona, C.1
Prosper, F.2
Benet, I.3
-
22
-
-
0033867087
-
A comparative study of once-daily versus twice-daily filgrastim administration for the mobilization and collection of CD34+ peripheral blood progenitor cells in normal donors
-
Anderlini P, Donato M, Lauppe MJ, et al., A comparative study of once-daily versus twice-daily filgrastim administration for the mobilization and collection of CD34+ peripheral blood progenitor cells in normal donors. Br J Haematol 2000; 109: 770-2.
-
(2000)
Br J Haematol
, vol.109
, pp. 770-772
-
-
Anderlini, P.1
Donato, M.2
Lauppe, M.J.3
-
23
-
-
0034490440
-
A randomized comparison of once versus twice daily recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) for stem cell mobilization in healthy donors for allogeneic transplantation
-
Kröger N, Renges H, Krüger W, et al., A randomized comparison of once versus twice daily recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) for stem cell mobilization in healthy donors for allogeneic transplantation. Br J Haematol 2000; 111: 761-5.
-
(2000)
Br J Haematol
, vol.111
, pp. 761-765
-
-
Kröger, N.1
Renges, H.2
Krüger, W.3
-
24
-
-
33644908300
-
A randomized controlled trial to compare once- versus twice-daily filgrastim for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells from healthy donors
-
Komeno Y, Kanda Y, Hamaki T, et al., A randomized controlled trial to compare once- versus twice-daily filgrastim for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells from healthy donors. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2006; 12: 408-413.
-
(2006)
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant
, vol.12
, pp. 408-413
-
-
Komeno, Y.1
Kanda, Y.2
Hamaki, T.3
-
25
-
-
0344097265
-
Stem cell mobilization with G-CSF alone in breast cancer patients: Higher progenitor cell yield by delivering divided doses (2 x 5 microg/kg) compared to a single dose (1 x 10 microg/kg)
-
Kröger N, Zeller W, Hassan HT, et al., Stem cell mobilization with G-CSF alone in breast cancer patients: higher progenitor cell yield by delivering divided doses (2 x 5 microg/kg) compared to a single dose (1 x 10 microg/kg). Bone Marrow Transplant 1999; 23: 125-9.
-
(1999)
Bone Marrow Transplant
, vol.23
, pp. 125-129
-
-
Kröger, N.1
Zeller, W.2
Hassan, H.T.3
-
26
-
-
26844502883
-
Prospective randomized comparative observation of single- vs split-dose lenograstim to mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells following chemotherapy in patients with multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
-
Kim S, Kim HJ, Park JS, et al., Prospective randomized comparative observation of single- vs split-dose lenograstim to mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells following chemotherapy in patients with multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Ann Hematol 2005; 84: 742-7.
-
(2005)
Ann Hematol
, vol.84
, pp. 742-747
-
-
Kim, S.1
Kim, H.J.2
Park, J.S.3
|