A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: Partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects

BMC Public Health

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Jagosh, Justin ^a   Bush, Paula L ^b   Salsberg, Jon ^b   Macaulay, Ann C ^b   Greenhalgh, Trish ^c   Wong, Geoff ^c   Cargo, Margaret ^d   Green, Lawrence W ^e   Herbert, Carol P ^f   Pluye, Pierre ^b  

^a Centre for the Advancement of Realist Evaluation and Synthesis Waterhouse Building   (United Kingdom)

^b Department of Family Medicine ^*  (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f WESTERN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Community based participatory research; Partnership synergy; Public health; Realist analysis; Realist synthesis; Ripple effect; Spin off projects; Sustainability; Systemic transformations; Trust

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COOPERATION; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; PUBLIC RELATIONS; RESEARCH; TIME FACTOR; TRUST; UNIVERSITY;

COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; COMMUNITY-INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; RESEARCH; TIME FACTORS; TRUST; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 84938892335     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-1949-1     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Cargo M, Mercer SL. The Value and Challenges of Participatory Research: Strengthening Its Practice. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29(1):325-50.
2. Macaulay AC et al. Participatory research maximises community and lay involvement. Br Med J. 1999;319(7212):774-8.
3. Minkler M, Wallerstein N, editors. Community-Based Participatory Research for Health. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008.
4. Wallerstein N, Duran B. The Theoretical, Historical, and Practice Roots of CBPR. In: Minkler M, Wallerstein N, editors. Community-Based Participatory Research for Health: From Process to Outcomes. San Francisco: Wiley & Sons; 2008. p. 25-39.
5. Ismail S. Participatory Health Research in International Observatory on Health Research Systems. Cambridge: RAND Report: UK Department of Health; 2009.
6. Minkler M, Wallerstein N. Introduction to Community-Based Participatory Research. In: Minkler M, Wallerstein N, editors. Community-Based Paticipatory Research for Health: From Process to Outcomes. San Fransisco: Wiley & Sons; 2008. p. 1-23.
7. Wallerstein N, Duran B. Community-Based Participatory Research Contribution to Intervention Research: The Intersection of Science and Practice to Improve Health Equity. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(S1):S40-6.
8. Hicks S et al. Evaluating community-based participatory research to improve community-partnered science and community health. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012;6(3):289-99.
9. Oetzel J, Zhou C, Duran B, Pearson C, Magarati M, Lucero J, et al. Establishing the psychometric properties of constructs in a community-based participatory research conceptual model. Am J Health Promot 2015 29(5):e188-202.
10. Marent B, Forster R, Nowak P. Theorizing participation in health promotion: A literature review. Soc Theory Health. 2012;10(2):188-207.
11. Mercer SL, Green LW, Cargo M, Potter MA, Daniel M, Scott Olds R, et al. Appendix C: Reliabilitytested guidelines for assessing PR projects. In: Community-Based Participatory Research for Health: from practice to outcomes, 2nd edition. edn. Edited by Minkler M, Wallerstein N. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008.
12. Wallerstein N, Oetzel J, Duran B, Tafoya G, Belone L, Rae R. What predicts outcomes in CBPR? In: Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes. 2nd edn. Edited by Minkler M, Wallerstein N. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2008:371-92.
13. O'Fallon L, Tyson F, & Dearry A. Successful Models of Community-Based Participatory Research. Final Report. National Institute of Health and National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, http://www.hud.gov/offices/lead/library/hhts/NIEHS-Successful-Models.pdf (download date 22.06.2015): Washington, DC. 2000.
14. Cacari-Stone L et al. The Promise of Community-Based Participatory Research for Health Equity: A Conceptual Model for Bridging Evidence with Policy. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(9):1615-23.
15. Berkowitz B. Studying the Outcomes of Community-Based Coalitions. Am J Community Psychol. 2001;29(2):213-27.
16. Khodyakov D et al. An Exploration of the Effect of Community Engagement in Research on Perceived Outcomes of Partnered Mental Health Services Projects(). Society and mental health. 2011;1(3):185-99.
17. Sandoval JA et al. Process and outcome constructs for evaluating community-based participatory research projects: a matrix of existing measures. Health Educ Res. 2012;27(4):680-90.
18. Khodyakov D et al. On Measuring Community Participation in Research. Health Educ Behav. 2013;40(3):346-54.
19. Macaulay A et al. Assessing the benefits of participatory research: a rationale for a realist review. Glob Health Promot. 2011;18(2):45-8.
20. Jagosh J, Pluye P, Macaulay AC, Salsberg J, Henderson J, Sirett E, et al. Assessing the outcomes of participatory research: protocol for identifying, selecting, appraising and synthesizing the literature for realist review. Implementation Science. 2011;6(1):24.
21. Jagosh J et al. Uncovering the Benefits of Participatory Research: Implications of a Realist Review for Health Research and Practice. Milbank Q. 2012;90(2):311-46.
22. Macaulay A et al. Quantitative Methods in Participatory Research: Being sensitive to issues of scientific validity, community safety, and the academic-community relationship. Nouvelles pratiques sociales. 2014;25(2):159-72.
23. Jagosh J et al. Critical Reflections on Realist Review: insights from customizing the methodology to the needs of participatory research assessment. Res Synth Methods. 2013;5(2):131-14.
24. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage; 1997.
25. Pawson R. Evidence-based Policy: A Realist Perspective. London: SAGE publications; 2006.
26. Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative Methods for Health Research. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2009.
27. Pawson R et al. Realist review: a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10:21-34.
28. Pawson R. The Science of Evaluation: A realist manifesto. London: Sage Publications; 2013.
29. Merton RK. Social theory and social structure. New York, NY: The Free Press; 1968.
30. Lasker R, Weiss E, Miller R. Partnership Synergy: A Practical Framework for Studying and Strengthening the Collaborative Advantage. Milbank Q. 2001;79(2):179-205.
31. Trickett E. The Ecology of Multilevel Interventions to Reduce Social Inequalities in Health. Am Behav Sci. 2013;57(8):1227-46.
32. Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T. Theorising interventions as events in systems. Am J Community Psychol. 2009;43(3-4):267-76.
33. Cargo M et al. Community governance of the Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project, Kahnawake Territory, Mohawk Nation, Canada. Health Promot Int. 2003;18(3):177-87.
34. Jones L & Wells K. Strategies for Academic and Clinician Engagement in Community-Participatory Partnered Research. Journal of the American Medical Association 2007, 297(4):407-410.
35. Chung B, Corbett C, Boulet B, Cummings J, Paxton K, McDaniel S, et al. Talking Wellness: a description of a community-academic partnered project to engage an African-American community around depression through the use of poetry, film, and photography. Ethn Dis 2006;16(1Suppl 1):S67-78.
36. Glasgow R et al. An Evidence Integration Triangle for Aligning Science with Policy and Practice. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(6):646-54.
37. Milat A, Bauman A, Redman S. A narrative review of research impact assessment models and methods. Health Research Policy and Systems. 2015;13(1):18.
38. Lukes S. Power: A Radical View. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1974.
39. Greener I. Patient choice in the NHS: the view from economic sociology. Social Theory and Health. 2003;1:72-89.
40. Robb N, Greenhalgh T. 'You have to cover up the words of the doctor'. The mediation of trust in interpreted consultations in primary care. Social Science in Medicine. 2005;20:434-55.
41. Moynihan D. Maximum Feasible Misunderstanding: Community action in the war on poverty. New York: Free Press; 1969.
42. Trickett E et al. Advancing the Science of Community-Level Interventions. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(8):9.