No evidence of relation between working memory and perception of interrupted speech in young adults

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 138, Issue 2, 2015, Pages EL145-EL150

  Nagaraj, Naveen K ^a   Knapp, Andrea N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT LITTLE ROCK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; LINGUISTICS; SPEECH;

COGNITIVE FACTORS; RESTORATION MECHANISM; STATISTICAL RELATIONS; TOPDOWN; WORKING MEMORY; YOUNG ADULTS;

SPEECH RECOGNITION;

ADULT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; READING; RECALL; SHORT TERM MEMORY; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME FACTOR; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MENTAL RECALL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; READING; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84938874656     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.4927635     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Akeroyd, M. A. (2008). " Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults," Int. J. Audiol. 47 (Suppl 2), S53-S71. 10.1080/14992020802301142
2. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (1994). " Audiologic screening " [technical report], available from www.asha.org/policy (Last viewed 7/29/2015).
3. Barrouillet, P., Portrat, S., and Camos, V. (2011). " On the law relating processing to storage in working memory," Psychol. Rev. 118, 175-192. 10.1037/a0022324
4. Benard, M., Mensink, J., and Baskent, D. (2014). " Individual differences in top-down restoration of interrupted speech: Links to linguistic and cognitive abilities," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 135 (2), EL88-EL94. 10.1121/1.4862879
5. Bhargava, P., and Baskent, D. (2012). " Effects of low-pass filtering on intelligibility of periodically interrupted speech," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131 (2), EL87-EL92. 10.1121/1.3670000
6. Camos, V., and Barrouillet, P. (2009). " Two maintenance mechanisms of verbal information in working memory," J. Memory Lang. 61, 457-469. 10.1016/j.jml.2009.06.002
7. Engle, R. (2002). " Working memory capacity as executive attention," Curr. Direct. Psychol. Sci. 11, 19-23. 10.1111/1467-8721.00160
8. Humes, L., Lee, J., and Coughlin, M. (2006). " Auditory measures of selective and divided attention in young and older adults using single-talker competition," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120 (5), 2926-2937. 10.1121/1.2354070
9. Killion, M., Niquette, P., Gudmundsen, G., Revit, L., and Banerjee, S. (2004). " Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116 (4), 2395-2405. 10.1121/1.1784440
10. Miller, G., and Licklider, J. (1950). " The intelligibility of interrupted speech," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 22, 167-173. 10.1121/1.1906584
11. Redick, T., Broadway, J., Meier, M., Kuriakose, P., Unsworth, N., Kane, M., and Engle, R. (2012). " Measuring working memory capacity with automated complex span tasks," Eur. J. Psychol. Assess. 28 (3), 164-171. 10.1027/1015-5759/a000123
12. Rönnberg, J., Rudner, M., Foo, C., and Lunner, T. (2008). " Cognition counts: A working memory system for Ease of Language Understanding (ELU)," Int. J. Audiol. 47 (Suppl 2), S99-S105. 10.1080/14992020802301167
13. Saija, J., Akyürek, E., Andringa, T., and Başkent, D. (2014). " Perceptual restoration of degraded speech is preserved with advancing age," J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 15 (1), 139-148. 10.1007/s10162-013-0422-z
14. Shafiro, V., Sheft, S., and Risley, R. (2011). " Perception of interrupted speech: Cross-rate variation in the intelligibility of gated and concatenated sentences," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130 (2), EL108-EL114. 10.1121/1.3606463
15. Wang, X., and Humes, L. (2010). " Factors influencing recognition of interrupted speech," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 128 (4), 2100-2111. 10.1121/1.3483733