The importance of neighborhood type dissonance in understanding the effect of the built environment on travel behavior

Journal of Transport and Land Use

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 45-57

  Manaugh, Kevin ^a   El Geneidy, Ahmed M ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84938793013     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19387849     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5198/jtlu.2015.718     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Cao, X., and D. Chatman. 2012. How will land use policies affect travel? The importance of residen- tial sorting. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, January 22-26 Washington, DC.
2. Chatman, D. 2009. Residential choice, the built environment, and nonwork travel: Evidence using new data and methods. Environment and Planning A 41(5).
3. de Vos, J., B. Derudder, V. Van Acker, and F. Witlox. 2012. Reducing car use: Changing attitudes or relocating? The influence of residential dissonance on travel behavior. Journal of Transport Geography 22: 1-9.
4. Lund, H. 2003.Testing the claims of new urbanism: Local access, pedestrian travel, and neighboring behaviors, Journal of the American Planning Association 69:4: 414-429.
5. Naess, P. 2009. Residential self-selection and appropriate control variables in land use: Travel studies. Transport Reviews 29(3): 293-324.
6. Norusis, M. 2010. PASW Statistics 18 Guide to Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentiss Hall
7. Schwanen, T., and P. Mokhtarian. 2005. What if you live in the wrong neighborhood? The impact of residential neighborhood type dissonance on distance traveled. Transportation Research Part D 10(2): 127-151.
8. Schwanen, T., and P. Mokhtarian. 2007. Attitudes toward travel and land use and choice of residen- tial neighborhood type: Evidence from the San Francisco bay area. Housing Policy Debate 18(1): 171-207