Erratum: Orthodontic scanners: What's available? (Journal of Orthodontics 42:2 (136-144) DOI:10.1179/1465313315Y.0000000001));Orthodontic scanners: What's available?

Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 136-143

  Martin, Catherine B ^a   Chalmers, Elsinore V ^a   McIntyre, Grant T ^a   Cochrane, Heather ^a   Mossey, Peter A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

3D models; Benchtop scanners; Digital imaging; Intraoral scanners; Orthodontics; Virtual models

Indexed keywords

CLOUD COMPUTING; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DENTAL TECHNOLOGY; DEVICES; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FLUORESCENCE IMAGING; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL RECORD; ORTHODONTICS; PROCEDURES; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

CLOUD COMPUTING; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL RECORDS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; OPTICAL IMAGING; ORTHODONTICS; TECHNOLOGY, DENTAL; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84938942251     PISSN: 14653125     EISSN: 14653133     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14653125.2015.1139958     Document Type: Erratum

References (33)

1. Asquith J, Mcintyre G. Dental arch relationships on three-dimensional digital study models and conventional plaster study models for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2012;49:530-534.
2. Babayoff N, Glaser-Inbari I. Imaging a three-dimensional structure by confocal focussing an array of light beams. US States Patent, International Patent. 2004.
3. Bailey E, Nelson G, Miller AJ, Andrews L, Johnson E. Predicting tooth-size discrepancy: a new formula utilizing revised landmarks and 3-dimensional laser scanning technology. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2013;143:574-585.
4. Birnbaum NS, Aaronson HB, Stevens C, Cohen B. 3D digital scanners: a hightech approach to more accurate dental impressions. Inside Dent 2009;5:70-74.
5. Bloss R. Accordion fringe interferometry: a revolutionary new digital shapescanning technology. Sens Rev 2008;28:22-26.
6. Brandestini M, Moermann WH. Method and apparatus for the three-dimensional registration and display of prepared teeth. Google Patents. 1989.
7. Cameron-Williams J. Dental Wings will unveil its intra-oral scanner at IDS 2015 [online], 2014. Available at: http://www.appgdentistry.co.uk/uk/services/dentalwings.asp
8. Chalmers E. Intra-oral 3D scanning for assessment of surgical outcome in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate [MDSc thesis]. Dundee: University of Dundee, 2014.
9. Cochrane H. Comparison of two digital model scanners for the evaluation of maxillary arch constriction in cleft lip and palate. Dundee: School of Dentistry, University of Dundee, 2014. Personal communication.
10. Cousley RR, Turner MJ. Digital model planning and computerized fabrication of orthognathic surgery wafers. J Orthod 2014;41:38-45.
11. Duret F. Empreinte optique. Faculté d'Odontologie thèse 2e Cycle 1973.
12. Ender A, Mehl A. Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions - an in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 2011;14:11.
13. Fleming P, Marinho V, Johal A. Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 2011;14:1-16.
14. Gateno J, Xia JJ, Teichgraeber JF, Christensen AM, Lemoine JJ, Liebschner MA, et al. Clinical feasibility of computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) in the treatment of complex cranio-maxillofacial deformities. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:728-734.
15. Hilliard JK. Automated method for producing improved orthodontic aligners. Google Patents. 2006.
16. Information Commissioner's Office. Computer security [online], 2014. Available at: https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/data-protection/security-measures
17. Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogels D 3rd. Study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures, part 1: results and trends. J Clin Orthod 2008;42:625.
18. Kravitz ND, Groth C, Jones PE, Graham JW, Redmond WR. Intraoral digital scanners. J Clin Orthod 2014;48:337.
19. Lee SJ, Gallucci GO. Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:111-115.
20. Logozzo S, Franceschini G, Kilpelä A, Caponi M, Governi L, Blois L. A comparative analysis of intraoral 3D digital scanners for restorative dentistry. Internet J Med Technol 2011;5:1-22.
21. Logozzo S, Zanetti EM, Franceschini G, Kilpelä A, Mäkynen A. Recent advances in dental optics - Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Opt Laser Eng 2014;54:203-221.
22. Luthardta R, Loosb R, Quaasc S. Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression. Int J Comput Dent 2005;8:283-294.
23. Mehl A, Ender A, Mö rmann W, Attin T. Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent 2008;12:11-28.
24. Mö rmann W, Brandestini M, Ferru A, Lutz F, Krejci I. Marginal adaptation of adhesive porcelain inlays in vitro. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1985;95:1118.
25. Mö rmann WH. The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:7S-13S.
26. Oxford English Dictionary. Cloud Computing, n. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2014.
27. Peluso MJ, Josell SD, Levine SW, Lorei BJ. Digital models: an introduction. Semin Orthod 2004;10:226-238.
28. Rheude B, Lionel Sadowsky P, Ferriera A, Jacobson A. An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Angle Orthod 2005;75:300-304.
29. Roberta T, Federico M, Federica B, Antonietta CM, Sergio B, Ugo C. Study of the potential cytotoxicity of dental impression materials. Toxicol In Vitro 2003;17:657-662.
30. van der Meer WJ, Andriessen FS, Wismeijer D, Ren Y. Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PloS One 2012;7:e43312.
31. van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012;28:3-12.
32. Wiechmann D, Rummel V, Thalheim A, Simon JS, Wiechmann L. Customized brackets and archwires for lingual orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac 2003;124:593-599.
33. Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, Bilir H. Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients' perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health 2014;14:10.